The Possibility of Health Care Directives for Vaccinations—A Consultation Study With Relevant Stakeholders

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Michelle M. Porter, Mary J. Shariff
{"title":"The Possibility of Health Care Directives for Vaccinations—A Consultation Study With Relevant Stakeholders","authors":"Michelle M. Porter,&nbsp;Mary J. Shariff","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Health care directives allow individuals to express their wishes about future health care treatments if they become unable to communicate their wishes (e.g., due to cognitive impairment). Because vaccinations have become contentious preventative treatments whereby future wishes might not be honored by others, vaccinations should be given specific consideration for potential inclusion in health care directives. The purpose of this project was to explore and receive preliminary feedback on: the idea of vaccination-specific directives; support for draft statements; and practical implications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted two discrete online surveys with individuals in professions engaging with health care directives (e.g., health care, long-term care, and legal), as well as advocates for older adults, in 2023 and 2024. In the first survey (<i>n</i> = 39), we canvassed initial reactions to the idea of vaccination-specific directives and requested feedback on draft statements. Using an iterative approach, we analyzed the first survey to craft the second survey (<i>n</i> = 151), to receive feedback on a revised directive statement, and to identify dominant themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, there was broad support for the idea of vaccination-specific directives. In the first survey, 87.2% agreed that it made sense to them. In the second survey, 83.3% of respondents agreed that the proposed statement was clear, with 72.0% indicating “yes” that the statement would result in a person receiving vaccines. Dominant themes across both surveys included logistical challenges with directives; whether wishes would be honored; and the need for public and professional education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Professionals and advocates for older persons indicated significant support for the development and use of vaccination-specific directives. Accordingly, persons who wish to be vaccinated should consider creating such a directive, as it may better advance their wishes and reduce family stress and conflict by providing clear direction in future circumstances—which could include encountering anti-vaccination sentiment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70559","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Health care directives allow individuals to express their wishes about future health care treatments if they become unable to communicate their wishes (e.g., due to cognitive impairment). Because vaccinations have become contentious preventative treatments whereby future wishes might not be honored by others, vaccinations should be given specific consideration for potential inclusion in health care directives. The purpose of this project was to explore and receive preliminary feedback on: the idea of vaccination-specific directives; support for draft statements; and practical implications.

Methods

We conducted two discrete online surveys with individuals in professions engaging with health care directives (e.g., health care, long-term care, and legal), as well as advocates for older adults, in 2023 and 2024. In the first survey (n = 39), we canvassed initial reactions to the idea of vaccination-specific directives and requested feedback on draft statements. Using an iterative approach, we analyzed the first survey to craft the second survey (n = 151), to receive feedback on a revised directive statement, and to identify dominant themes.

Results

Overall, there was broad support for the idea of vaccination-specific directives. In the first survey, 87.2% agreed that it made sense to them. In the second survey, 83.3% of respondents agreed that the proposed statement was clear, with 72.0% indicating “yes” that the statement would result in a person receiving vaccines. Dominant themes across both surveys included logistical challenges with directives; whether wishes would be honored; and the need for public and professional education.

Conclusions

Professionals and advocates for older persons indicated significant support for the development and use of vaccination-specific directives. Accordingly, persons who wish to be vaccinated should consider creating such a directive, as it may better advance their wishes and reduce family stress and conflict by providing clear direction in future circumstances—which could include encountering anti-vaccination sentiment.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信