Adriana Cancian , Fernando Viero , Sandra Mara Vieira Fontoura , Johnny R. Soares , Cimélio Bayer
{"title":"Ammonia volatilization from NBPT-treated urea in no-till maize at different soil textures in South Brazil","authors":"Adriana Cancian , Fernando Viero , Sandra Mara Vieira Fontoura , Johnny R. Soares , Cimélio Bayer","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2025.e00946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urea treated with urease inhibitors can significantly reduce NH<sub>3</sub> losses when urea is surface applied to the straw in a no-till (NT) system, but the site conditions may affect its efficiency. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficiency of the NBPT [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide] applied to common urea on the decrease of NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization in no-till maize in two sites with distinct soil textures, weather, and management in southern Brazil; and to evaluate the NBPT inhibition in delayed soil pH and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> elevation after urea hydrolysis. Two field experiments were conducted in the 2016/17 growing season at Guarapuava (GUA) (Rodhic Hapludox, clay) and Eldorado do Sul (ELD) (Typic Paleudult, sandy clay loam). The treatments were: (i) common urea (U) and (ii) U + urease inhibitor (U + NBPT), and (iii) control without N fertilization. The N sources were broadcast applied to maize at N rate of 100–180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>. In the laboratory, an experiment was conducted using U and U + NBPT, applied to the two soils, to evaluate urea hydrolysis. The NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization from U was faster and higher in the sandy soil compared to clayey soil, reaching 26 % of N applied in the first five days after application, compared to 10 % in GUA. In this period, the NBPT reduced the NH<sub>3</sub> loss from urea by 83 % in sandy soil (ELD) and 88 % in GUA (clay). After this period, rain events occurred, which favoured the diffusion of N from fertilizer in ELD, but not in GUA, where NH<sub>3</sub> losses increased from 10 to 14 % with U, and from 1 to 7 % with U + NBPT, reducing the efficiency of the inhibitor. Under controlled conditions, U application increased soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> levels up to 207 to 224 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>, and soil pH up to 6.8–8.1 in five days after application, while in U + NBPT the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> peak was reduced to 72 to 109 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> and pH to 6.2–7.2, showing similar efficiency in both soils. Nitrogen losses through NH₃ volatilization were intense during the first five days after urea application in no-till maize, especially in sandy soil. NBPT-treated urea is an effective N management practice in reducing ammonia losses in both sandy and clay soils; however, its efficiency decreases over time in the clay soil besides rainfall events. Further studies should investigate additional strategies to optimize NBPT efficiency in reducing NH<sub>3</sub> loss from urea in no-till systems in clay soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article e00946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009425000318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urea treated with urease inhibitors can significantly reduce NH3 losses when urea is surface applied to the straw in a no-till (NT) system, but the site conditions may affect its efficiency. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficiency of the NBPT [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide] applied to common urea on the decrease of NH3 volatilization in no-till maize in two sites with distinct soil textures, weather, and management in southern Brazil; and to evaluate the NBPT inhibition in delayed soil pH and NH4+ elevation after urea hydrolysis. Two field experiments were conducted in the 2016/17 growing season at Guarapuava (GUA) (Rodhic Hapludox, clay) and Eldorado do Sul (ELD) (Typic Paleudult, sandy clay loam). The treatments were: (i) common urea (U) and (ii) U + urease inhibitor (U + NBPT), and (iii) control without N fertilization. The N sources were broadcast applied to maize at N rate of 100–180 kg ha−1. In the laboratory, an experiment was conducted using U and U + NBPT, applied to the two soils, to evaluate urea hydrolysis. The NH3 volatilization from U was faster and higher in the sandy soil compared to clayey soil, reaching 26 % of N applied in the first five days after application, compared to 10 % in GUA. In this period, the NBPT reduced the NH3 loss from urea by 83 % in sandy soil (ELD) and 88 % in GUA (clay). After this period, rain events occurred, which favoured the diffusion of N from fertilizer in ELD, but not in GUA, where NH3 losses increased from 10 to 14 % with U, and from 1 to 7 % with U + NBPT, reducing the efficiency of the inhibitor. Under controlled conditions, U application increased soil NH4+ levels up to 207 to 224 mg kg−1, and soil pH up to 6.8–8.1 in five days after application, while in U + NBPT the NH4+ peak was reduced to 72 to 109 mg kg−1 and pH to 6.2–7.2, showing similar efficiency in both soils. Nitrogen losses through NH₃ volatilization were intense during the first five days after urea application in no-till maize, especially in sandy soil. NBPT-treated urea is an effective N management practice in reducing ammonia losses in both sandy and clay soils; however, its efficiency decreases over time in the clay soil besides rainfall events. Further studies should investigate additional strategies to optimize NBPT efficiency in reducing NH3 loss from urea in no-till systems in clay soils.
期刊介绍:
Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.