What propels the transition? Understanding push-pull-mooring influences on switching from improper E-waste handling to formal recycling

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Muhammed Sajid , Myriam Ertz
{"title":"What propels the transition? Understanding push-pull-mooring influences on switching from improper E-waste handling to formal recycling","authors":"Muhammed Sajid ,&nbsp;Myriam Ertz","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the factors influencing consumers' intentions to switch from improper handling to e-waste recycling. Utilizing the theoretical framework of Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) theory, this research adopts a mixed-methods design. Initially, a qualitative study identifies the push, pull, and mooring factors affecting consumers' switching intentions. Subsequently, the second phase of the research develops and quantitatively tests a framework based on these findings using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that perceived environmental risk and climate change-related health risk perception are push factors in this context. Additionally, government initiatives are identified as pull factors, while perceived convenience is a mooring factor. This research significantly enriches the literature on e-waste recycling and offers practical insights for enhancing e-waste recycling initiatives in developing countries. The study’s comprehensive approach provides a robust basis for understanding and promoting better e-waste management practices in similar contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784325000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing consumers' intentions to switch from improper handling to e-waste recycling. Utilizing the theoretical framework of Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) theory, this research adopts a mixed-methods design. Initially, a qualitative study identifies the push, pull, and mooring factors affecting consumers' switching intentions. Subsequently, the second phase of the research develops and quantitatively tests a framework based on these findings using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that perceived environmental risk and climate change-related health risk perception are push factors in this context. Additionally, government initiatives are identified as pull factors, while perceived convenience is a mooring factor. This research significantly enriches the literature on e-waste recycling and offers practical insights for enhancing e-waste recycling initiatives in developing countries. The study’s comprehensive approach provides a robust basis for understanding and promoting better e-waste management practices in similar contexts.
是什么推动了这种转变?了解推拉系泊对从不当电子废物处理转向正式回收的影响
本研究旨在探讨影响消费者从不当处理转向电子垃圾回收的因素。利用推拉系泊(PPM)理论框架,采用混合方法设计。首先,定性研究确定了影响消费者转换意图的推、拉和系泊因素。随后,研究的第二阶段使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)开发并定量测试了基于这些发现的框架。结果表明,环境风险感知和气候变化相关健康风险感知是这一背景下的推动因素。此外,政府举措被认为是拉动因素,而感知到的便利性是一个系泊因素。本研究显著丰富了电子垃圾回收的文献,并为加强发展中国家的电子垃圾回收倡议提供了实践见解。该研究的综合方法为在类似情况下理解和促进更好的电子废物管理实践提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信