Looking under the hood—How incumbent characteristics reduce the innovation impact of trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes for battery electric vehicles

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Hauke Luetkehaus
{"title":"Looking under the hood—How incumbent characteristics reduce the innovation impact of trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes for battery electric vehicles","authors":"Hauke Luetkehaus","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policymakers increasingly implement trajectory-changing demand-pull policies that support the emergence of technologies outside old innovation trajectories. While previous studies provide important insights into how such demand-pull policies drive innovation, we lack a detailed understanding of the role of incumbents' heterogeneity. Understanding the determinants of incumbents' responses to trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes is valuable, as these firms might hinder but also enable sustainability transitions. We introduce the idea of demand-pull policy mixes and then investigate how incumbents' characteristics shape the impact of demand-pull policy mixes on incumbents' innovation activity. Building on the literature on incumbent adaptation, we find empirical evidence that incumbents' technological capabilities, firm performance, and commitment to old technology can inhibit the impact of trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes on their innovation activity. This highlights that policy impacts depend on incumbents' heterogeneity and, thus, on the incumbent firm population within a country. In addition, the effectiveness of trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes may be enhanced by the use of phase-out and technology-push policies. However, some policies that are considered destabilizing for old technologies may be less effective than assumed in changing innovation trajectories. Moreover, our findings suggest that characteristics that inhibit incumbents' adaptation to technological change in general, such as commitments to old technology, also constrain their responsiveness to trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes. Thus, incumbents that experience the greatest inertia to adapt—and hence are most in need of external incentives—are also the least responsive to incentives, such that they are at risk of being caught in a double trap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 5","pages":"Article 105212"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policymakers increasingly implement trajectory-changing demand-pull policies that support the emergence of technologies outside old innovation trajectories. While previous studies provide important insights into how such demand-pull policies drive innovation, we lack a detailed understanding of the role of incumbents' heterogeneity. Understanding the determinants of incumbents' responses to trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes is valuable, as these firms might hinder but also enable sustainability transitions. We introduce the idea of demand-pull policy mixes and then investigate how incumbents' characteristics shape the impact of demand-pull policy mixes on incumbents' innovation activity. Building on the literature on incumbent adaptation, we find empirical evidence that incumbents' technological capabilities, firm performance, and commitment to old technology can inhibit the impact of trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes on their innovation activity. This highlights that policy impacts depend on incumbents' heterogeneity and, thus, on the incumbent firm population within a country. In addition, the effectiveness of trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes may be enhanced by the use of phase-out and technology-push policies. However, some policies that are considered destabilizing for old technologies may be less effective than assumed in changing innovation trajectories. Moreover, our findings suggest that characteristics that inhibit incumbents' adaptation to technological change in general, such as commitments to old technology, also constrain their responsiveness to trajectory-changing demand-pull policy mixes. Thus, incumbents that experience the greatest inertia to adapt—and hence are most in need of external incentives—are also the least responsive to incentives, such that they are at risk of being caught in a double trap.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信