Three sample-sparing techniques to estimate the molar absorption coefficient of luminescent dyes

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jeffrey M. Schaub, Quinn A. Best, Cheng Zhao, Richard A. Haack, Qiaoqiao Ruan
{"title":"Three sample-sparing techniques to estimate the molar absorption coefficient of luminescent dyes","authors":"Jeffrey M. Schaub,&nbsp;Quinn A. Best,&nbsp;Cheng Zhao,&nbsp;Richard A. Haack,&nbsp;Qiaoqiao Ruan","doi":"10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.101971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Luminescent dyes are commonly modified to improve their solubility, permeability, or spectral properties. However, changing the chemical structure influences the absorption of light and thus the compound-specific molar absorption coefficient (<em>ε</em>), which also confounds the compound's concentration in solution. The accurate determination of the molar absorption coefficient of new luminescent molecules is labor intensive and challenging when a limited amount of material is available for testing. To address this problem, we developed three techniques combined with UV–Vis spectrophotometry to closely approximate the molar absorption coefficient of various light-emitting dyes. The first technique uses Electrospray Mass Spectrometry to obtain a high-resolution incorporation ratio of a dye-labeled protein. The second approach utilizes covalent linking of the unknown dye to a dye with a known absorption coefficient. In the third method, we used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to determine the fluorophore concentration in solution. We test each method with well-characterized fluorescent dyes and an uncharacterized chemilumiphore. Each technique produced calculated absorption coefficients comparable to the published reference values, although each presented unique limitations that reduced accuracy under certain conditions. Nevertheless, the techniques could be incorporated into current compound evaluation workflows and require only a small amount of sample, two significant advantages over traditional methods for characterizing new luminescent compounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8771,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405580825000585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Luminescent dyes are commonly modified to improve their solubility, permeability, or spectral properties. However, changing the chemical structure influences the absorption of light and thus the compound-specific molar absorption coefficient (ε), which also confounds the compound's concentration in solution. The accurate determination of the molar absorption coefficient of new luminescent molecules is labor intensive and challenging when a limited amount of material is available for testing. To address this problem, we developed three techniques combined with UV–Vis spectrophotometry to closely approximate the molar absorption coefficient of various light-emitting dyes. The first technique uses Electrospray Mass Spectrometry to obtain a high-resolution incorporation ratio of a dye-labeled protein. The second approach utilizes covalent linking of the unknown dye to a dye with a known absorption coefficient. In the third method, we used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to determine the fluorophore concentration in solution. We test each method with well-characterized fluorescent dyes and an uncharacterized chemilumiphore. Each technique produced calculated absorption coefficients comparable to the published reference values, although each presented unique limitations that reduced accuracy under certain conditions. Nevertheless, the techniques could be incorporated into current compound evaluation workflows and require only a small amount of sample, two significant advantages over traditional methods for characterizing new luminescent compounds.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biophysics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Open access, online only, peer-reviewed international journal in the Life Sciences, established in 2014 Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports (BB Reports) publishes original research in all aspects of Biochemistry, Biophysics and related areas like Molecular and Cell Biology. BB Reports welcomes solid though more preliminary, descriptive and small scale results if they have the potential to stimulate and/or contribute to future research, leading to new insights or hypothesis. Primary criteria for acceptance is that the work is original, scientifically and technically sound and provides valuable knowledge to life sciences research. We strongly believe all results deserve to be published and documented for the advancement of science. BB Reports specifically appreciates receiving reports on: Negative results, Replication studies, Reanalysis of previous datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信