{"title":"Carbon emission analysis of ecological slope protection based on lifecycle theory and sobol method","authors":"Xu Jiangbo , Wu Xiong , Qiao Wei , Wang Shaowei , Chen Xinyu , Zhao Danni , Zeng Xianglong , Shu Sheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To analyze the main contributors to carbon emissions throughout the lifecycle of ecological slope protection, this study employed a novel lifecycle carbon emission assessment model alongside the Sobol method. The emissions across various project stages were calculated, and the sensitivity of different emission sources was analyzed, resulting in targeted reduction strategies. The findings indicate that the total carbon emissions for ecological slope protection over its lifecycle reached 4338.20 tons, with 4470.12 tons emitted during the construction phase and 131.92 tons absorbed during maintenance. The retaining wall and anchor beam slope protection projects accounted for approximately 75 % of construction emissions, while vegetation contributed to the absorption of around 3 % of the project's carbon emissions. Sensitivity analysis revealed that rebar and C30 concrete were the most significant carbon emission sources. The results demonstrate that ecological slope protection offers a substantial carbon reduction effect compared to other slope protection methods. The construction phase is critical for controlling emissions, with a focus on reducing carbon emissions during material production. Strategies should include improvements in raw materials, production processes, and product quality. Additionally, selecting native plants and implementing a reasonable maintenance plan can further enhance carbon reduction effectiveness. This study provides theoretical support and technical references for the design and construction of ecological slope protection projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To analyze the main contributors to carbon emissions throughout the lifecycle of ecological slope protection, this study employed a novel lifecycle carbon emission assessment model alongside the Sobol method. The emissions across various project stages were calculated, and the sensitivity of different emission sources was analyzed, resulting in targeted reduction strategies. The findings indicate that the total carbon emissions for ecological slope protection over its lifecycle reached 4338.20 tons, with 4470.12 tons emitted during the construction phase and 131.92 tons absorbed during maintenance. The retaining wall and anchor beam slope protection projects accounted for approximately 75 % of construction emissions, while vegetation contributed to the absorption of around 3 % of the project's carbon emissions. Sensitivity analysis revealed that rebar and C30 concrete were the most significant carbon emission sources. The results demonstrate that ecological slope protection offers a substantial carbon reduction effect compared to other slope protection methods. The construction phase is critical for controlling emissions, with a focus on reducing carbon emissions during material production. Strategies should include improvements in raw materials, production processes, and product quality. Additionally, selecting native plants and implementing a reasonable maintenance plan can further enhance carbon reduction effectiveness. This study provides theoretical support and technical references for the design and construction of ecological slope protection projects.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.