{"title":"Ice thickness inversion assessment: A comparison study for Waldemarbreen and Irenebreen glaciers, Svalbard","authors":"Lelde Švinka, Jānis Karušs, Kristaps Lamsters","doi":"10.1016/j.polar.2025.101167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate ice thickness estimates are crucial for solving both glaciological and hydrological problems, and ice thickness inversion models are generally used to obtain these estimates. Several studies have assessed the accuracy of model inversions, however, usually the evaluation is done against a sparse set of field measurements. In this study, we employ the open-source models GlabTop2 and Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) to estimate ice thickness and volume for the Waldemarbreen and Irenebreen glaciers (Svalbard archipelago), evaluating their accuracy against ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurements. The results show that the ice thickness root-mean-square errors for GlabTop2 and OGGM are 28.5 and 13.9 m and the relative volume errors are 17.4 and 39.9%, respectively. Calibration of glacier shape factor slightly improves GlabTop2 results, however, this model tends to provide good average estimates but falls short on accurate spatial thickness distribution. On the contrary, the OGGM model is highly dependent on the chosen dataset for mass balance calibration and tends to provide better spatial distribution while performing worse regarding average thickness and overall glacier volume. Both inversion models present severe thickness errors among studied glaciers, implying the need for improvements in models and underlying theoretical assumptions that require continuous and extensive field measurements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20316,"journal":{"name":"Polar Science","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873965225000040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate ice thickness estimates are crucial for solving both glaciological and hydrological problems, and ice thickness inversion models are generally used to obtain these estimates. Several studies have assessed the accuracy of model inversions, however, usually the evaluation is done against a sparse set of field measurements. In this study, we employ the open-source models GlabTop2 and Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) to estimate ice thickness and volume for the Waldemarbreen and Irenebreen glaciers (Svalbard archipelago), evaluating their accuracy against ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurements. The results show that the ice thickness root-mean-square errors for GlabTop2 and OGGM are 28.5 and 13.9 m and the relative volume errors are 17.4 and 39.9%, respectively. Calibration of glacier shape factor slightly improves GlabTop2 results, however, this model tends to provide good average estimates but falls short on accurate spatial thickness distribution. On the contrary, the OGGM model is highly dependent on the chosen dataset for mass balance calibration and tends to provide better spatial distribution while performing worse regarding average thickness and overall glacier volume. Both inversion models present severe thickness errors among studied glaciers, implying the need for improvements in models and underlying theoretical assumptions that require continuous and extensive field measurements.
期刊介绍:
Polar Science is an international, peer-reviewed quarterly journal. It is dedicated to publishing original research articles for sciences relating to the polar regions of the Earth and other planets. Polar Science aims to cover 15 disciplines which are listed below; they cover most aspects of physical sciences, geosciences and life sciences, together with engineering and social sciences. Articles should attract the interest of broad polar science communities, and not be limited to the interests of those who work under specific research subjects. Polar Science also has an Open Archive whereby published articles are made freely available from ScienceDirect after an embargo period of 24 months from the date of publication.
- Space and upper atmosphere physics
- Atmospheric science/climatology
- Glaciology
- Oceanography/sea ice studies
- Geology/petrology
- Solid earth geophysics/seismology
- Marine Earth science
- Geomorphology/Cenozoic-Quaternary geology
- Meteoritics
- Terrestrial biology
- Marine biology
- Animal ecology
- Environment
- Polar Engineering
- Humanities and social sciences.