Teachers and teacher training for inclusive pedagogies in England. Mainstream and SEND schools providing their own solutions

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Fiona Smythe
{"title":"Teachers and teacher training for inclusive pedagogies in England. Mainstream and SEND schools providing their own solutions","authors":"Fiona Smythe","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.12574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In England, a vertical equity model of inclusive schooling has been increasingly visible in both educational policy and school practices since the 2019 education reforms. Within this mixed model of provision, alongside and in complementarity to mainstream schooling, alternative provision (AP) and special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) settings offer schooling for disabled or excluded children. Within this national context, teachers across mainstream, AP and SEND schools were interviewed in a 2021-2022 study about their views and experiences of training for inclusive pedagogies. The findings reveal that teachers across the sectors face similar problems, such as a lack of time for further training in inclusive pedagogies and the difficulty of meeting all pupils' needs (both those with and without SEND). Teachers in both mainstream and specialised settings favoured in-house training to promote specific skills, while those working in the AP and SEND sectors also wanted more sharing of best practices through inter-school networks. Both mainstream and specialised settings further identified a place for university-based training in supporting teachers' understanding of diversity and inclusion, in addition to schools-based professional development. Teachers' views suggest that initial teacher training insufficiently prepares teachers for working with diverse pupils, and it is only by real-world practice that effective skills are developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.12574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In England, a vertical equity model of inclusive schooling has been increasingly visible in both educational policy and school practices since the 2019 education reforms. Within this mixed model of provision, alongside and in complementarity to mainstream schooling, alternative provision (AP) and special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) settings offer schooling for disabled or excluded children. Within this national context, teachers across mainstream, AP and SEND schools were interviewed in a 2021-2022 study about their views and experiences of training for inclusive pedagogies. The findings reveal that teachers across the sectors face similar problems, such as a lack of time for further training in inclusive pedagogies and the difficulty of meeting all pupils' needs (both those with and without SEND). Teachers in both mainstream and specialised settings favoured in-house training to promote specific skills, while those working in the AP and SEND sectors also wanted more sharing of best practices through inter-school networks. Both mainstream and specialised settings further identified a place for university-based training in supporting teachers' understanding of diversity and inclusion, in addition to schools-based professional development. Teachers' views suggest that initial teacher training insufficiently prepares teachers for working with diverse pupils, and it is only by real-world practice that effective skills are developed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

英国全纳教学法的教师和教师培训。主流学校和SEND学校提供自己的解决方案
在英国,自2019年教育改革以来,包容性教育的纵向公平模式在教育政策和学校实践中越来越明显。在这种混合模式下,除了主流学校教育之外,替代教育(AP)和特殊教育需求和残疾(SEND)设置还为残疾或被排斥的儿童提供学校教育。在这一国家背景下,在2021-2022年的研究中,我们采访了主流学校、AP学校和SEND学校的教师,了解他们对包容性教学法培训的看法和经验。调查结果显示,各个部门的教师都面临着类似的问题,例如缺乏时间进行包容性教学法的进一步培训,以及难以满足所有学生的需求(包括有和没有SEND的学生)。主流和专业环境的教师都倾向于内部培训,以提高特定技能,而在AP和SEND部门工作的教师也希望通过校际网络更多地分享最佳实践。除了以学校为基础的专业发展外,主流和专业环境都进一步确定了以大学为基础的培训,以支持教师对多样性和包容性的理解。教师的观点表明,最初的教师培训不足以使教师为与不同的学生一起工作做好准备,只有通过现实世界的实践才能培养有效的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信