Application of adsorption and ozonation as quaternary treatment of WWTP effluent for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern: Results from laboratory scale experiments

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Agostina Chiavola , Camilla Di Marcantonio , Andrea Noè Porretti , Sara Scagnetti , Veronica Ciuchi , Maria Rosaria Boni , Sacha Micoli , Marco Lazzazzara , Simone Leoni , Alessandro Frugis , Valentina Gioia
{"title":"Application of adsorption and ozonation as quaternary treatment of WWTP effluent for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern: Results from laboratory scale experiments","authors":"Agostina Chiavola ,&nbsp;Camilla Di Marcantonio ,&nbsp;Andrea Noè Porretti ,&nbsp;Sara Scagnetti ,&nbsp;Veronica Ciuchi ,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Boni ,&nbsp;Sacha Micoli ,&nbsp;Marco Lazzazzara ,&nbsp;Simone Leoni ,&nbsp;Alessandro Frugis ,&nbsp;Valentina Gioia","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>European legislation introduces the need for quaternary treatment processes to reduce the risk associated with residual concentrations of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) present in the final effluent of Wastewater Treatment Plants. Among the various processes evaluated for this purpose, adsorption and ozonation have demonstrated the highest removal efficiencies. This study investigated the efficiency of these processes at laboratory scale, targeting four representative CECs commonly detected in wastewater: Carbamazepine (CBZ, antiepileptic), Sulfamethoxazole (SMX, antibiotic), 1H-Benzotriazole (BTR) and 5-Methyl-1H-Benzotriazole (MBTR) (corrosion inhibitors). Experiments were conducted under different operating conditions and treatment configurations. Overall, ozonation efficiently removed all the target CECs. CBZ and SMX exhibited similar reduction trends, achieving 90% removal within the first 5 min of treatment and complete removal after 15 min, at typical ozone dosages. MBTR was also effectively degraded but at a slower rate: the complete removal was observed only after 30 min. BTR required 60 min to reach a 50% concentration reduction. The removal patterns of these CECs in the mixture closely resembled those observed in the tests where they were present alone; only MBTR degradation rate decreased appreciably. Adsorption experiments, both in batch and continuous flow applications, revealed an inverse removal affinity: BTR&gt;MBTR&gt;&gt;CBZ&gt;SMX. The Freundlich isotherm model always provided the best fitting of the batch experimental data. The Freundlich constant, K<sub>F</sub>, for benzotriazole compounds was significantly higher than for pharmaceuticals: 74.13 for BTR, 97.09 for MBTR, 18.90 for CBZ and 18.65 for SMX.</div><div>This study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of ozonation and adsorption for CECs removal, offering critical data to support decision-making in the upgrading of wastewater treatment plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100665"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European legislation introduces the need for quaternary treatment processes to reduce the risk associated with residual concentrations of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) present in the final effluent of Wastewater Treatment Plants. Among the various processes evaluated for this purpose, adsorption and ozonation have demonstrated the highest removal efficiencies. This study investigated the efficiency of these processes at laboratory scale, targeting four representative CECs commonly detected in wastewater: Carbamazepine (CBZ, antiepileptic), Sulfamethoxazole (SMX, antibiotic), 1H-Benzotriazole (BTR) and 5-Methyl-1H-Benzotriazole (MBTR) (corrosion inhibitors). Experiments were conducted under different operating conditions and treatment configurations. Overall, ozonation efficiently removed all the target CECs. CBZ and SMX exhibited similar reduction trends, achieving 90% removal within the first 5 min of treatment and complete removal after 15 min, at typical ozone dosages. MBTR was also effectively degraded but at a slower rate: the complete removal was observed only after 30 min. BTR required 60 min to reach a 50% concentration reduction. The removal patterns of these CECs in the mixture closely resembled those observed in the tests where they were present alone; only MBTR degradation rate decreased appreciably. Adsorption experiments, both in batch and continuous flow applications, revealed an inverse removal affinity: BTR>MBTR>>CBZ>SMX. The Freundlich isotherm model always provided the best fitting of the batch experimental data. The Freundlich constant, KF, for benzotriazole compounds was significantly higher than for pharmaceuticals: 74.13 for BTR, 97.09 for MBTR, 18.90 for CBZ and 18.65 for SMX.
This study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of ozonation and adsorption for CECs removal, offering critical data to support decision-making in the upgrading of wastewater treatment plants.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信