Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Josefine Wilms, Markus Hauk, Natalia Panafidina, Michael Murböck, Karl Hans Neumayer, Christoph Dahle, Frank Flechtner
{"title":"Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information","authors":"Josefine Wilms, Markus Hauk, Natalia Panafidina, Michael Murböck, Karl Hans Neumayer, Christoph Dahle, Frank Flechtner","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01931-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Errors in ocean tide and non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic models are among the largest error sources in gravity field recovery from space. We co-estimate corrections to these background models subject to uncertainty constraints during the adjustment procedure of gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients. Simulations are performed for the Mass-Change and Geoscience International Constellation to evaluate the effect of such a constrained procedure on monthly gravity field retrievals for the planned ESA-NASA double-pair mission. The influence of co-estimating background model corrections subject to known uncertainty information is evaluated separately for both types of background models and is then combined and used to retrieve monthly gravity fields over one year. Retrieval errors are compared to those obtained with the standard recovery procedure, which neglects these corrections. It is shown that gravity field retrieval errors are reduced by up to 36%. In addition, the one-year simulation is used to estimate residual corrections for eight major tidal constituents in order to improve ocean tide background modelling. Adding these residual corrections to the applied a priori ocean tide model shows that ocean tide errors are decreased by up to 27%.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01931-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Errors in ocean tide and non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic models are among the largest error sources in gravity field recovery from space. We co-estimate corrections to these background models subject to uncertainty constraints during the adjustment procedure of gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients. Simulations are performed for the Mass-Change and Geoscience International Constellation to evaluate the effect of such a constrained procedure on monthly gravity field retrievals for the planned ESA-NASA double-pair mission. The influence of co-estimating background model corrections subject to known uncertainty information is evaluated separately for both types of background models and is then combined and used to retrieve monthly gravity fields over one year. Retrieval errors are compared to those obtained with the standard recovery procedure, which neglects these corrections. It is shown that gravity field retrieval errors are reduced by up to 36%. In addition, the one-year simulation is used to estimate residual corrections for eight major tidal constituents in order to improve ocean tide background modelling. Adding these residual corrections to the applied a priori ocean tide model shows that ocean tide errors are decreased by up to 27%.

利用背景模型不确定性信息优化MAGIC任务概念重力场检索
在空间重力场恢复中,海潮和非潮汐大气和海洋模式的误差是最大的误差来源之一。在重力场球谐系数平差过程中,我们对这些背景模型在不确定性约束下的修正量进行了共估计。对质量变化和地球科学国际星座进行了模拟,以评估这种约束程序对计划中的ESA-NASA双对任务每月重力场检索的影响。根据已知的不确定性信息,对两种类型的背景模式分别评估共同估计背景模式修正的影响,然后将其组合起来,用于检索一年内每月的重力场。将检索错误与忽略这些更正的标准恢复程序获得的错误进行比较。结果表明,该方法可使重力场反演误差降低36%。此外,利用1年模拟结果估计了8种主要潮汐成分的残差改正量,以改进海潮背景模拟。将这些残差校正加到应用的先验海潮模型中,海潮误差降低了27%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信