Marina Mesquita, Luís Cavalheiro, Pedro Ferreira, Rui Soles Gonçalves, Sónia Vicente
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the \"Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire\".","authors":"Marina Mesquita, Luís Cavalheiro, Pedro Ferreira, Rui Soles Gonçalves, Sónia Vicente","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06087-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common problem that occurs among women and increases with age and weight. This study was aimed at cross-culturally adapting and validating the original version of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) into Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The process of cultural and linguistic adaptation and validation followed the guidelines. The obtained Portuguese version was assessed by an expert panel of physiotherapists specialized in women's health. Women with pelvic floor dysfunction also participated in a cognitive pre-test (n = 9). A sample of 50 women with PFD completed the questionnaire to evaluate internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, floor/ceiling effects assessment, and standard error of measurement. Test-retest was assessed with a 2-week interval. The study was approved by the Ethics Commission and all participants signed an informed consent form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty women with a mean age of 53.90 (± 18.57) years, BMI of 27.5 (± 4.2), 55.6% with a bachelor's degree, and all with at least one child, participated in the study. The psychometric properties of the APFQ showed a high Cronbach's alpha for the four domains: bladder (0.837), bowel and sexual function (0.756), pelvic organ prolapse (0.840), and total score (0.714). In terms of reproducibility, intraclass coefficient domain values ranged from 0.934 to 0.976, with a total score of 0.948.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The APFQ was cultural and linguistically adapted and validated for Portuguese. The Portuguese version of the APFQ (APFQ_P) showed acceptable values of validity and good reliability. It can be used in both clinical evaluation and in research on pelvic floor dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06087-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common problem that occurs among women and increases with age and weight. This study was aimed at cross-culturally adapting and validating the original version of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) into Portuguese.
Methods: The process of cultural and linguistic adaptation and validation followed the guidelines. The obtained Portuguese version was assessed by an expert panel of physiotherapists specialized in women's health. Women with pelvic floor dysfunction also participated in a cognitive pre-test (n = 9). A sample of 50 women with PFD completed the questionnaire to evaluate internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, floor/ceiling effects assessment, and standard error of measurement. Test-retest was assessed with a 2-week interval. The study was approved by the Ethics Commission and all participants signed an informed consent form.
Results: Fifty women with a mean age of 53.90 (± 18.57) years, BMI of 27.5 (± 4.2), 55.6% with a bachelor's degree, and all with at least one child, participated in the study. The psychometric properties of the APFQ showed a high Cronbach's alpha for the four domains: bladder (0.837), bowel and sexual function (0.756), pelvic organ prolapse (0.840), and total score (0.714). In terms of reproducibility, intraclass coefficient domain values ranged from 0.934 to 0.976, with a total score of 0.948.
Conclusions: The APFQ was cultural and linguistically adapted and validated for Portuguese. The Portuguese version of the APFQ (APFQ_P) showed acceptable values of validity and good reliability. It can be used in both clinical evaluation and in research on pelvic floor dysfunction.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion