AI Safety for Physical Infrastructures: A Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Approach

IF 3.1 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Fariborz Farahmand, Richard W. Neu
{"title":"AI Safety for Physical Infrastructures: A Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Approach","authors":"Fariborz Farahmand,&nbsp;Richard W. Neu","doi":"10.1111/ffe.14575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Where AI systems are increasingly and rapidly impacting engineering, science, and our daily lives, progress in AI safety for physical infrastructures is lagging. Most of the research and educational programs on AI safety do not consider that, in today's connected world, safety and security in physical infrastructures are increasingly entangled. This technical note sheds light, for the first time, on how computer science and engineering communities, for example, mechanical and civil, can collaborate on addressing AI safety issues in the physical infrastructures and the mutual benefits of this collaboration. We offer examples of how probabilistic views of engineers on safety can contribute to quantifying critical parameters such as “threshold” and “safety buffer” in the AI safety models, developed by the world-leading computer scientists. We also offer examples of how novel AI and machine learning tools, for example, <i>do</i>-operator, a mathematical operator for intervention (vs. conditioning); <i>do</i>-calculus, machinery of causal calculus; and physics-informed neural networks with a small number of samples can help fatigue and fracture research. We envision AI safety as a process, not an object, and contribute to realizing this vision by initiating a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach in establishing this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"48 4","pages":"1919-1928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ffe.14575","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.14575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Where AI systems are increasingly and rapidly impacting engineering, science, and our daily lives, progress in AI safety for physical infrastructures is lagging. Most of the research and educational programs on AI safety do not consider that, in today's connected world, safety and security in physical infrastructures are increasingly entangled. This technical note sheds light, for the first time, on how computer science and engineering communities, for example, mechanical and civil, can collaborate on addressing AI safety issues in the physical infrastructures and the mutual benefits of this collaboration. We offer examples of how probabilistic views of engineers on safety can contribute to quantifying critical parameters such as “threshold” and “safety buffer” in the AI safety models, developed by the world-leading computer scientists. We also offer examples of how novel AI and machine learning tools, for example, do-operator, a mathematical operator for intervention (vs. conditioning); do-calculus, machinery of causal calculus; and physics-informed neural networks with a small number of samples can help fatigue and fracture research. We envision AI safety as a process, not an object, and contribute to realizing this vision by initiating a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach in establishing this process.

Abstract Image

物理基础设施的人工智能安全:协作和跨学科方法
人工智能系统正日益迅速地影响着工程、科学和我们的日常生活,但在物理基础设施的人工智能安全方面的进展却滞后。大多数关于人工智能安全的研究和教育项目都没有考虑到,在当今互联世界中,物理基础设施的安全和安保日益纠缠在一起。本技术说明首次阐明了计算机科学和工程社区(例如机械和土木)如何合作解决物理基础设施中的人工智能安全问题以及这种合作的互利。我们提供了一些例子,说明工程师对安全的概率观点如何有助于量化由世界领先的计算机科学家开发的人工智能安全模型中的关键参数,如“阈值”和“安全缓冲”。我们还提供了一些新的人工智能和机器学习工具的例子,例如,do-operator,用于干预(相对于条件反射)的数学算子;因果演算的机制;而基于少量样本的物理信息神经网络可以帮助疲劳和断裂研究。我们将人工智能安全视为一个过程,而不是一个对象,并通过在建立这一过程中启动协作和跨学科方法,为实现这一愿景做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
256
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信