Modelling route choice in public transport with deep learning

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Alessio Daniele Marra, Francesco Corman
{"title":"Modelling route choice in public transport with deep learning","authors":"Alessio Daniele Marra, Francesco Corman","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10597-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For choice problems in transportation, machine learning and deep learning are alternative methods to traditional choice models. While several works explored the potential of this technology for modelling mode choice, lower attention is given to route choice, especially in public transport. In this work, we propose a deep learning model designed specifically for route choice in public transport. The model can estimate a nonlinear utility function, allowing complex interactions among the variables; it can easily include non-alternative specific variables, such as weather or socio-demographic information. Moreover, compared to the traditional choice models, it numerically outperforms the Path Size Logit Model in prediction performance, and does not require pre-specification of the model by an experienced human modeler. These properties are particularly useful for route choice analyses, to capture possible heterogeneities or complex behavior, which are difficult to model a priori. We evaluated the interpretability of the model observing the marginal rates of substitution and applying Accumulated Local Effects, showing meaningful effects of the variables on the probability to choose an alternative. We tested the proposed model on a large-scale dataset based on GPS tracking. We considered both synthetic choices, to demonstrate the model properties, and real choices, to evaluate the model in practice. The results showed moderately better performance of the deep learning model compared to the Path Size Logit, confirming the possibility of using it for modeling and predicting route choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10597-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For choice problems in transportation, machine learning and deep learning are alternative methods to traditional choice models. While several works explored the potential of this technology for modelling mode choice, lower attention is given to route choice, especially in public transport. In this work, we propose a deep learning model designed specifically for route choice in public transport. The model can estimate a nonlinear utility function, allowing complex interactions among the variables; it can easily include non-alternative specific variables, such as weather or socio-demographic information. Moreover, compared to the traditional choice models, it numerically outperforms the Path Size Logit Model in prediction performance, and does not require pre-specification of the model by an experienced human modeler. These properties are particularly useful for route choice analyses, to capture possible heterogeneities or complex behavior, which are difficult to model a priori. We evaluated the interpretability of the model observing the marginal rates of substitution and applying Accumulated Local Effects, showing meaningful effects of the variables on the probability to choose an alternative. We tested the proposed model on a large-scale dataset based on GPS tracking. We considered both synthetic choices, to demonstrate the model properties, and real choices, to evaluate the model in practice. The results showed moderately better performance of the deep learning model compared to the Path Size Logit, confirming the possibility of using it for modeling and predicting route choice.

基于深度学习的公共交通路径选择建模
对于交通运输中的选择问题,机器学习和深度学习是传统选择模型的替代方法。虽然有几部作品探讨了该技术在建模模式选择方面的潜力,但对路线选择的关注较少,特别是在公共交通中。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个专门为公共交通路线选择设计的深度学习模型。该模型可以估计一个非线性效用函数,允许变量之间复杂的相互作用;它可以很容易地包括不可替代的特定变量,如天气或社会人口统计信息。此外,与传统的选择模型相比,它在预测性能上优于路径大小Logit模型,并且不需要由经验丰富的人类建模师预先规范模型。这些属性对于路径选择分析特别有用,可以捕获可能的异质性或复杂行为,这很难先验地建模。我们通过观察边际替代率和应用累积局部效应来评估模型的可解释性,显示了变量对选择替代概率的有意义的影响。我们在基于GPS跟踪的大规模数据集上对该模型进行了测试。我们既考虑了综合选择,以证明模型的性质,也考虑了实际选择,以在实践中评估模型。结果显示,与路径大小Logit相比,深度学习模型的性能略好,证实了将其用于建模和预测路径选择的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信