Mariana Lima da Costa Valente, Lívia Maiumi Uehara, Rodolfo Lisboa Batalha, Claudemiro Bolfarini, Rayana Longo Bighetti Trevisan, Roger Rodrigo Fernandes, Marcio Mateus Beloti, Andréa Cândido dos Reis
{"title":"Current Perspectives on Additive Manufacturing and Titanium Surface Nanotopography in Bone Formation","authors":"Mariana Lima da Costa Valente, Lívia Maiumi Uehara, Rodolfo Lisboa Batalha, Claudemiro Bolfarini, Rayana Longo Bighetti Trevisan, Roger Rodrigo Fernandes, Marcio Mateus Beloti, Andréa Cândido dos Reis","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the impact of manufacturing methods (conventional and additive manufacturing) and surface treatments (polished and nanotopographic) on the physicochemical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy and their correlation with osteoblast cellular behavior. The evaluated groups were Machined Discs (MD), Machined Discs with Treatment (MD-WT), Additive-manufactured Discs (AD), and Additive-manufactured Discs with Treatment (AD-WT). Surface analyses included SEM, AFM, surface roughness, EDS, XRD, surface free energy, and zeta potential. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured for biological assessments, including cell morphology, viability, gene expression, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mineralization. ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests were applied (<i>p</i> < 0.05). MD exhibited grooved topography, AD had partially fused spherical particles, while MD-WT and AD-WT showed patterns from chemical treatment (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + NaOH). EDS identified additional ions in MD-WT and AD-WT. XRD patterns indicated crystal lattice orientation differences. MD-WT and AD-WT displayed higher surface free energy than MD and AD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). AD had greater roughness (Sa 6.98 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Biological analyses revealed higher cell viability for MD and AD (<i>p</i> < 0.001), higher ALP activity in MD, and lower in AD-WT. Gene expression varied, with MD showing higher <i>Alpl</i>, <i>Ibsp</i>, and <i>Bglap</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and AD-WT showing higher <i>Runx2</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mineralized matrix behavior was similar for MD, AD, and MD-WT (<i>p</i> > 0.05). MD and AD surfaces demonstrated superior osteogenic differentiation potential, while AD exhibited greater roughness, lower surface free energy, higher cell viability, and osteoblastic differentiation potential.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of manufacturing methods (conventional and additive manufacturing) and surface treatments (polished and nanotopographic) on the physicochemical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy and their correlation with osteoblast cellular behavior. The evaluated groups were Machined Discs (MD), Machined Discs with Treatment (MD-WT), Additive-manufactured Discs (AD), and Additive-manufactured Discs with Treatment (AD-WT). Surface analyses included SEM, AFM, surface roughness, EDS, XRD, surface free energy, and zeta potential. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured for biological assessments, including cell morphology, viability, gene expression, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mineralization. ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests were applied (p < 0.05). MD exhibited grooved topography, AD had partially fused spherical particles, while MD-WT and AD-WT showed patterns from chemical treatment (H3PO4 + NaOH). EDS identified additional ions in MD-WT and AD-WT. XRD patterns indicated crystal lattice orientation differences. MD-WT and AD-WT displayed higher surface free energy than MD and AD (p < 0.05). AD had greater roughness (Sa 6.98 μm, p < 0.05). Biological analyses revealed higher cell viability for MD and AD (p < 0.001), higher ALP activity in MD, and lower in AD-WT. Gene expression varied, with MD showing higher Alpl, Ibsp, and Bglap (p < 0.001), and AD-WT showing higher Runx2 (p < 0.001). Mineralized matrix behavior was similar for MD, AD, and MD-WT (p > 0.05). MD and AD surfaces demonstrated superior osteogenic differentiation potential, while AD exhibited greater roughness, lower surface free energy, higher cell viability, and osteoblastic differentiation potential.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats:
• original research reports
• short research and development reports
• scientific reviews
• current concepts articles
• special reports
• editorials
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.