Personalized Learning Path Problem Variations: Computational Complexity and AI Approaches

Sean A. Mochocki;Mark G. Reith;Brett J. Borghetti;Gilbert L. Peterson;John D. Jasper;Laurence D. Merkle
{"title":"Personalized Learning Path Problem Variations: Computational Complexity and AI Approaches","authors":"Sean A. Mochocki;Mark G. Reith;Brett J. Borghetti;Gilbert L. Peterson;John D. Jasper;Laurence D. Merkle","doi":"10.1109/TAI.2024.3483190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-learning courses often suffer from high dropout rates and low student satisfaction. One way to address this issue is to use personalized learning paths (PLPs), which are sequences of learning materials that meet the individual needs of students. However, creating PLPs is difficult and often involves combining knowledge graphs (KGs), student profiles, and learning materials. Researchers typically assume that the problem of creating PLPs belong to the nondeterministic polynomial (NP)-hard class of computational problems. However, previous research in this field has neither defined the different variations of the PLP problem nor formally established their computational complexity. Without clear definitions of the PLP variations, researchers risk making invalid comparisons and conclusions when they use different metaheuristics for different PLP problems. To unify this conversation, this article formally proves the NP-completeness of two common PLP variations and their generalizations and uses them to categorize recent research in the PLP field. It then presents an instance of the PLP problem using real-world data and shows how this instance can be cast into two different NP-complete variations. This article then presents three artificial intelligence (AI) strategies, solving one of the PLP variations with back-tracking and branch and bound heuristics and also converting the PLP variation instance to XCSP<inline-formula><tex-math>${}^{3}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, an intermediate constraint satisfaction language to be resolved with a general constraint optimization solver. This article solves the other PLP variation instance using a greedy search heuristic. The article finishes by comparing the results of the two different PLP variations.","PeriodicalId":73305,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","volume":"6 3","pages":"574-588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10722910","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10722910/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-learning courses often suffer from high dropout rates and low student satisfaction. One way to address this issue is to use personalized learning paths (PLPs), which are sequences of learning materials that meet the individual needs of students. However, creating PLPs is difficult and often involves combining knowledge graphs (KGs), student profiles, and learning materials. Researchers typically assume that the problem of creating PLPs belong to the nondeterministic polynomial (NP)-hard class of computational problems. However, previous research in this field has neither defined the different variations of the PLP problem nor formally established their computational complexity. Without clear definitions of the PLP variations, researchers risk making invalid comparisons and conclusions when they use different metaheuristics for different PLP problems. To unify this conversation, this article formally proves the NP-completeness of two common PLP variations and their generalizations and uses them to categorize recent research in the PLP field. It then presents an instance of the PLP problem using real-world data and shows how this instance can be cast into two different NP-complete variations. This article then presents three artificial intelligence (AI) strategies, solving one of the PLP variations with back-tracking and branch and bound heuristics and also converting the PLP variation instance to XCSP${}^{3}$, an intermediate constraint satisfaction language to be resolved with a general constraint optimization solver. This article solves the other PLP variation instance using a greedy search heuristic. The article finishes by comparing the results of the two different PLP variations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信