Development and evaluation of a multivariable prediction model for overall survival in advanced stage pulmonary carcinoid using machine learning

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109729
Huiping Dai , Guang Li , Cheng Zhang , Qi Huo , Tingting Tang , Fei Ding , Jianjun Wang , Guangliang Duan
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a multivariable prediction model for overall survival in advanced stage pulmonary carcinoid using machine learning","authors":"Huiping Dai ,&nbsp;Guang Li ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Qi Huo ,&nbsp;Tingting Tang ,&nbsp;Fei Ding ,&nbsp;Jianjun Wang ,&nbsp;Guangliang Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence is limited on whether patients with advanced pulmonary carcinoid (APC) benefit from comprehensive pulmonary resection (CPR), chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Existing prognostic models for APC are limited and do not guide treatment selection. This study aims to develop and evaluate a multivariable machine learning model to predict overall survival in APC patients and provide a web-based prognostic tool.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical data of APC patients were obtained from SEER database. Propensity score matching reduced retrospective study bias. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated survival differences between CPR vs. nonCPR, chemotherapy (Chem) vs. no chemotherapy (nonChem), and radiotherapy (Radio) vs. no radiotherapy (nonRadio). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression identified survival-associated variables. Using these clinical variables, 91 machine learning models were developed to predict APC survival, and the best model led to a web-based prognostic tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 1077 APC patients, 37.0 % underwent CPR, 30.2 % received chemotherapy, and 19.9 % received radiotherapy. After matching, overall survival was significantly improved in the CPR compared to the nonCPR. However, there were no significant differences in survival between the Chem and nonChem groups or between the Radio and nonRadio groups. Eight out of 13 clinical variables were significant prognostic variables. Models with eight variables reached a mean C-index of 0.770 and a 5-year AUC of 0.835. Using all 13 variables, a C-index of 0.785 and an AUC of 0.850 was achieved. An online tool (<span><span>https://apcmodel.shinyapps.io/APCsp/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) displays survival curves for different treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The developed prognostic model enables individualized survival predictions and supports evidence-based treatment decisions for APC patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 7","pages":"Article 109729"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074879832500157X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Evidence is limited on whether patients with advanced pulmonary carcinoid (APC) benefit from comprehensive pulmonary resection (CPR), chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Existing prognostic models for APC are limited and do not guide treatment selection. This study aims to develop and evaluate a multivariable machine learning model to predict overall survival in APC patients and provide a web-based prognostic tool.

Methods

Clinical data of APC patients were obtained from SEER database. Propensity score matching reduced retrospective study bias. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated survival differences between CPR vs. nonCPR, chemotherapy (Chem) vs. no chemotherapy (nonChem), and radiotherapy (Radio) vs. no radiotherapy (nonRadio). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression identified survival-associated variables. Using these clinical variables, 91 machine learning models were developed to predict APC survival, and the best model led to a web-based prognostic tool.

Results

Among 1077 APC patients, 37.0 % underwent CPR, 30.2 % received chemotherapy, and 19.9 % received radiotherapy. After matching, overall survival was significantly improved in the CPR compared to the nonCPR. However, there were no significant differences in survival between the Chem and nonChem groups or between the Radio and nonRadio groups. Eight out of 13 clinical variables were significant prognostic variables. Models with eight variables reached a mean C-index of 0.770 and a 5-year AUC of 0.835. Using all 13 variables, a C-index of 0.785 and an AUC of 0.850 was achieved. An online tool (https://apcmodel.shinyapps.io/APCsp/) displays survival curves for different treatments.

Conclusion

The developed prognostic model enables individualized survival predictions and supports evidence-based treatment decisions for APC patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信