Bridging the EPC and IPAT in the presence of natural resources in China: Considering asymmetries in environmental-related technologies and unemployment
{"title":"Bridging the EPC and IPAT in the presence of natural resources in China: Considering asymmetries in environmental-related technologies and unemployment","authors":"Zia Ur Rahman , Shakil Ahmad , Abbas Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In modern times, one of the most significant difficulties many nations confront is fostering economic development and employment while maintaining environmental sustainability. To accomplish this, this research seeks to empirically analyze the impact of unemployment (UE), innovation in environmental technology (IiT), GDP per capita, and energy consumption per capita on carbon emissions (CO2e) per capita among China's top emitters. A new Environmental PhilipshCurve (EPC) framework is used to adjust for other relevant factors, such as natural resource rent (NR), using data ranging from 1990 to 2020. This is the first research investigating the asymmetric effect (increase/decrease) in UE and IiT. Long-run empirical findings of non-linear N-ARDL show that energy and NR are substantial positive contributors to CO2e. Furthermore, negative shocks (reduction) in UE increase CO2e, while positive shocks (increase) in IiT significantly reduce CO2e. The results were further tested using fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares techniques to ensure robustness. These empirical findings imply that lowering UE levels via adequate climate change mitigation technology adaption would enhance environmental quality. To combat environmental degradation and unemployment (UE), authorities must emphasize programs connected to innovation in environmental technology and renewable energy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 105523"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000650","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In modern times, one of the most significant difficulties many nations confront is fostering economic development and employment while maintaining environmental sustainability. To accomplish this, this research seeks to empirically analyze the impact of unemployment (UE), innovation in environmental technology (IiT), GDP per capita, and energy consumption per capita on carbon emissions (CO2e) per capita among China's top emitters. A new Environmental PhilipshCurve (EPC) framework is used to adjust for other relevant factors, such as natural resource rent (NR), using data ranging from 1990 to 2020. This is the first research investigating the asymmetric effect (increase/decrease) in UE and IiT. Long-run empirical findings of non-linear N-ARDL show that energy and NR are substantial positive contributors to CO2e. Furthermore, negative shocks (reduction) in UE increase CO2e, while positive shocks (increase) in IiT significantly reduce CO2e. The results were further tested using fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares techniques to ensure robustness. These empirical findings imply that lowering UE levels via adequate climate change mitigation technology adaption would enhance environmental quality. To combat environmental degradation and unemployment (UE), authorities must emphasize programs connected to innovation in environmental technology and renewable energy development.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.