Undergraduate general medicine education in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of medical trainees' perspectives

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hirohisa Fujikawa MD, PhD, Hidetaka Tamune MD, PhD, Yuji Nishizaki MD, MPH, PhD, Kiyoshi Shikino MD, MHPE, PhD, Taro Shimizu MD, MSc, MPH, MBA, PhD, Yu Yamamoto MD, Yasuharu Tokuda MD, MPH
{"title":"Undergraduate general medicine education in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of medical trainees' perspectives","authors":"Hirohisa Fujikawa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hidetaka Tamune MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yuji Nishizaki MD, MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Shikino MD, MHPE, PhD,&nbsp;Taro Shimizu MD, MSc, MPH, MBA, PhD,&nbsp;Yu Yamamoto MD,&nbsp;Yasuharu Tokuda MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The 2022 revised version of the Model Core Curriculum (MCC) for Medical Education in Japan includes “generalism” as a new expertise quality and ability, based on the results of surveys of experts in health professions education. However, the perspectives of medical trainees under the pre-2022 MCC revision were under-examined. Here, we investigated what these trainees felt they had learned about general medicine (GM)-related topics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study using an anonymous online questionnaire, which was developed with reference to the 2022 revised MCC. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items. For all items, we asked, “Did you learn enough during medical school?” Respondents were asked to respond on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred and eighty-six participants (response rate 55.4%) were included in the analysis. For the item “Behavioral science,” the number of participants who chose “3 = neither agree nor disagree” was highest, at 171 (44.3%) and with an average of 3.28, indicating that this item was perceived as insufficiently studied. Approximately half of the participants chose “4 = agree” for all items other than “Behavioral science.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study suggested that behavioral science may be underlearned among medical trainees of the pre-2022 MCC generation. Medical educators in Japan should formulate curricula in accordance with the 2022 revision MCC and improve curricula regarding behavioral science. Future research should survey the generation of trainees who receive 2022 revision MCC-compliant medical education; comparison of results with those of this study would be valuable in examining the effects of the revised guideline and inform international medical educators.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"148-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.752","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgf2.752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The 2022 revised version of the Model Core Curriculum (MCC) for Medical Education in Japan includes “generalism” as a new expertise quality and ability, based on the results of surveys of experts in health professions education. However, the perspectives of medical trainees under the pre-2022 MCC revision were under-examined. Here, we investigated what these trainees felt they had learned about general medicine (GM)-related topics.

Methods

We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study using an anonymous online questionnaire, which was developed with reference to the 2022 revised MCC. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items. For all items, we asked, “Did you learn enough during medical school?” Respondents were asked to respond on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).

Results

Three hundred and eighty-six participants (response rate 55.4%) were included in the analysis. For the item “Behavioral science,” the number of participants who chose “3 = neither agree nor disagree” was highest, at 171 (44.3%) and with an average of 3.28, indicating that this item was perceived as insufficiently studied. Approximately half of the participants chose “4 = agree” for all items other than “Behavioral science.”

Conclusions

The study suggested that behavioral science may be underlearned among medical trainees of the pre-2022 MCC generation. Medical educators in Japan should formulate curricula in accordance with the 2022 revision MCC and improve curricula regarding behavioral science. Future research should survey the generation of trainees who receive 2022 revision MCC-compliant medical education; comparison of results with those of this study would be valuable in examining the effects of the revised guideline and inform international medical educators.

Abstract Image

日本的本科全科医学教育:全国范围内对医学实习生观点的横断面调查
根据对卫生专业教育专家的调查结果,日本2022年修订的医学教育核心课程(MCC)将“通才”作为一项新的专业素质和能力。然而,在2022年以前的MCC修订下,医疗培训生的观点没有得到充分审查。在这里,我们调查了这些受训者认为他们对普通医学(GM)相关主题的了解。方法采用匿名在线问卷进行全国性横断面研究,该问卷参照2022年修订的MCC制定。问卷共14个项目。对于所有项目,我们都问:“你在医学院学得够多吗?”受访者被要求以5分的李克特量表(从1 =非常不同意到5 =非常同意)做出回应。结果共纳入386例,有效率为55.4%。对于“行为科学”一项,选择“3 =既不同意也不反对”的参与者人数最多,为171人(44.3%),平均为3.28人,表明该项目被认为研究不足。除了“行为科学”之外,大约一半的参与者选择了“4 =同意”。结论2022年前MCC一代医学实习生行为科学学习可能不足。日本医学教育工作者应根据2022年修订的MCC制定课程,并改进行为科学方面的课程。未来的研究应调查接受2022年修订的符合mcc的医学教育的一代学员;将结果与本研究的结果进行比较,将有助于检验修订后指南的效果,并为国际医学教育工作者提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信