A less invasive catheterization protocol for managing urinary retention in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Keetie Kremers-van de Hei , Bob Evers , Lotte Weijers , Diederick Duijvesz , Berend Willem Schreurs , Sander Koeter
{"title":"A less invasive catheterization protocol for managing urinary retention in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Keetie Kremers-van de Hei ,&nbsp;Bob Evers ,&nbsp;Lotte Weijers ,&nbsp;Diederick Duijvesz ,&nbsp;Berend Willem Schreurs ,&nbsp;Sander Koeter","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2025.101172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently seen serious complication after surgery. After orthopaedic hip or knee arthroplasty the incidence is relatively high, between 30 and 50% in previous studies. Currently, there is no consensus on the indication for urinary catheterization and a uniform guideline is lacking. This prospective cohort study examined the safety of a modified catheterization protocol with a catheterization threshold of 800 ml instead of 400 ml (usual care) after elective joint arthroplasty using ultrasound bladder scans. The hypothesis was that the incidence of catheterization will be reduced without increasing urinary complications.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We prospectively included 305 patients who were treated according to the local fast track arthroplasty protocol in which a modified catheterization protocol was used. Catheterization was only performed at a scan volume of 800 ml or more. Bladder contents were monitored preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and at outpatient follow-up. Urological scores and complications were monitored. The usual care control group was treated according to the usual care protocol with a threshold for catheterization of 400 ml, these results were published in a previous study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of catheterization for urinary retention was significantly lower in patients who were treated with the less invasive protocol than the usual care control group (11.1% versus 48.8%, p &lt; 0.001). The rate of urologic complications was low using the new protocol (4% urinary tract infection and 0.3% pharmacological interventions).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of our study provide strong empirical support for modifying catheterization protocols after orthopaedic surgery. A less invasive protocol is safe, provides reduction in workload for nurses, is patient-friendly and reduces costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124125000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently seen serious complication after surgery. After orthopaedic hip or knee arthroplasty the incidence is relatively high, between 30 and 50% in previous studies. Currently, there is no consensus on the indication for urinary catheterization and a uniform guideline is lacking. This prospective cohort study examined the safety of a modified catheterization protocol with a catheterization threshold of 800 ml instead of 400 ml (usual care) after elective joint arthroplasty using ultrasound bladder scans. The hypothesis was that the incidence of catheterization will be reduced without increasing urinary complications.

Method

We prospectively included 305 patients who were treated according to the local fast track arthroplasty protocol in which a modified catheterization protocol was used. Catheterization was only performed at a scan volume of 800 ml or more. Bladder contents were monitored preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and at outpatient follow-up. Urological scores and complications were monitored. The usual care control group was treated according to the usual care protocol with a threshold for catheterization of 400 ml, these results were published in a previous study.

Results

The incidence of catheterization for urinary retention was significantly lower in patients who were treated with the less invasive protocol than the usual care control group (11.1% versus 48.8%, p < 0.001). The rate of urologic complications was low using the new protocol (4% urinary tract infection and 0.3% pharmacological interventions).

Conclusion

The results of our study provide strong empirical support for modifying catheterization protocols after orthopaedic surgery. A less invasive protocol is safe, provides reduction in workload for nurses, is patient-friendly and reduces costs.
一种微创导尿管治疗髋关节和膝关节置换术患者尿潴留的方案:一项前瞻性队列研究
背景术后尿潴留是术后常见的严重并发症。在骨科髋关节或膝关节置换术后,发病率相对较高,在先前的研究中为30 - 50%。目前,关于导尿的指征没有共识,缺乏统一的指南。这项前瞻性队列研究检查了选择性关节置换术后使用超声膀胱扫描将置管阈值改为800ml而不是400ml(常规护理)的改进置管方案的安全性。假设导尿的发生率会降低,而不会增加泌尿系统并发症。方法前瞻性纳入305例采用局部快速通道关节置换术的患者,其中采用改良的置管方案。仅在扫描容积为800毫升或更多时进行导管插入。术前、术后及门诊随访监测膀胱内容物。监测泌尿系统评分和并发症。常规护理对照组按常规护理方案治疗,置管阈值为400ml,这些结果已在既往研究中发表。结果微创治疗组尿潴留导尿发生率明显低于常规治疗组(11.1% vs 48.8%, p <;0.001)。使用新方案的泌尿系统并发症发生率较低(4%尿路感染和0.3%药物干预)。结论本研究结果为骨科术后置管方案的修改提供了有力的实证支持。侵入性较小的方案是安全的,减少了护士的工作量,对患者友好,并降低了成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信