Co-Production of the 'My SJS Passport' to Support Survivors of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) Post Diagnosis and Beyond - A Proof of Concept Study.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Anita Hanson, Lucy Hampson, Jane Evely, Maria Hill, Nathan Elsdon, Thermutis Nadier Lawson, Jane Burns, Daniel F Carr, Andrew Thompson, Jennifer Downing, Munir Pirmohamed
{"title":"Co-Production of the 'My SJS Passport' to Support Survivors of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) Post Diagnosis and Beyond - A Proof of Concept Study.","authors":"Anita Hanson, Lucy Hampson, Jane Evely, Maria Hill, Nathan Elsdon, Thermutis Nadier Lawson, Jane Burns, Daniel F Carr, Andrew Thompson, Jennifer Downing, Munir Pirmohamed","doi":"10.1093/ced/llaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening reactions that cause blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. Survivors can experience long term physical and psychological complications. The 'My SJS Passport' was co-produced by the Patient and Public Involvement group and research team at the Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine to improve the care and experiences of survivors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to implement the 'My SJS Passport' in a real-world setting for evaluation by those with lived experience of SJS/TEN. The objectives were to assess participant's perceptions of its acceptability and utility when used during appointments with healthcare professionals and to explore participants' perceptions of its value and potential barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A proof-of-concept study to evaluate the acceptability and usability of the passport using a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A questionnaire was completed by 19 (86.4%) females and 3 (13.6%) males, while 11/22 participated focus groups. Findings suggest the passport a valuable communication tool, as it acted as the 'patient's voice' and helped in validating diagnosis with healthcare professionals, family and friends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides the first formal evaluation of the passport and showed that the tool is acceptable, functional and of benefit to the user. Minor barriers to implementation were identified, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic and, to a lesser extent, the passport design. There is no comparable tool in use; thus, based on these preliminary findings, it is thought that the passport has a valuable role in supporting this underserved population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llaf088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening reactions that cause blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. Survivors can experience long term physical and psychological complications. The 'My SJS Passport' was co-produced by the Patient and Public Involvement group and research team at the Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine to improve the care and experiences of survivors.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to implement the 'My SJS Passport' in a real-world setting for evaluation by those with lived experience of SJS/TEN. The objectives were to assess participant's perceptions of its acceptability and utility when used during appointments with healthcare professionals and to explore participants' perceptions of its value and potential barriers to implementation.

Methods: A proof-of-concept study to evaluate the acceptability and usability of the passport using a mixed methods approach.

Results: A questionnaire was completed by 19 (86.4%) females and 3 (13.6%) males, while 11/22 participated focus groups. Findings suggest the passport a valuable communication tool, as it acted as the 'patient's voice' and helped in validating diagnosis with healthcare professionals, family and friends.

Conclusion: The study provides the first formal evaluation of the passport and showed that the tool is acceptable, functional and of benefit to the user. Minor barriers to implementation were identified, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic and, to a lesser extent, the passport design. There is no comparable tool in use; thus, based on these preliminary findings, it is thought that the passport has a valuable role in supporting this underserved population.

共同制作“我的SJS护照”,以支持史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)的幸存者诊断后和以后-概念验证研究。
背景:史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)和中毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)是危及生命的反应,可引起皮肤和粘膜起泡。幸存者可能会经历长期的生理和心理并发症。“我的SJS护照”是由患者和公众参与小组和沃尔夫森个性化医疗中心的研究小组共同制作的,旨在改善幸存者的护理和体验。目的:本研究的目的是在现实环境中实施“我的SJS护照”,供有SJS/TEN生活经验的人进行评估。目的是评估参与者在与医疗保健专业人员预约时对其可接受性和效用的看法,并探讨参与者对其价值和实施的潜在障碍的看法。方法:一项概念验证研究,采用混合方法评估护照的可接受性和可用性。结果:共完成问卷调查的女性19人(86.4%),男性3人(13.6%),11/22参与焦点小组。研究结果表明,护照是一种有价值的沟通工具,因为它充当了“病人的声音”,有助于与医疗专业人员、家人和朋友确认诊断。结论:该研究首次对护照进行了正式评估,表明该工具是可接受的,功能齐全,对用户有益。确定了实施方面的一些小障碍,主要是由于COVID-19大流行,在较小程度上是由于护照设计。在使用中没有类似的工具;因此,根据这些初步调查结果,人们认为护照在支持这些服务不足的人口方面发挥了宝贵的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信