Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Lia Gruber, Thomas Klatzer, Sonja Wogrin
{"title":"Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria","authors":"Lia Gruber,&nbsp;Thomas Klatzer,&nbsp;Sonja Wogrin","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For completing the energy transition, ordinary citizens have to be able to participate. This can be achieved with energy communities (ECs), which are getting implemented in EU member states. However, some of these legislations do not account for the possible challenges of implementing ECs. One example is Austrian law, which - in an attempt to take citizen involvement one step further - allows for simultaneous participation in multiple ECs. However, the law does not state how energy should be allocated among the members of these ECs, which opens the door to ambiguities that could lead to difficulties in energy allocation among ECs. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the study that closed this regulation gap by analyzing different methods of energy allocation in ECs with multiple participation. Four algorithms are developed and tested on solvability, complexity, comprehensibility, fairness and predictability. Only one algorithm has proven successful in all categories: the preference coefficient. Here, a preprocessing stage is included, in which each member must declare what percentage of consumption/generation goes to the multiple ECs in which they participate. Therefore, energy allocation in all ECs may be done in parallel without being dependent on the allocation results of other ECs. Based on the study presented this algorithm was implemented for the regulation of multiple participation in ECs in Austria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101672"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For completing the energy transition, ordinary citizens have to be able to participate. This can be achieved with energy communities (ECs), which are getting implemented in EU member states. However, some of these legislations do not account for the possible challenges of implementing ECs. One example is Austrian law, which - in an attempt to take citizen involvement one step further - allows for simultaneous participation in multiple ECs. However, the law does not state how energy should be allocated among the members of these ECs, which opens the door to ambiguities that could lead to difficulties in energy allocation among ECs. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the study that closed this regulation gap by analyzing different methods of energy allocation in ECs with multiple participation. Four algorithms are developed and tested on solvability, complexity, comprehensibility, fairness and predictability. Only one algorithm has proven successful in all categories: the preference coefficient. Here, a preprocessing stage is included, in which each member must declare what percentage of consumption/generation goes to the multiple ECs in which they participate. Therefore, energy allocation in all ECs may be done in parallel without being dependent on the allocation results of other ECs. Based on the study presented this algorithm was implemented for the regulation of multiple participation in ECs in Austria.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信