{"title":"Input taxes in agriculture: Experiences and perspectives for European agriculture","authors":"Robert Finger , Anders Branth Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Taxes on agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides are often discussed, but there are large knowledge gaps as existing evidence on the functioning, experiences and limitations is outdated and scattered. We fill this gap by synthesizing knowledge on agricultural input taxes and focusing on their potential for European policy. We show that there is great potential for input taxes to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of agri-environmental policies. If properly designed, (i) taxes can provide targeted incentives to achieve environmental objectives in a cost-effective way, (ii) a redistribution of tax revenues to farmers can limit income effects, (iii) when taxes replace command and control measures, this can contribute to administrative simplification. However, the experience with input taxes in Europe is mixed. Input taxes have often failed to achieve their intended effects, e.g. because of poor tax design and low tax levels, and there are other limitations that generate strong resistance in policy debates. We identify ways to overcome these limitations and present lessons from positive examples, such as the Danish experience. We argue that agricultural policy needs more than input taxes, but that they should be part of a comprehensive mix of instruments within an agricultural and food policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Taxes on agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides are often discussed, but there are large knowledge gaps as existing evidence on the functioning, experiences and limitations is outdated and scattered. We fill this gap by synthesizing knowledge on agricultural input taxes and focusing on their potential for European policy. We show that there is great potential for input taxes to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of agri-environmental policies. If properly designed, (i) taxes can provide targeted incentives to achieve environmental objectives in a cost-effective way, (ii) a redistribution of tax revenues to farmers can limit income effects, (iii) when taxes replace command and control measures, this can contribute to administrative simplification. However, the experience with input taxes in Europe is mixed. Input taxes have often failed to achieve their intended effects, e.g. because of poor tax design and low tax levels, and there are other limitations that generate strong resistance in policy debates. We identify ways to overcome these limitations and present lessons from positive examples, such as the Danish experience. We argue that agricultural policy needs more than input taxes, but that they should be part of a comprehensive mix of instruments within an agricultural and food policy.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.