Current Perspectives on Additive Manufacturing and Titanium Surface Nanotopography in Bone Formation

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mariana Lima da Costa Valente, Lívia Maiumi Uehara, Rodolfo Lisboa Batalha, Claudemiro Bolfarini, Rayana Longo Bighetti Trevisan, Roger Rodrigo Fernandes, Marcio Mateus Beloti, Andréa Cândido dos Reis
{"title":"Current Perspectives on Additive Manufacturing and Titanium Surface Nanotopography in Bone Formation","authors":"Mariana Lima da Costa Valente,&nbsp;Lívia Maiumi Uehara,&nbsp;Rodolfo Lisboa Batalha,&nbsp;Claudemiro Bolfarini,&nbsp;Rayana Longo Bighetti Trevisan,&nbsp;Roger Rodrigo Fernandes,&nbsp;Marcio Mateus Beloti,&nbsp;Andréa Cândido dos Reis","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the impact of manufacturing methods (conventional and additive manufacturing) and surface treatments (polished and nanotopographic) on the physicochemical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy and their correlation with osteoblast cellular behavior. The evaluated groups were Machined Discs (MD), Machined Discs with Treatment (MD-WT), Additive-manufactured Discs (AD), and Additive-manufactured Discs with Treatment (AD-WT). Surface analyses included SEM, AFM, surface roughness, EDS, XRD, surface free energy, and zeta potential. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured for biological assessments, including cell morphology, viability, gene expression, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mineralization. ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests were applied (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). MD exhibited grooved topography, AD had partially fused spherical particles, while MD-WT and AD-WT showed patterns from chemical treatment (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + NaOH). EDS identified additional ions in MD-WT and AD-WT. XRD patterns indicated crystal lattice orientation differences. MD-WT and AD-WT displayed higher surface free energy than MD and AD (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). AD had greater roughness (Sa 6.98 μm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Biological analyses revealed higher cell viability for MD and AD (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), higher ALP activity in MD, and lower in AD-WT. Gene expression varied, with MD showing higher <i>Alpl</i>, <i>Ibsp</i>, and <i>Bglap</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and AD-WT showing higher <i>Runx2</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Mineralized matrix behavior was similar for MD, AD, and MD-WT (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). MD and AD surfaces demonstrated superior osteogenic differentiation potential, while AD exhibited greater roughness, lower surface free energy, higher cell viability, and osteoblastic differentiation potential.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the impact of manufacturing methods (conventional and additive manufacturing) and surface treatments (polished and nanotopographic) on the physicochemical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy and their correlation with osteoblast cellular behavior. The evaluated groups were Machined Discs (MD), Machined Discs with Treatment (MD-WT), Additive-manufactured Discs (AD), and Additive-manufactured Discs with Treatment (AD-WT). Surface analyses included SEM, AFM, surface roughness, EDS, XRD, surface free energy, and zeta potential. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured for biological assessments, including cell morphology, viability, gene expression, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mineralization. ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests were applied (p < 0.05). MD exhibited grooved topography, AD had partially fused spherical particles, while MD-WT and AD-WT showed patterns from chemical treatment (H3PO4 + NaOH). EDS identified additional ions in MD-WT and AD-WT. XRD patterns indicated crystal lattice orientation differences. MD-WT and AD-WT displayed higher surface free energy than MD and AD (p < 0.05). AD had greater roughness (Sa 6.98 μm, p < 0.05). Biological analyses revealed higher cell viability for MD and AD (p < 0.001), higher ALP activity in MD, and lower in AD-WT. Gene expression varied, with MD showing higher Alpl, Ibsp, and Bglap (p < 0.001), and AD-WT showing higher Runx2 (p < 0.001). Mineralized matrix behavior was similar for MD, AD, and MD-WT (p > 0.05). MD and AD surfaces demonstrated superior osteogenic differentiation potential, while AD exhibited greater roughness, lower surface free energy, higher cell viability, and osteoblastic differentiation potential.

增材制造和钛表面纳米形貌在骨形成中的研究进展
本研究旨在评估制造方法(常规制造和增材制造)和表面处理(抛光和纳米形貌)对Ti6Al4V合金理化性能的影响及其与成骨细胞行为的相关性。评估组为机械加工椎间盘(MD)、机械加工椎间盘(MD- wt)、添加剂加工椎间盘(AD)和添加剂加工椎间盘(AD- wt)。表面分析包括SEM, AFM,表面粗糙度,EDS, XRD,表面自由能和zeta势。培养MC3T3-E1细胞进行生物学评估,包括细胞形态、活力、基因表达、碱性磷酸酶活性和矿化。采用方差分析和Holm-Sidak检验(p < 0.05)。MD表现为沟槽状形貌,AD表现为部分融合的球形颗粒,MD- wt和AD- wt表现为化学处理(H3PO4 + NaOH)的形貌。EDS在MD-WT和AD-WT中发现了额外的离子。XRD图谱显示了晶体晶格取向的差异。MD- wt和AD- wt的表面自由能高于MD和AD (p < 0.05)。AD的粗糙度更大(Sa 6.98 μm, p < 0.05)。生物学分析显示MD和AD的细胞活力较高(p < 0.001), MD的ALP活性较高,AD- wt的ALP活性较低。基因表达不同,MD表现出较高的Alpl、Ibsp和Bglap (p < 0.001), AD-WT表现出较高的Runx2 (p < 0.001)。矿化基质行为在MD、AD和MD- wt中相似(p > 0.05)。MD和AD表面表现出更好的成骨分化潜力,而AD表面表现出更大的粗糙度、更低的表面自由能、更高的细胞活力和成骨分化潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信