Prevalence of Stable and Successfully Treated Periodontitis Subjects-A Service Evaluation of a Single Hospital Centre.

Varkha Rattu, Luigi Nibali
{"title":"Prevalence of Stable and Successfully Treated Periodontitis Subjects-A Service Evaluation of a Single Hospital Centre.","authors":"Varkha Rattu, Luigi Nibali","doi":"10.11607/prd.7565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the 1) prevalence of meeting the endpoints of 'stable periodontitis' (probing pocket depth (PPD) ≤4mm, bleeding on probing (BoP) <10%, no BoP at 4mm sites), 'endpoints of therapy' (no PPD >4mm with BoP, no PPD ≥6mm), 'controlled periodontitis' (≤4 sites with PPD ≥5mm), 'PPD <5mm' and 'PPD <6mm' at the start of supportive periodontal care (SPC) and 2) identify any variables which may affect endpoint achievement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This service evaluation evaluated consecutive patients entering SPC between 2020 and 2022 at Guy's Hospital, London. Data collected included periodontal parameters (PPD, FMPS, FMBS) at baseline and their final active periodontal treatment (APT) visit and were analysed using SPSS 29.0 for descriptive and quantitative statistics. Logistic regressions utilised univariable and multivariable models to examine associations between clinical variables and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 141 subjects (mean age 45.4 ± 1.1 years; 64.5% female; 58.9% Caucasian). Most subjects had generalised Stage III/IV periodontitis (93.6%). At SPC entry, 12.77% of subjects exhibited stable periodontitis, and 48.23% met the endpoints of therapy. Relative percentage changes from baseline to end of APT in achieving stable periodontitis/ endpoints of therapy in teeth were as follows: all teeth (66.25% / 90.97%), anteriors (81.75% / 97.12%), premolars (74.20% / 94.69%), and molars (52.40% / 86.01%). Regression analyses confirmed associations between age and disease extent with endpoints but explained limited variance (R² ≤ 0.267).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periodontal treatment significantly improved clinical parameters at site and tooth-level, though molars demonstrated lower endpoint achievement highlighting localised treatment challenges. Age and disease extent influenced outcomes, but predictor variables explained only modest variance, highlighting the complexity of achieving therapeutic success in periodontitis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To identify the 1) prevalence of meeting the endpoints of 'stable periodontitis' (probing pocket depth (PPD) ≤4mm, bleeding on probing (BoP) <10%, no BoP at 4mm sites), 'endpoints of therapy' (no PPD >4mm with BoP, no PPD ≥6mm), 'controlled periodontitis' (≤4 sites with PPD ≥5mm), 'PPD <5mm' and 'PPD <6mm' at the start of supportive periodontal care (SPC) and 2) identify any variables which may affect endpoint achievement.

Materials and methods: This service evaluation evaluated consecutive patients entering SPC between 2020 and 2022 at Guy's Hospital, London. Data collected included periodontal parameters (PPD, FMPS, FMBS) at baseline and their final active periodontal treatment (APT) visit and were analysed using SPSS 29.0 for descriptive and quantitative statistics. Logistic regressions utilised univariable and multivariable models to examine associations between clinical variables and outcomes.

Results: This analysis included 141 subjects (mean age 45.4 ± 1.1 years; 64.5% female; 58.9% Caucasian). Most subjects had generalised Stage III/IV periodontitis (93.6%). At SPC entry, 12.77% of subjects exhibited stable periodontitis, and 48.23% met the endpoints of therapy. Relative percentage changes from baseline to end of APT in achieving stable periodontitis/ endpoints of therapy in teeth were as follows: all teeth (66.25% / 90.97%), anteriors (81.75% / 97.12%), premolars (74.20% / 94.69%), and molars (52.40% / 86.01%). Regression analyses confirmed associations between age and disease extent with endpoints but explained limited variance (R² ≤ 0.267).

Conclusions: Periodontal treatment significantly improved clinical parameters at site and tooth-level, though molars demonstrated lower endpoint achievement highlighting localised treatment challenges. Age and disease extent influenced outcomes, but predictor variables explained only modest variance, highlighting the complexity of achieving therapeutic success in periodontitis management.

稳定和成功治疗牙周炎患者的患病率-单一医院中心的服务评估。
目的:确定1)满足“稳定性牙周炎”(探诊袋深度(PPD)≤4mm,探诊出血(BoP) 4mm, BoP,无PPD≥6mm),“控制性牙周炎”(≤4个部位,PPD≥5mm), PPD材料和方法的患病率。该服务评估评估了2020年至2022年期间在伦敦Guy's医院连续进入SPC的患者。收集的数据包括基线时的牙周参数(PPD、FMPS、FMBS)和最终的主动牙周治疗(APT)访诊,并使用SPSS 29.0进行描述性和定量统计。逻辑回归利用单变量和多变量模型来检验临床变量和结果之间的关联。结果:本分析纳入141例受试者(平均年龄45.4±1.1岁;64.5%的女性;58.9%的白人)。大多数受试者患有广泛性III/IV期牙周炎(93.6%)。在SPC进入时,12.77%的受试者表现出稳定的牙周炎,48.23%的受试者达到了治疗终点。从APT治疗开始到结束,达到稳定牙周炎/治疗终点的相对百分比变化如下:所有牙齿(66.25% / 90.97%)、前牙(81.75% / 97.12%)、前磨牙(74.20% / 94.69%)和磨牙(52.40% / 86.01%)。回归分析证实了年龄与疾病程度有终点的关联,但解释了有限的方差(R²≤0.267)。结论:牙周治疗显著改善了局部和牙齿水平的临床参数,尽管磨牙表现出较低的终点成就,突出了局部治疗的挑战。年龄和疾病程度影响结果,但预测变量只能解释适度的差异,突出了在牙周炎管理中实现治疗成功的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信