Elastic scattering spectroscopy for intraoperative oral cancer mucosal margin guidance: Initial results from a 104 patient cohort

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
G.P. Krisciunas , E. Rodriguez-Diaz , L. Berry , G. Spokas , O.M. A'Amar , M. Couey , H. Edwards , J. Gooey , J. Hanks , Z. Lu , D. Lucas , M. O'Leary , R. Pistey , M. Sakharkar , K. Sayre , J. Tracy , G. Zhao , I.J. Bigio , G.A. Grillone
{"title":"Elastic scattering spectroscopy for intraoperative oral cancer mucosal margin guidance: Initial results from a 104 patient cohort","authors":"G.P. Krisciunas ,&nbsp;E. Rodriguez-Diaz ,&nbsp;L. Berry ,&nbsp;G. Spokas ,&nbsp;O.M. A'Amar ,&nbsp;M. Couey ,&nbsp;H. Edwards ,&nbsp;J. Gooey ,&nbsp;J. Hanks ,&nbsp;Z. Lu ,&nbsp;D. Lucas ,&nbsp;M. O'Leary ,&nbsp;R. Pistey ,&nbsp;M. Sakharkar ,&nbsp;K. Sayre ,&nbsp;J. Tracy ,&nbsp;G. Zhao ,&nbsp;I.J. Bigio ,&nbsp;G.A. Grillone","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy (ESS) classification accuracy of benign vs malignant tissue obtained during intra-operative oral cancer resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study comprised 104 patients with a biopsy positive for oral cancer (<em>N</em> = 85) or dysplasia (<em>N</em> = 19) who were scheduled to undergo surgical excision. ESS measurements were obtained intraoperatively on and immediately adjacent to the lesion within the planned resection margin prior to excision, and on contralateral normal-site control tissue. Two-millimeter biopsies were obtained from tumor and margin tissue. All measurements were evaluated using Leave One Person Out (LOPO) AI-assisted statistical algorithms. Three analyses evaluated ESS diagnostic accuracy: one at the sample level, one at the pooled sample patient level, and one using only diagnostically variable biopsy co-registered margin samples. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Diagnostic accuracy at the sample level yielded sensitivity = 82 %, specificity = 84 %, and AUC = 0.91. Pooling samples within each patient yielded sensitivity = 94 %, specificity = 87 %, and AUC = 0.95. Sample level diagnostic accuracy at the margin yielded sensitivity = 76 %, specificity = 50 %, and AUC = 0.70, but prioritizing sensitivity, yielded a sensitivity = 90 %, specificity = 30 %, with AUC = 0.70.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ESS device demonstrated high sensitivity and appropriate specificity when differentiating benign from malignant tissue. Discriminant ability increased when samples were pooled within patients, informing future protocols for evaluating intraoperative ESS measures. These data are very promising and support the contention that ESS could be a valuable adjunct tool that facilitates comprehensive and efficient assessment of surgical margins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 3","pages":"Article 104605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy (ESS) classification accuracy of benign vs malignant tissue obtained during intra-operative oral cancer resection.

Methods

The study comprised 104 patients with a biopsy positive for oral cancer (N = 85) or dysplasia (N = 19) who were scheduled to undergo surgical excision. ESS measurements were obtained intraoperatively on and immediately adjacent to the lesion within the planned resection margin prior to excision, and on contralateral normal-site control tissue. Two-millimeter biopsies were obtained from tumor and margin tissue. All measurements were evaluated using Leave One Person Out (LOPO) AI-assisted statistical algorithms. Three analyses evaluated ESS diagnostic accuracy: one at the sample level, one at the pooled sample patient level, and one using only diagnostically variable biopsy co-registered margin samples. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC).

Results

Diagnostic accuracy at the sample level yielded sensitivity = 82 %, specificity = 84 %, and AUC = 0.91. Pooling samples within each patient yielded sensitivity = 94 %, specificity = 87 %, and AUC = 0.95. Sample level diagnostic accuracy at the margin yielded sensitivity = 76 %, specificity = 50 %, and AUC = 0.70, but prioritizing sensitivity, yielded a sensitivity = 90 %, specificity = 30 %, with AUC = 0.70.

Conclusion

The ESS device demonstrated high sensitivity and appropriate specificity when differentiating benign from malignant tissue. Discriminant ability increased when samples were pooled within patients, informing future protocols for evaluating intraoperative ESS measures. These data are very promising and support the contention that ESS could be a valuable adjunct tool that facilitates comprehensive and efficient assessment of surgical margins.
术中口腔癌粘膜缘弹性散射光谱学指导:104例患者队列的初步结果
目的评价术中口腔癌切除术中弹性散射光谱(ESS)对良、恶性组织分类的准确性。方法本研究纳入104例口腔癌活检阳性(85例)或不典型增生(19例)患者,这些患者计划接受手术切除。术中在切除前计划切除边缘内的病变上和邻近部位以及对侧正常部位对照组织上进行ESS测量。从肿瘤和边缘组织进行2毫米活检。所有测量结果均采用人工智能辅助统计算法(LOPO)评估。三个分析评估了ESS诊断的准确性:一个在样本水平,一个在合并样本患者水平,一个只使用诊断变量活检共登记的边缘样本。统计分析包括敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)。结果样品水平诊断的灵敏度为82%,特异度为84%,AUC = 0.91。在每位患者中汇集样本,得出敏感性= 94%,特异性= 87%,AUC = 0.95。样本水平的边缘诊断准确率灵敏度为76%,特异度为50%,AUC = 0.70,但优先级灵敏度为90%,特异度为30%,AUC = 0.70。结论ESS鉴别良恶性组织具有较高的敏感性和特异性。当在患者中汇集样本时,判别能力增强,为评估术中ESS措施的未来方案提供了信息。这些数据是非常有希望的,并且支持ESS可以作为一种有价值的辅助工具,促进全面有效的手术切缘评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信