Therapeutic Guidelines for the Self-Management of Major Depressive Disorder: Scoping Review.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Priscila de Campos Tibúrcio, Priscila Maria Marcheti, Daniela Miori Pascon, Marco Antônio Montebello Junior, Maria Alzete de Lima, Carla Sílvia Fernandes, Célia Samarina Vilaça de Brito Santos, Maria do Perpétuo Socorro de Sousa Nóbrega
{"title":"Therapeutic Guidelines for the Self-Management of Major Depressive Disorder: Scoping Review.","authors":"Priscila de Campos Tibúrcio, Priscila Maria Marcheti, Daniela Miori Pascon, Marco Antônio Montebello Junior, Maria Alzete de Lima, Carla Sílvia Fernandes, Célia Samarina Vilaça de Brito Santos, Maria do Perpétuo Socorro de Sousa Nóbrega","doi":"10.2196/63959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder contributes to the global burden of mental illness. Therapeutic guidelines promote treatment self-management and support caregivers and family members in this process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify therapeutic guidelines for the symptoms of major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the assumptions established by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) protocol, carried out in 12 databases (LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, b-on, BDENF, AgeLine, Cochrane, BVS, IBECS, and CINAHL) and 5 secondary gray literature sources (Google Scholar, Global ETD Search, EBSCO Open Dissertations, CAPES Catalog of Theses and Dissertations, and the Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of the University of Sao Paulo). The eligibility criteria were based on the population, concept, and context framework: people diagnosed with major depressive disorder aged >18 years (population), therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder symptoms (concept), and symptoms of major depressive disorder (context). Data collection was carried out from March to July 2022 and updated in June 2024. The included studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, analytical observational, descriptive observational, qualitative, or quantitative studies; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and scoping and literature reviews published in full without time restrictions in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. All the information, as well as the studies captured, was stored in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using Rayyan and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were carefully read and classified, extracting the results. After review by 2 independent researchers, 62 studies were selected. The results are presented descriptively, including characterization of the studies and mapping and categorization of groups and subgroups of therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 62 studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included, where 44 (71%) came from indexed data sources and 18 (29%) were gray literature indexed on Google Scholar (13/62, 21%), doctoral theses (3/62, 5%), and master's dissertations (2/62, 3%). Among the therapeutic guidelines identified, mapped, and categorized, 7 major groups were identified for self-management: psychotherapy (32/62, 52%), adoption of healthy habits (25/62, 40%), integrative and complementary practices (17/62, 27%), relaxation techniques (9/62, 14%), consultation with a health professional (14/62, 22%), pharmacological therapy (9/62, 14%), and leisure or pleasurable activities (4/62, 6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was possible to identify therapeutic guidelines to promote self-management of major depressive disorder in the adult population. Therapeutic guidance is an important resource for patients, their families, and the community, making patients the protagonists of their own health. For health professionals, therapeutic guidelines become tools that help develop skills and competencies for care among patients, thus ensuring their ability to self-manage major depressive disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e63959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder contributes to the global burden of mental illness. Therapeutic guidelines promote treatment self-management and support caregivers and family members in this process.

Objective: We aimed to identify therapeutic guidelines for the symptoms of major depressive disorder.

Methods: This scoping review followed the assumptions established by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) protocol, carried out in 12 databases (LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, b-on, BDENF, AgeLine, Cochrane, BVS, IBECS, and CINAHL) and 5 secondary gray literature sources (Google Scholar, Global ETD Search, EBSCO Open Dissertations, CAPES Catalog of Theses and Dissertations, and the Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of the University of Sao Paulo). The eligibility criteria were based on the population, concept, and context framework: people diagnosed with major depressive disorder aged >18 years (population), therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder symptoms (concept), and symptoms of major depressive disorder (context). Data collection was carried out from March to July 2022 and updated in June 2024. The included studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, analytical observational, descriptive observational, qualitative, or quantitative studies; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and scoping and literature reviews published in full without time restrictions in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. All the information, as well as the studies captured, was stored in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using Rayyan and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were carefully read and classified, extracting the results. After review by 2 independent researchers, 62 studies were selected. The results are presented descriptively, including characterization of the studies and mapping and categorization of groups and subgroups of therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder.

Results: In total, 62 studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included, where 44 (71%) came from indexed data sources and 18 (29%) were gray literature indexed on Google Scholar (13/62, 21%), doctoral theses (3/62, 5%), and master's dissertations (2/62, 3%). Among the therapeutic guidelines identified, mapped, and categorized, 7 major groups were identified for self-management: psychotherapy (32/62, 52%), adoption of healthy habits (25/62, 40%), integrative and complementary practices (17/62, 27%), relaxation techniques (9/62, 14%), consultation with a health professional (14/62, 22%), pharmacological therapy (9/62, 14%), and leisure or pleasurable activities (4/62, 6%).

Conclusions: It was possible to identify therapeutic guidelines to promote self-management of major depressive disorder in the adult population. Therapeutic guidance is an important resource for patients, their families, and the community, making patients the protagonists of their own health. For health professionals, therapeutic guidelines become tools that help develop skills and competencies for care among patients, thus ensuring their ability to self-manage major depressive disorder.

重性抑郁障碍自我管理的治疗指南:范围综述。
背景:重度抑郁症是全球精神疾病负担的一部分。治疗指南促进治疗自我管理,并在此过程中支持照顾者和家庭成员。目的:我们旨在确定重度抑郁症症状的治疗指南。方法:本综述遵循Joanna Briggs研究所和PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和meta -分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)协议建立的假设,在12个数据库(LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, b-on, BDENF, AgeLine, Cochrane, BVS, IBECS和CINAHL)和5个二级灰色文献来源(谷歌Scholar, Global ETD Search, EBSCO Open disserts, CAPES Catalog of Theses and disserts)中进行。以及圣保罗大学学位论文数字图书馆)。入选标准基于人群、概念和情境框架:年龄在bb0 - 18岁之间被诊断为重度抑郁症的人(人群)、重度抑郁症症状自我管理治疗指南(概念)和重度抑郁症症状(情境)。数据收集于2022年3月至7月进行,并于2024年6月更新。纳入的研究包括实验性、准实验性、分析性观察、描述性观察、定性或定量研究;系统评价和荟萃分析;范围界定和文献综述,不受时间限制,以英语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语全文发表。所有信息以及捕获的研究都使用Rayyan和JBI证据合成手册存储在Microsoft Excel电子表格中。题目、摘要和全文被仔细阅读和分类,提取结果。经过2位独立研究人员的审查,我们选择了62项研究。结果是描述性的,包括表征的研究和绘图和分类组和亚组的治疗指南,自我管理的重度抑郁症。结果:共纳入2011 - 2023年间发表的62篇研究,其中44篇(71%)来自已索引数据源,18篇(29%)来自b谷歌Scholar检索的灰色文献(13/ 62,21 %)、博士论文(3/ 62,5 %)和硕士论文(2/ 62,3 %)。在确定、绘制和分类的治疗指南中,确定了7个主要的自我管理组:心理治疗(32/ 62,52%)、采用健康习惯(25/ 62,40%)、综合和补充实践(17/ 62,27%)、放松技术(9/ 62,14%)、咨询健康专业人员(14/ 62,22%)、药物治疗(9/ 62,14%)和休闲或愉快活动(4/ 62,6%)。结论:有可能确定治疗指南,以促进成人重度抑郁症的自我管理。治疗指导是患者、家属和社区的重要资源,使患者成为自身健康的主角。对于卫生专业人员来说,治疗指南成为帮助培养患者护理技能和能力的工具,从而确保他们有能力自我管理严重抑郁症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信