A synthesis of meta-analyses of immersive virtual reality interventions in pain

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tessa Rooney , Louise Sharpe , Natalie Winiarski , Jemma Todd , Ben Colagiuri , Dimitri Van Ryckeghem , Geert Crombez , Stefan C. Michalski
{"title":"A synthesis of meta-analyses of immersive virtual reality interventions in pain","authors":"Tessa Rooney ,&nbsp;Louise Sharpe ,&nbsp;Natalie Winiarski ,&nbsp;Jemma Todd ,&nbsp;Ben Colagiuri ,&nbsp;Dimitri Van Ryckeghem ,&nbsp;Geert Crombez ,&nbsp;Stefan C. Michalski","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The severity and impact of pain can vary greatly, even in individuals with the same physical injury. This variation underscores the need for a variety of treatment strategies in effective pain management. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology that has been used as a treatment in diverse pain populations and for diverse indications. In recent decades, many trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have examined the impact of VR for pain management. While there is some evidence for efficacy in terms of distraction, pre-exposure, and physical therapy; populations, comparators and interventions differ significantly between existing meta-analyses. Thus, the present umbrella review was conducted to determine the overall strength of evidence for all identified populations, comparators, and interventions by synthesising available meta-analyses. Fifty-four meta-analyses reporting on the effect of immersive VR interventions in pain management were identified. Overall, VR interventions appeared efficacious for procedural pain conditions, where used for distraction, and when compared to standard care. While there was some evidence for efficacy in chronic pain populations, this only indicated short-term improvement in pain intensity. We also identified numerous areas for future research wherein the available results were inconclusive, such as examining long term interventions and outcomes for chronic pain populations, reporting of adverse events, and examining the efficacy of VR interventions designed for physical therapy, augmented cognitive therapies, or pre-exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102566"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The severity and impact of pain can vary greatly, even in individuals with the same physical injury. This variation underscores the need for a variety of treatment strategies in effective pain management. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology that has been used as a treatment in diverse pain populations and for diverse indications. In recent decades, many trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have examined the impact of VR for pain management. While there is some evidence for efficacy in terms of distraction, pre-exposure, and physical therapy; populations, comparators and interventions differ significantly between existing meta-analyses. Thus, the present umbrella review was conducted to determine the overall strength of evidence for all identified populations, comparators, and interventions by synthesising available meta-analyses. Fifty-four meta-analyses reporting on the effect of immersive VR interventions in pain management were identified. Overall, VR interventions appeared efficacious for procedural pain conditions, where used for distraction, and when compared to standard care. While there was some evidence for efficacy in chronic pain populations, this only indicated short-term improvement in pain intensity. We also identified numerous areas for future research wherein the available results were inconclusive, such as examining long term interventions and outcomes for chronic pain populations, reporting of adverse events, and examining the efficacy of VR interventions designed for physical therapy, augmented cognitive therapies, or pre-exposure.
疼痛的严重程度和影响可能会有很大差异,即使是身体受到同样伤害的人。这种差异凸显了有效的疼痛管理需要多种治疗策略。虚拟现实(VR)是一种新兴技术,已被用于不同疼痛人群和不同适应症的治疗。近几十年来,许多试验、系统综述和荟萃分析研究了虚拟现实技术对疼痛治疗的影响。虽然在分散注意力、预暴露和物理治疗方面有一些疗效证据,但现有的荟萃分析在人群、比较对象和干预措施方面存在很大差异。因此,本综述通过综合现有的荟萃分析,确定了所有已确定人群、参照物和干预措施的总体证据强度。54项荟萃分析报告了身临其境的 VR 干预对疼痛管理的影响。总体而言,VR 干预似乎对程序性疼痛有疗效,可用于分散注意力,并可与标准护理进行比较。虽然有一些证据表明对慢性疼痛人群有效,但这只表明疼痛强度得到了短期改善。我们还发现了许多有待未来研究的领域,这些领域的现有研究结果尚无定论,例如研究慢性疼痛人群的长期干预措施和结果、不良事件报告,以及研究为物理治疗、增强认知疗法或预暴露而设计的 VR 干预措施的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信