Establishing viable European bison metapopulations in Central Europe

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Hendrik Bluhm , Rafał Kowalczyk , Wanda Olech , Kajetan Perzanowski , Damaris Zurell , Tobias Kümmerle
{"title":"Establishing viable European bison metapopulations in Central Europe","authors":"Hendrik Bluhm ,&nbsp;Rafał Kowalczyk ,&nbsp;Wanda Olech ,&nbsp;Kajetan Perzanowski ,&nbsp;Damaris Zurell ,&nbsp;Tobias Kümmerle","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restoring populations of large mammals in human-dominated landscapes requires careful planning of conservation strategies. To support such planning for the European bison (<em>Bison bonasus</em>), Europe's largest land mammal currently constrained to small and isolated populations, we parameterized an individual-based, spatially-explicit metapopulation model. We then systematically assessed the impacts of three conservation interventions: 1) connectivity restoration with wildlife overpasses, 2) additional reintroductions, and 3) reduced supplementary feeding to encourage dispersal. Our baseline model projected a doubling of bison abundance in Central Europe within 30 years to &gt;2250 females (in 20 occupied habitat patches), reaching &gt;4300 females (38 patches) within 100 years. Yet subpopulations often remained isolated, highlighting the need for interventions to increase connectivity to prevent a further erosion of already low genetic diversity. Of the interventions we tested, reintroductions were most effective (5 % abundance increase, 10 % patch occupancy increase, on average, after 50 years) and helped establish larger metapopulations that are important for maintaining genetic diversity. Individual wildlife overpasses had a small effect (1 % range increase). Reducing supplementary feeding did not promote range expansion and slightly slowed population growth. We found that the five extant subpopulations in north-eastern Poland could form a viable metapopulation and identified two additional promising regions for such metapopulations: (1) Western Poland/Eastern Germany, and (2) the Eastern Carpathians in Poland/Slovakia. Overall, our findings underscore the potential for European megafauna recovery, highlight the key role of reintroductions to help megafauna reclaim their historical ranges, and can guide more fine-scale assessments of the social-ecological feasibility of such recoveries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"305 ","pages":"Article 111074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoring populations of large mammals in human-dominated landscapes requires careful planning of conservation strategies. To support such planning for the European bison (Bison bonasus), Europe's largest land mammal currently constrained to small and isolated populations, we parameterized an individual-based, spatially-explicit metapopulation model. We then systematically assessed the impacts of three conservation interventions: 1) connectivity restoration with wildlife overpasses, 2) additional reintroductions, and 3) reduced supplementary feeding to encourage dispersal. Our baseline model projected a doubling of bison abundance in Central Europe within 30 years to >2250 females (in 20 occupied habitat patches), reaching >4300 females (38 patches) within 100 years. Yet subpopulations often remained isolated, highlighting the need for interventions to increase connectivity to prevent a further erosion of already low genetic diversity. Of the interventions we tested, reintroductions were most effective (5 % abundance increase, 10 % patch occupancy increase, on average, after 50 years) and helped establish larger metapopulations that are important for maintaining genetic diversity. Individual wildlife overpasses had a small effect (1 % range increase). Reducing supplementary feeding did not promote range expansion and slightly slowed population growth. We found that the five extant subpopulations in north-eastern Poland could form a viable metapopulation and identified two additional promising regions for such metapopulations: (1) Western Poland/Eastern Germany, and (2) the Eastern Carpathians in Poland/Slovakia. Overall, our findings underscore the potential for European megafauna recovery, highlight the key role of reintroductions to help megafauna reclaim their historical ranges, and can guide more fine-scale assessments of the social-ecological feasibility of such recoveries.
在中欧建立可行的欧洲野牛元种群
在人类主导的景观中恢复大型哺乳动物的种群需要仔细规划保护策略。欧洲野牛是欧洲最大的陆地哺乳动物,目前被限制在小而孤立的种群中,为了支持这种规划,我们参数化了一个基于个体的、空间明确的元种群模型。然后,我们系统地评估了三种保护干预措施的影响:1)与野生动物立交桥的连通性恢复,2)额外的重新引入,以及3)减少补充摄食以鼓励扩散。我们的基线模型预测,30年内中欧的野牛数量将增加一倍,达到2250只雌性野牛(在20个被占领的栖息地斑块中),100年内达到4300只雌性野牛(38个斑块)。然而,亚种群往往仍然是孤立的,这突出表明需要采取干预措施来增加连通性,以防止已经很低的遗传多样性进一步受到侵蚀。在我们测试的干预措施中,重新引入是最有效的(50年后,平均丰度增加5%,斑块占用增加10%),并有助于建立更大的元种群,这对维持遗传多样性很重要。个别野生动物立交桥的影响很小(范围增加1%)。减少补充喂养并没有促进范围扩大,反而略微减缓了种群的增长。我们发现波兰东北部现存的5个亚种群可以形成一个可行的元种群,并确定了另外两个有希望形成这种元种群的地区:(1)波兰西部/德国东部,(2)波兰/斯洛伐克的东喀尔巴阡山脉。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了欧洲巨型动物恢复的潜力,强调了重新引入的关键作用,以帮助巨型动物恢复其历史范围,并可以指导更精细的评估这种恢复的社会生态可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信