A multi-model approach to estimate excess mortality in the Nordics, 2020–2023

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sasikiran Kandula , Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen , Gunnar Rø , Marissa LeBlanc , Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
{"title":"A multi-model approach to estimate excess mortality in the Nordics, 2020–2023","authors":"Sasikiran Kandula ,&nbsp;Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen ,&nbsp;Gunnar Rø ,&nbsp;Marissa LeBlanc ,&nbsp;Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Excess mortality has been one of the commonly used measures of the population health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden share several health and socioeconomic characteristics but adopted different control measures and experienced varying degrees of case and hospitalization burden during the pandemic. Using mortality trends between 2001 and 2019 and a combination of models, we estimated and compared annual and monthly excess mortality in these countries nationally as well as stratified by age, sex and subnational regions between 2020 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Multi-model study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three methods were used to estimate mortality: i) a Bayesian spatial model with a random effect component for spatial dependence among subregions and trend and seasonality terms; ii) a Bayesian GAMM model with terms for annual trend (a thin-plate spline) and within-year seasonality (a cyclic cubic spline); and, iii) a combination of autoregressive and exponential trend smoothing methods. Estimates from these approaches were combined using model averaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on age-standardized mortality rates (per 100,000 population) of the averaged estimates: Finland had the highest cumulative excess mortality of the four countries; older age groups (70+ year) accounted for nearly all excess mortality; men had higher excess rates than women; and capital regions had some of the lowest rates relative to other regions in each country. With a few exceptions, mortality in 2023 returned to pre-pandemic levels. Model verification indicated good calibration and superior skill of the combination model relative to its component models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We believe our approach better quantifies uncertainty than individual models, and our estimates are comprehensive, spatially, temporally and demographically well-resolved, and can support further association studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625001052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Excess mortality has been one of the commonly used measures of the population health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden share several health and socioeconomic characteristics but adopted different control measures and experienced varying degrees of case and hospitalization burden during the pandemic. Using mortality trends between 2001 and 2019 and a combination of models, we estimated and compared annual and monthly excess mortality in these countries nationally as well as stratified by age, sex and subnational regions between 2020 and 2023.

Study design

Multi-model study.

Methods

Three methods were used to estimate mortality: i) a Bayesian spatial model with a random effect component for spatial dependence among subregions and trend and seasonality terms; ii) a Bayesian GAMM model with terms for annual trend (a thin-plate spline) and within-year seasonality (a cyclic cubic spline); and, iii) a combination of autoregressive and exponential trend smoothing methods. Estimates from these approaches were combined using model averaging.

Results

Based on age-standardized mortality rates (per 100,000 population) of the averaged estimates: Finland had the highest cumulative excess mortality of the four countries; older age groups (70+ year) accounted for nearly all excess mortality; men had higher excess rates than women; and capital regions had some of the lowest rates relative to other regions in each country. With a few exceptions, mortality in 2023 returned to pre-pandemic levels. Model verification indicated good calibration and superior skill of the combination model relative to its component models.

Conclusions

We believe our approach better quantifies uncertainty than individual models, and our estimates are comprehensive, spatially, temporally and demographically well-resolved, and can support further association studies.
2020-2023年估算北欧国家超额死亡率的多模型方法
目的超额死亡率一直是衡量COVID-19大流行对人群健康影响的常用指标之一。丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典在健康和社会经济方面具有若干共同特点,但在大流行期间采取了不同的控制措施,并经历了不同程度的病例和住院负担。利用2001年至2019年的死亡率趋势和多种模型的组合,我们估计并比较了这些国家在2020年至2023年期间的年度和月度超额死亡率,并按年龄、性别和次国家区域分层。研究设计多模型研究。方法采用三种方法估算死亡率:1)基于随机效应的贝叶斯空间模型,该模型考虑了分区间的空间依赖性以及趋势和季节性因素;ii)具有年趋势(薄板样条)和年内季节性(循环三次样条)项的贝叶斯GAMM模型;iii)自回归和指数趋势平滑方法的结合。这些方法的估计值使用模型平均相结合。结果基于年龄标准化死亡率(每10万人)的平均估计:芬兰的累积超额死亡率在四个国家中最高;年龄较大的年龄组(70岁以上)几乎占所有超额死亡率;男性的肥胖率高于女性;与各国其他地区相比,首都地区的肥胖率最低。除了少数例外,2023年的死亡率恢复到大流行前的水平。模型验证表明,组合模型相对于其组成模型具有较好的定标性和较好的技巧。我们相信我们的方法比单个模型更好地量化了不确定性,我们的估计是全面的,在空间、时间和人口统计学上都得到了很好的解决,可以支持进一步的关联研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信