Harnessing machine learning for predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation: A systematic review

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Fatma Refaat Ahmed PhD, RN , Nabeel Al-Yateem PhD, RN , Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi MD, MPH , Ahmad Rajeh Saifan PhD, RN, CNS , Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem PhD, RN, FHEA , Mohannad Eid AbuRuz PhD, RN
{"title":"Harnessing machine learning for predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation: A systematic review","authors":"Fatma Refaat Ahmed PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Nabeel Al-Yateem PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ahmad Rajeh Saifan PhD, RN, CNS ,&nbsp;Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem PhD, RN, FHEA ,&nbsp;Mohannad Eid AbuRuz PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Machine learning (ML) models represent advanced computational approaches with increasing application in predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV). Whilst ML itself has a long history, its application to MV weaning outcomes has emerged more recently. In this systematic review, we assessed the effects of ML on the prediction of successful weaning outcomes amongst adult patients undergoing MV.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched up to May 2024. In addition, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore databases were searched. We included peer-reviewed studies examining ML models for the prediction of successful MV in adult patients. We used a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for quality assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven studies (n = 18 336) were included. Boosting algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine, were amongst the most frequently used methods, followed by random forest, multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and convolutional neural networks, a deep learning model. The most common cross-validation methods included five-fold and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance varied, with the artificial neural network accuracy ranging from 77% to 80%, multilayer perceptron achieving 87% accuracy and 94% precision, and convolutional neural network showing areas under the curve of 91% and 94%. XGBoost generally outperformed other models in the area under the curve comparisons. Quality assessment indicated that almost all studies had high quality as seven out of 10 studies had full scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ML models effectively predicted weaning outcomes in adult patients undergoing MV, with XGBoost outperforming other models. However, the absence of studies utilising newer architectures, such as transformer models, highlights an opportunity for further exploration and refinement in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731425000335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Machine learning (ML) models represent advanced computational approaches with increasing application in predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV). Whilst ML itself has a long history, its application to MV weaning outcomes has emerged more recently. In this systematic review, we assessed the effects of ML on the prediction of successful weaning outcomes amongst adult patients undergoing MV.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched up to May 2024. In addition, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore databases were searched. We included peer-reviewed studies examining ML models for the prediction of successful MV in adult patients. We used a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for quality assessment.

Results

Eleven studies (n = 18 336) were included. Boosting algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine, were amongst the most frequently used methods, followed by random forest, multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and convolutional neural networks, a deep learning model. The most common cross-validation methods included five-fold and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance varied, with the artificial neural network accuracy ranging from 77% to 80%, multilayer perceptron achieving 87% accuracy and 94% precision, and convolutional neural network showing areas under the curve of 91% and 94%. XGBoost generally outperformed other models in the area under the curve comparisons. Quality assessment indicated that almost all studies had high quality as seven out of 10 studies had full scores.

Conclusions

ML models effectively predicted weaning outcomes in adult patients undergoing MV, with XGBoost outperforming other models. However, the absence of studies utilising newer architectures, such as transformer models, highlights an opportunity for further exploration and refinement in this field.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信