{"title":"Assessment of the adoption of nature-based solutions for flood risk mitigation: Socio-economic determinants in the River Nyamwamba catchment, Uganda","authors":"Nelson Nuwahereza , Susan Balaba Tumwebaze","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Floods are the most common and destructive natural disaster being experienced worldwide. This necessitates effective flood risk reduction measures and Nature Based Solutions (NBS) have emerged as promising measures that not only reduce the flood risk but also offer additional environmental and societal benefits. This study aimed to establish the household socio-economic characteristics that determine adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction in the rural mountainous River Nyamwamba catchment, Southwestern Uganda. The study answered the following research questions, (a) to what extent have NBS for flood risk reduction been adopted in River Nyamwamba catchment, (b) How does the stage at which a household becomes involved in a NBS project influence its likelihood of adopting NBS for flood risk reduction? (c) What household socio-economic characteristics significantly affect adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction? The study revealed moderate adoption of NBS for floodrisk reduction, with 54% of households in the catchment having adopted at least one or a combination of river buffer zone restoration and/ or on-farm tree planting. Findings revealed that access to flood risk information, past flood experience, and the number of contributors to household livelihood (number of breadwinners) are the household socio-economic characteristics that significantly affect the adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction. The study also revealed that the stage at which a household becomes involved in a NBS project has no significant impact on the likelihood of adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction. The study recommends improving access to flood risk information, leveraging past flood experiences, and addressing intra-household land use conflicts to enhance adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction. Moreover, the study highlights the need for participatory approaches and sustained community engagement to ensure that NBS interventions are locally acceptable</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241152500014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Floods are the most common and destructive natural disaster being experienced worldwide. This necessitates effective flood risk reduction measures and Nature Based Solutions (NBS) have emerged as promising measures that not only reduce the flood risk but also offer additional environmental and societal benefits. This study aimed to establish the household socio-economic characteristics that determine adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction in the rural mountainous River Nyamwamba catchment, Southwestern Uganda. The study answered the following research questions, (a) to what extent have NBS for flood risk reduction been adopted in River Nyamwamba catchment, (b) How does the stage at which a household becomes involved in a NBS project influence its likelihood of adopting NBS for flood risk reduction? (c) What household socio-economic characteristics significantly affect adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction? The study revealed moderate adoption of NBS for floodrisk reduction, with 54% of households in the catchment having adopted at least one or a combination of river buffer zone restoration and/ or on-farm tree planting. Findings revealed that access to flood risk information, past flood experience, and the number of contributors to household livelihood (number of breadwinners) are the household socio-economic characteristics that significantly affect the adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction. The study also revealed that the stage at which a household becomes involved in a NBS project has no significant impact on the likelihood of adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction. The study recommends improving access to flood risk information, leveraging past flood experiences, and addressing intra-household land use conflicts to enhance adoption of NBS for flood risk reduction. Moreover, the study highlights the need for participatory approaches and sustained community engagement to ensure that NBS interventions are locally acceptable