Second booster doses of adenoviral- and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines increase protection against COVID-19 hospitalization: Final analysis from the REFORCO-Brazil real-world effectiveness study during Omicron

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Wilhelmine Meeraus , Abigail Postema , Christen M. Gray , Andrew Lee , Andre Santa Maria , Bárbara Emoingt Furtado , Eduardo Conde-Sousa , Mario Ouwens , Douglas Andreas Valverde , Clóvis Arns da Cunha , Alexandre Naime Barbosa , Claudia Corte , Sylvia Taylor
{"title":"Second booster doses of adenoviral- and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines increase protection against COVID-19 hospitalization: Final analysis from the REFORCO-Brazil real-world effectiveness study during Omicron","authors":"Wilhelmine Meeraus ,&nbsp;Abigail Postema ,&nbsp;Christen M. Gray ,&nbsp;Andrew Lee ,&nbsp;Andre Santa Maria ,&nbsp;Bárbara Emoingt Furtado ,&nbsp;Eduardo Conde-Sousa ,&nbsp;Mario Ouwens ,&nbsp;Douglas Andreas Valverde ,&nbsp;Clóvis Arns da Cunha ,&nbsp;Alexandre Naime Barbosa ,&nbsp;Claudia Corte ,&nbsp;Sylvia Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines are required to maintain protection against SARS-CoV-2. However, real-world evidence from South America, needed to inform optimal vaccination strategies, is lacking. Herein, we present the final analysis of REFORCO-Brazil, a large-scale assessment of relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of second boosters (vs first boosters) against hospitalization with COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>REFORCO-Brazil is a test-negative case-control study (<span><span>NCT05697705</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) that utilized Brazilian national data on severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) surveillance and COVID-19 vaccination. Individuals hospitalized with SARS from January 1 to December 31, 2022, were classified as test-positive cases (via SARS-CoV-2 antigen/reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]) or test-negative case-controls (via RT-PCR) and matched by admission date, region, sex, preceding COVID-19 vaccinations, and age. We used conditional logistic regression combined with multiple covariate adjustments to estimate rVE for second boosters (versus first boosters received ≥4 months prior) overall, by type (AZD1222, Ad26.COV2·S, BNT162b2, and CoronaVac) and in vulnerable subgroups (elderly and immunocompromised/high-risk individuals).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median (range) time between second booster and SARS hospitalization was 87.0 (8.0–307.0) and 79.0 (8.0–303.0) days among 5426 test-positive cases and 6131 test-negative controls, respectively. Overall rVE of any second booster against hospitalization was 18.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 10.5–26.1). The rVE of adenoviral- and mRNA-based vaccines was similar; 18.2 % (4.8–29.8) for AZD1222, 20.7 % (10.2–30.0) for Ad26.COV2·S, and 23.2 % (9.7–34.7) for BNT162b2. Similar levels of added protective benefit, or ‘boosting’, was observed in very elderly and immunocompromised/high-risk individuals. Additional protection was highest within 2 months post-dosing, decreasing thereafter. Exploratory analyses revealed increased protection against severe in-hospital outcomes, including mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results support the use of monovalent adenoviral/mRNA-based vaccine maintain protection against COVID-19 hospitalization from Omicron subvariants. However, optimal timing of booster vaccinations will need to be carefully considered for future booster strategies, especially among vulnerable subgroups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 126955"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2500252X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines are required to maintain protection against SARS-CoV-2. However, real-world evidence from South America, needed to inform optimal vaccination strategies, is lacking. Herein, we present the final analysis of REFORCO-Brazil, a large-scale assessment of relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of second boosters (vs first boosters) against hospitalization with COVID-19.

Methods

REFORCO-Brazil is a test-negative case-control study (NCT05697705) that utilized Brazilian national data on severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) surveillance and COVID-19 vaccination. Individuals hospitalized with SARS from January 1 to December 31, 2022, were classified as test-positive cases (via SARS-CoV-2 antigen/reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]) or test-negative case-controls (via RT-PCR) and matched by admission date, region, sex, preceding COVID-19 vaccinations, and age. We used conditional logistic regression combined with multiple covariate adjustments to estimate rVE for second boosters (versus first boosters received ≥4 months prior) overall, by type (AZD1222, Ad26.COV2·S, BNT162b2, and CoronaVac) and in vulnerable subgroups (elderly and immunocompromised/high-risk individuals).

Results

Median (range) time between second booster and SARS hospitalization was 87.0 (8.0–307.0) and 79.0 (8.0–303.0) days among 5426 test-positive cases and 6131 test-negative controls, respectively. Overall rVE of any second booster against hospitalization was 18.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 10.5–26.1). The rVE of adenoviral- and mRNA-based vaccines was similar; 18.2 % (4.8–29.8) for AZD1222, 20.7 % (10.2–30.0) for Ad26.COV2·S, and 23.2 % (9.7–34.7) for BNT162b2. Similar levels of added protective benefit, or ‘boosting’, was observed in very elderly and immunocompromised/high-risk individuals. Additional protection was highest within 2 months post-dosing, decreasing thereafter. Exploratory analyses revealed increased protection against severe in-hospital outcomes, including mortality.

Conclusions

Our results support the use of monovalent adenoviral/mRNA-based vaccine maintain protection against COVID-19 hospitalization from Omicron subvariants. However, optimal timing of booster vaccinations will need to be carefully considered for future booster strategies, especially among vulnerable subgroups.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信