{"title":"Vacuum-assisted closure in secondary wound healing after pilonidal sinus surgery.","authors":"Akyol Hüseyin, Erok Berrin","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2021.0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the utility of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in comparison to standard open wound care in patients operated for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with PSD who underwent standard pilonidal sinus excision-lay open technique/surgery in the Altınbas University School of Medicine Bahcelievler Medical Park Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, between May 2015 and May 2018, were included in this study. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of wound care, including the vacuum-assisted closure group (n=30, postoperative vacuum-assisted closure application) and the control group (n=30, standard open wound care). Wound size, postoperative infection rates and wound healing times were compared between study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental cohort included 60 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between vacuum-assisted closure and the control groups in terms of preoperative and postoperative infection rates (p>0.05). The total recovery time (time to complete wound healing) was significantly shorter in the vacuum-assisted closure group compared with the control group (21.47±4.38 days versus 67.60±7.83 days, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study emphasise that the use of vacuum-assisted closure in PSD patients treated with the lay-open technique seems notable in terms of its potential to shorten the otherwise longer secondary recovery time and thus enables the consideration of the lay-open technique once again among the most preferable methods. However, there is a need for larger scale prospective studies addressing the utility of vacuum-assisted closure in patients with PSD to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup3","pages":"xxxix-xliii"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the utility of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in comparison to standard open wound care in patients operated for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).
Method: Patients with PSD who underwent standard pilonidal sinus excision-lay open technique/surgery in the Altınbas University School of Medicine Bahcelievler Medical Park Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, between May 2015 and May 2018, were included in this study. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of wound care, including the vacuum-assisted closure group (n=30, postoperative vacuum-assisted closure application) and the control group (n=30, standard open wound care). Wound size, postoperative infection rates and wound healing times were compared between study groups.
Results: The experimental cohort included 60 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between vacuum-assisted closure and the control groups in terms of preoperative and postoperative infection rates (p>0.05). The total recovery time (time to complete wound healing) was significantly shorter in the vacuum-assisted closure group compared with the control group (21.47±4.38 days versus 67.60±7.83 days, p=0.001).
Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasise that the use of vacuum-assisted closure in PSD patients treated with the lay-open technique seems notable in terms of its potential to shorten the otherwise longer secondary recovery time and thus enables the consideration of the lay-open technique once again among the most preferable methods. However, there is a need for larger scale prospective studies addressing the utility of vacuum-assisted closure in patients with PSD to validate these findings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.