Mitochondrial DNA for Phylogeny Building: Assessing Individual and Grouped mtGenes as Proxies for the mtGenome in Platyrrhines

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Natalie Finnegan, Marcela G. M. Lima, Jessica W. Lynch
{"title":"Mitochondrial DNA for Phylogeny Building: Assessing Individual and Grouped mtGenes as Proxies for the mtGenome in Platyrrhines","authors":"Natalie Finnegan,&nbsp;Marcela G. M. Lima,&nbsp;Jessica W. Lynch","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Phylogenetic trees are analytic tools used in primate studies to elucidate evolutionary relationships. Because of its relative ease to sequence and rapid evolution compared to nuclear genomes, mitochondrial DNA is frequently used for phylogeny building. This project evaluated the effectiveness of using individual or grouped mitochondrial genes (mtGenes) as a proxy for the mitochondrial genome (mtGenome) in phylogeny building within two nested primate datasets, Cebidae and Platyrrhini, with differing divergence dates. mtGene utility rankings were determined based on congruence values to the mtGenome tree. mtGenes trees were also assessed on tree resolution and ability to sort nested clades. We found that most individual mtGenes, including ribosomal genes (12S and 16S), COX genes, most ND genes, and <span>d</span>-Loop are not appropriate for use as proxies for the mtGenome when tree building in either the Cebidae or Platyrrhini set. On average, grouped mtGenes outperformed individual mtGenes in both sets, and mtGene and grouped mtGene rankings varied between sets. Pairing CYB and COX3 together or pairing ND2 and CYB worked well in both the Cebidae set and the Platyrrhini set. We also found that nucleotide diversity is not a predictor of mtGene performance. Instead, it may be that unique mtGene or mtGene system evolutionary history impacts mtGene performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"87 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees are analytic tools used in primate studies to elucidate evolutionary relationships. Because of its relative ease to sequence and rapid evolution compared to nuclear genomes, mitochondrial DNA is frequently used for phylogeny building. This project evaluated the effectiveness of using individual or grouped mitochondrial genes (mtGenes) as a proxy for the mitochondrial genome (mtGenome) in phylogeny building within two nested primate datasets, Cebidae and Platyrrhini, with differing divergence dates. mtGene utility rankings were determined based on congruence values to the mtGenome tree. mtGenes trees were also assessed on tree resolution and ability to sort nested clades. We found that most individual mtGenes, including ribosomal genes (12S and 16S), COX genes, most ND genes, and d-Loop are not appropriate for use as proxies for the mtGenome when tree building in either the Cebidae or Platyrrhini set. On average, grouped mtGenes outperformed individual mtGenes in both sets, and mtGene and grouped mtGene rankings varied between sets. Pairing CYB and COX3 together or pairing ND2 and CYB worked well in both the Cebidae set and the Platyrrhini set. We also found that nucleotide diversity is not a predictor of mtGene performance. Instead, it may be that unique mtGene or mtGene system evolutionary history impacts mtGene performance.

Abstract Image

线粒体DNA用于系统发育的构建:评估单个和组mtgene作为Platyrrhines mtGenome的代理
系统发育树是灵长类动物研究中用来阐明进化关系的分析工具。由于与核基因组相比,线粒体DNA相对容易测序和快速进化,因此经常用于系统发育的构建。本项目评估了使用单个或组线粒体基因(mtGenes)作为线粒体基因组(mtGenome)的代理,在两个嵌套灵长类数据集(Cebidae和Platyrrhini)中进行系统发育构建的有效性,这些数据集具有不同的分化日期。根据mtGenome树的同余值确定mtGene效用排名。mtGenes树还评估了树的分辨率和对嵌套枝的分类能力。我们发现,大多数个体mtGenes,包括核糖体基因(12S和16S), COX基因,大多数ND基因和d-Loop基因,都不适合作为mtGenome的代理,当在Cebidae或Platyrrhini集合中构建树时。平均而言,分组mtGenes在两组中的表现都优于单个mtGenes,并且mtGene和分组mtGene的排名在两组之间有所不同。CYB和COX3的配对或ND2和CYB的配对在头足科和颈足科都有良好的效果。我们还发现核苷酸多样性并不是mtGene表现的预测因子。相反,可能是独特的mtGene或mtGene系统进化史影响了mtGene的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信