Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use of camrelizumab in advanced esophageal cancer: an individual patient data pooled analysis of 987 patients from three prospective cohort studies.
{"title":"Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use of camrelizumab in advanced esophageal cancer: an individual patient data pooled analysis of 987 patients from three prospective cohort studies.","authors":"Zhihao Lu, Guoping Sun, Jiancheng Li, Jun Zhao, Zishu Wang, Dong Qian, Zhe Yang, Na Li, Junsheng Wang, Shuanghu Yuan, Yusheng Wang, Suyi Li, Zhen Yang, Fengming Ran, Yinghua Ji, Shaojin Zhu, Yanqiao Zhang, Chen Wang, Lixin Wan, Rongrong Zheng, Wenjie Deng, Fengzhuo Cheng, Lin Shen","doi":"10.1007/s00262-025-03970-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This individual patient data pooled analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use of camrelizumab in a large cohort of advanced esophageal cancer (AEC) patients.</p><p><strong>Approach and results: </strong>Adult patients (≥ 18 years) who had received camrelizumab as part of AEC treatment were pooled from three independent, prospective observational cohort studies (NCT04616040, ChiCTR1900027275, and ChiCTR2000039499). The main outcomes were patterns of camrelizumab use, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in the overall population and specific subgroups of underrepresented patients. Among 987 patients, 450 (45.6%) received camrelizumab in the first line, 398 (40.3%) in the second line, and 139 (14.1%) in the third line or later. Most (69.7%) patients received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy regardless of treatment lines. The median PFS was 9.9 (95% CI 7.4, 14.4), 6.6 (95% CI 5.1, 8.8), and 5.7 (95% CI 3.1, 9.6) months in the first line, second line, and third line or later, respectively. The corresponding median OS was 15.5 (95% CI 12.6, 18.4), 12.1 (95% CI 10.0, 14.7), and 10.9 (95% CI 8.1, 14.5) months. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥ 2) and with camrelizumab in the second line or later, but not patients with older age (≥ 75 years), were associated with poor survival. Adverse events occurred in 721 (73.0%) patients, with no new safety signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an overview of camrelizumab use in unselected AEC patients. The real-world effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab are generally consistent with those observed in pivotal trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 4","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-03970-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: This individual patient data pooled analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use of camrelizumab in a large cohort of advanced esophageal cancer (AEC) patients.
Approach and results: Adult patients (≥ 18 years) who had received camrelizumab as part of AEC treatment were pooled from three independent, prospective observational cohort studies (NCT04616040, ChiCTR1900027275, and ChiCTR2000039499). The main outcomes were patterns of camrelizumab use, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in the overall population and specific subgroups of underrepresented patients. Among 987 patients, 450 (45.6%) received camrelizumab in the first line, 398 (40.3%) in the second line, and 139 (14.1%) in the third line or later. Most (69.7%) patients received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy regardless of treatment lines. The median PFS was 9.9 (95% CI 7.4, 14.4), 6.6 (95% CI 5.1, 8.8), and 5.7 (95% CI 3.1, 9.6) months in the first line, second line, and third line or later, respectively. The corresponding median OS was 15.5 (95% CI 12.6, 18.4), 12.1 (95% CI 10.0, 14.7), and 10.9 (95% CI 8.1, 14.5) months. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥ 2) and with camrelizumab in the second line or later, but not patients with older age (≥ 75 years), were associated with poor survival. Adverse events occurred in 721 (73.0%) patients, with no new safety signals.
Conclusions: This study provides an overview of camrelizumab use in unselected AEC patients. The real-world effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab are generally consistent with those observed in pivotal trials.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions.
The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.