{"title":"Refining Lineage Classification and Updated RFLP Patterns of PRRSV-2 Revealed Viral Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics in China in 1991–2023","authors":"Xiaoxiao Tian, Ziyi Wei, Mirwaise Khan, Zhi Zhou, Jianqiang Zhang, Xinyi Huang, Yongbo Yang, Shujie Wang, Haiwei Wang, Xuehui Cai, Fandan Meng, Tongqing An","doi":"10.1155/tbed/9977088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a significant infectious disease impacting the global swine industry. Due to high frequency of viral mutation and recombination, PRRSV exhibits complex genetic diversity; however, its lineage classification, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns, and spatiotemporal distribution have not been systematically analyzed in China. In this study, we sequenced PRRSV-2 open reading frame (ORF)5 sequences from clinical samples (<i>n</i> = 364) and retrieved all the available PRRSV-2 ORF5 sequences in China in 1991–2023 from GenBank (<i>n</i> = 5773). Systematically analysis revealed that PRRSV-2 strains in China were classified into five lineages (L1, L3, L5, L8, and L9) and eight sublineages (L1A-L1C, L5A, L5B, L8C, L8E, and L9B), the L8E and L1C PRRSV-2 were widely distributed across almost all provinces in China, the L1C and L1A strains were increasing and gradually replacing L8 as dominant epidemic strains, and L1B PRRSV-2 in China was analyzed for the first time. The L3 PRRSV-2 has a trend of spreading gradually from the southern to the northern provinces, which needs to be paid attention to the monitoring and prevention of PRRSV-2. Meanwhile, PRRSV-2 strains in China were classified into 112 different RFLP patterns. RFLP 1-4-4 PRRSVs were detectable in China, which accounted for 12.71% of all Chinese PRRSV-2 strains. Although they are different from the RFLP 1-4-4 L1C variant in the United States, it is necessary to enhance surveillance of the RFLP 1-4-4 L1C PRRSVs. These results contributed the understanding of genetic diversity and spatiotemporal distribution of PRRSV-2 in China and provide important references for future PRRSV-2 monitoring and control in China.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/9977088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/9977088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a significant infectious disease impacting the global swine industry. Due to high frequency of viral mutation and recombination, PRRSV exhibits complex genetic diversity; however, its lineage classification, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns, and spatiotemporal distribution have not been systematically analyzed in China. In this study, we sequenced PRRSV-2 open reading frame (ORF)5 sequences from clinical samples (n = 364) and retrieved all the available PRRSV-2 ORF5 sequences in China in 1991–2023 from GenBank (n = 5773). Systematically analysis revealed that PRRSV-2 strains in China were classified into five lineages (L1, L3, L5, L8, and L9) and eight sublineages (L1A-L1C, L5A, L5B, L8C, L8E, and L9B), the L8E and L1C PRRSV-2 were widely distributed across almost all provinces in China, the L1C and L1A strains were increasing and gradually replacing L8 as dominant epidemic strains, and L1B PRRSV-2 in China was analyzed for the first time. The L3 PRRSV-2 has a trend of spreading gradually from the southern to the northern provinces, which needs to be paid attention to the monitoring and prevention of PRRSV-2. Meanwhile, PRRSV-2 strains in China were classified into 112 different RFLP patterns. RFLP 1-4-4 PRRSVs were detectable in China, which accounted for 12.71% of all Chinese PRRSV-2 strains. Although they are different from the RFLP 1-4-4 L1C variant in the United States, it is necessary to enhance surveillance of the RFLP 1-4-4 L1C PRRSVs. These results contributed the understanding of genetic diversity and spatiotemporal distribution of PRRSV-2 in China and provide important references for future PRRSV-2 monitoring and control in China.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.