Sedation management and processed EEG-based solutions during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of key challenges and potential benefits.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lajos Szentgyorgyi, Samuel Henry Howitt, Heather Iles-Smith, Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"Sedation management and processed EEG-based solutions during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of key challenges and potential benefits.","authors":"Lajos Szentgyorgyi, Samuel Henry Howitt, Heather Iles-Smith, Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1007/s10047-025-01494-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique for managing severe cardiorespiratory failure. However, it is invasive and requires profound analgo-sedation during initiation and often throughout the therapy. Managing sedation in venovenous (VV) ECMO patients is particularly challenging due to the impact of ECMO circuits on pharmacokinetics and specific patient requirements. This can lead to unpredictable sedative effects and require multiple drugs at higher doses. Additionally, sedation is usually managed with traditional scoring methods, which are subjective and invalid during neuromuscular blockade. These uncertainties may impact outcomes. Recent clinical practice increasingly focuses on reducing sedation to enable earlier physiotherapy and mobilisation, particularly in patients awaiting transplants or receiving mechanical circulatory support. In this context, processed electroencephalogram-based (pEEG) sedation monitoring might be promising, having shown benefits in general anaesthesia and intensive care. However, the technology has limitations, and its benefits in ECMO practice have yet to be formally evaluated. This review provides insights into the challenges of ECMO sedation, including pharmacokinetics, unique ECMO requirements, and the implications of inadequate sedation scores. Finally, it includes a brief overview of the practicality and limitations of pEEG monitoring during VV-ECMO, highlighting a significant research gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-025-01494-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique for managing severe cardiorespiratory failure. However, it is invasive and requires profound analgo-sedation during initiation and often throughout the therapy. Managing sedation in venovenous (VV) ECMO patients is particularly challenging due to the impact of ECMO circuits on pharmacokinetics and specific patient requirements. This can lead to unpredictable sedative effects and require multiple drugs at higher doses. Additionally, sedation is usually managed with traditional scoring methods, which are subjective and invalid during neuromuscular blockade. These uncertainties may impact outcomes. Recent clinical practice increasingly focuses on reducing sedation to enable earlier physiotherapy and mobilisation, particularly in patients awaiting transplants or receiving mechanical circulatory support. In this context, processed electroencephalogram-based (pEEG) sedation monitoring might be promising, having shown benefits in general anaesthesia and intensive care. However, the technology has limitations, and its benefits in ECMO practice have yet to be formally evaluated. This review provides insights into the challenges of ECMO sedation, including pharmacokinetics, unique ECMO requirements, and the implications of inadequate sedation scores. Finally, it includes a brief overview of the practicality and limitations of pEEG monitoring during VV-ECMO, highlighting a significant research gap.

在静脉-静脉体外膜氧合过程中,镇静管理和基于处理脑电图的解决方案:主要挑战和潜在益处的叙述性回顾。
体外膜氧合(ECMO)是一种成熟的治疗严重心肺衰竭的技术。然而,它是侵入性的,在开始和整个治疗过程中需要深度镇痛镇静。由于ECMO电路对药代动力学和特定患者需求的影响,在静脉静脉ECMO (VV)患者中管理镇静尤其具有挑战性。这可能导致不可预测的镇静效果,需要高剂量的多种药物。此外,镇静通常用传统的评分方法进行管理,这是主观的,在神经肌肉封锁期间无效。这些不确定性可能会影响结果。最近的临床实践越来越侧重于减少镇静,以实现早期物理治疗和活动,特别是在等待移植或接受机械循环支持的患者中。在这种情况下,基于处理脑电图(pEEG)的镇静监测可能是有希望的,在全身麻醉和重症监护中显示出益处。然而,该技术有局限性,其在ECMO实践中的益处尚未得到正式评估。这篇综述提供了ECMO镇静的挑战,包括药代动力学、独特的ECMO要求和镇静评分不充分的影响。最后,简要概述了VV-ECMO期间pEEG监测的实用性和局限性,突出了一个重大的研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Organs
Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信