Improving out-of-population prediction: The complementary effects of model assistance and judgmental bootstrapping

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mathew D. Hardy , Sam Zhang , Jessica Hullman , Jake M. Hofman , Daniel G. Goldstein
{"title":"Improving out-of-population prediction: The complementary effects of model assistance and judgmental bootstrapping","authors":"Mathew D. Hardy ,&nbsp;Sam Zhang ,&nbsp;Jessica Hullman ,&nbsp;Jake M. Hofman ,&nbsp;Daniel G. Goldstein","doi":"10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose and test a method for out-of-population prediction termed model-assisted judgmental bootstrapping, which leverages a predictive model from one domain combined with expert judgment to generate training data and subsequently a predictive model for a new domain. In a preregistered experiment (<span><math><mi>N</mi></math></span>=1440), we assessed the predictive accuracy of this method in increasingly challenging environments. We also analyzed the individual contributions of two techniques that underlie the method: model-assisted estimation and judgmental bootstrapping. Our findings revealed that both techniques significantly improved predictive accuracy. Furthermore, their impacts were complementary: model-assisted estimation provided the largest accuracy gains in the least demanding environment, while judgmental bootstrapping did so in the most challenging environment. Our results suggest that model-assisted judgmental bootstrapping is a promising technique for creating predictive models in domains in which outcome data are not available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14061,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forecasting","volume":"41 2","pages":"Pages 689-701"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207024000694","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose and test a method for out-of-population prediction termed model-assisted judgmental bootstrapping, which leverages a predictive model from one domain combined with expert judgment to generate training data and subsequently a predictive model for a new domain. In a preregistered experiment (N=1440), we assessed the predictive accuracy of this method in increasingly challenging environments. We also analyzed the individual contributions of two techniques that underlie the method: model-assisted estimation and judgmental bootstrapping. Our findings revealed that both techniques significantly improved predictive accuracy. Furthermore, their impacts were complementary: model-assisted estimation provided the largest accuracy gains in the least demanding environment, while judgmental bootstrapping did so in the most challenging environment. Our results suggest that model-assisted judgmental bootstrapping is a promising technique for creating predictive models in domains in which outcome data are not available.
改进人口外预测:模型辅助和判断自举的互补效应
我们提出并测试了一种称为模型辅助判断引导的人口外预测方法,该方法利用一个领域的预测模型与专家判断相结合来生成训练数据,然后生成新领域的预测模型。在一项预注册实验(N=1440)中,我们评估了该方法在日益具有挑战性的环境中的预测准确性。我们还分析了作为该方法基础的两种技术的各自贡献:模型辅助估计和判断自举。我们的研究结果表明,这两种技术都显著提高了预测的准确性。此外,它们的影响是互补的:模型辅助估计在要求最低的环境中提供了最大的精度增益,而判断引导在最具挑战性的环境中也这样做。我们的研究结果表明,模型辅助判断引导是一种很有前途的技术,可以在没有结果数据的领域中创建预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
189
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Forecasting is a leading journal in its field that publishes high quality refereed papers. It aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice, making forecasting useful and relevant for decision and policy makers. The journal places strong emphasis on empirical studies, evaluation activities, implementation research, and improving the practice of forecasting. It welcomes various points of view and encourages debate to find solutions to field-related problems. The journal is the official publication of the International Institute of Forecasters (IIF) and is indexed in Sociological Abstracts, Journal of Economic Literature, Statistical Theory and Method Abstracts, INSPEC, Current Contents, UMI Data Courier, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, CIS, IAOR, and Social Sciences Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信