Differences in the risk of frailty based on care receipt, unmet care needs and socio-economic inequalities: A longitudinal analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Frailty & Aging Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100012
David R Sinclair, Asri Maharani, Andrew Clegg, Barbara Hanratty, Gindo Tampubolon, Chris Todd, Raphael Wittenberg, Terence W O'Neill, Fiona E Matthews
{"title":"Differences in the risk of frailty based on care receipt, unmet care needs and socio-economic inequalities: A longitudinal analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.","authors":"David R Sinclair, Asri Maharani, Andrew Clegg, Barbara Hanratty, Gindo Tampubolon, Chris Todd, Raphael Wittenberg, Terence W O'Neill, Fiona E Matthews","doi":"10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The older population is increasingly reliant on social care, especially those who are frail. However, an estimated 1.5 million people over 65 in England have unmet care needs. The relationship between receiving care, or receiving insufficient care, and changes in frailty status remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the associations between care receipt (paid or unpaid), unmet care needs, frailty status, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used multistate models to estimate the risk of increasing or decreasing levels of frailty, using English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) data. Covariates included age, gender, wealth, area deprivation, education, and marital status. Care status was assessed through received care and self-reported unmet care needs, while frailty status was determined using a frailty index.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>15,003 individuals aged 50+, using data collected over 18 years (2002-2019).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals who receive care are more susceptible to frailty and are less likely to recover from frailty to a less frail state. The hazard ratio of males receiving care transitioning from prefrailty to frailty was 2.1 [95 % CI: 1.7-2.6] and for females 1.8 [1.5-2.0]. Wealth is an equally influential predictor of changes in frailty status: individuals in the lowest wealth quintile who do not receive care are as likely to become frail as those in the highest wealth quintile who do receive care. As individuals receiving care (including unpaid care) are likely to be in poorer health than those who do not receive care, this highlights stark inequalities in the risk of frailty between the richest and poorest individuals. Unmet care needs were associated with transitioning from prefrailty to frailty for males (hazard ratio: 1.7 [1.2-2.4]) but not for females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals starting to receive care (paid or unpaid) and people in the poorest wealth quintile are target groups for interventions aimed at delaying the onset of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"14 2","pages":"100012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The older population is increasingly reliant on social care, especially those who are frail. However, an estimated 1.5 million people over 65 in England have unmet care needs. The relationship between receiving care, or receiving insufficient care, and changes in frailty status remains unclear.

Objectives: To investigate the associations between care receipt (paid or unpaid), unmet care needs, frailty status, and mortality.

Design: We used multistate models to estimate the risk of increasing or decreasing levels of frailty, using English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) data. Covariates included age, gender, wealth, area deprivation, education, and marital status. Care status was assessed through received care and self-reported unmet care needs, while frailty status was determined using a frailty index.

Participants: 15,003 individuals aged 50+, using data collected over 18 years (2002-2019).

Results: Individuals who receive care are more susceptible to frailty and are less likely to recover from frailty to a less frail state. The hazard ratio of males receiving care transitioning from prefrailty to frailty was 2.1 [95 % CI: 1.7-2.6] and for females 1.8 [1.5-2.0]. Wealth is an equally influential predictor of changes in frailty status: individuals in the lowest wealth quintile who do not receive care are as likely to become frail as those in the highest wealth quintile who do receive care. As individuals receiving care (including unpaid care) are likely to be in poorer health than those who do not receive care, this highlights stark inequalities in the risk of frailty between the richest and poorest individuals. Unmet care needs were associated with transitioning from prefrailty to frailty for males (hazard ratio: 1.7 [1.2-2.4]) but not for females.

Conclusions: Individuals starting to receive care (paid or unpaid) and people in the poorest wealth quintile are target groups for interventions aimed at delaying the onset of frailty.

基于护理收据、未满足的护理需求和社会经济不平等的脆弱性风险差异:英国老龄化纵向研究的纵向分析。
背景:老年人口越来越依赖社会照顾,特别是体弱者。然而,据估计,英国有150万65岁以上的人没有得到满足的护理需求。接受照护或照护不足与虚弱状态改变之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:调查护理收据(有偿或无偿)、未满足的护理需求、虚弱状况和死亡率之间的关系。设计:我们使用英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)数据,使用多状态模型来估计虚弱程度增加或减少的风险。协变量包括年龄、性别、财富、地区剥夺、教育程度和婚姻状况。通过接受的护理和自我报告的未满足的护理需求来评估护理状态,而使用虚弱指数来确定虚弱状态。参与者:15003名50岁以上的个人,使用18年(2002-2019)收集的数据。结果:接受护理的个人更容易虚弱,更不可能从虚弱中恢复到不那么虚弱的状态。接受护理的男性从易感向虚弱转变的风险比为2.1 [95% CI: 1.7-2.6],女性为1.8[1.5-2.0]。财富是虚弱状态变化的一个同样有影响力的预测因素:在财富最低的五分之一人群中,没有接受护理的人与那些接受护理的最高财富五分之一人群一样容易变得虚弱。由于接受护理(包括无偿护理)的人的健康状况可能比不接受护理的人差,这突出了最富有和最贫穷的人之间在脆弱风险方面的明显不平等。未满足的护理需求与男性从脆弱到脆弱的转变有关(风险比:1.7[1.2-2.4]),但与女性无关。结论:开始接受护理(有偿或无偿)的个人和最贫穷的五分之一人群是旨在延缓虚弱发作的干预措施的目标群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信