Building consensus regarding the definition of abnormal craniocervical motion in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation: a modified Delphi study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nikita G Alexiades, Daniela I Anderson, Amy D'Ambrosio, Rajiv Iyer, David F Bauer, Christopher M Bonfield, Sandip Chatterjee, Richard G Ellenbogen, Paul Grabb, Gerald Grant, Todd C Hankinson, Andrew Jea, David D Limbrick, Cormac Maher, Jonathan E Martin, Dominic N P Thompson, Douglas L Brockmeyer, Richard C E Anderson
{"title":"Building consensus regarding the definition of abnormal craniocervical motion in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation: a modified Delphi study.","authors":"Nikita G Alexiades, Daniela I Anderson, Amy D'Ambrosio, Rajiv Iyer, David F Bauer, Christopher M Bonfield, Sandip Chatterjee, Richard G Ellenbogen, Paul Grabb, Gerald Grant, Todd C Hankinson, Andrew Jea, David D Limbrick, Cormac Maher, Jonathan E Martin, Dominic N P Thompson, Douglas L Brockmeyer, Richard C E Anderson","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abnormal craniocervical motion (ACCM) in the setting of pediatric Chiari type 1 and 1.5 malformation (CM-1/1.5) is generally regarded to be uncommon. The focus of this modified Delphi study was to investigate and build consensus regarding the definition of ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1/1.5 and the clinical and radiographic methods to identify it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international group of 14 pediatric neurosurgeons with clinical and research expertise in the management of CM was asked to participate. The study focused only on ACCM in the setting of CM-1 and excluded other types of CM. An initial survey of current practices was administered, and based on these responses, a follow-up survey of potential consensus statements was distributed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of participants reaching agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A final hybrid virtual/in-person meeting was held for discussion and to generate final consensus statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the final Delphi round, 22 statements reached consensus following discussion and modification of previous statements. Statements that reached consensus included the identification of patient populations that may benefit from screening, recommended imaging for screening along with useful radiographic parameters, and a consideration of trial cervical immobilization in symptomatic patients with supportive imaging. An additional modification to all statements emphasizing the focus on ACCM was agreed upon. All participants stated that they would be willing or somewhat willing to change their practices based on consensus guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, an international group of pediatric neurosurgeons reached consensus on 22 expert opinion-based statements regarding ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1. Further study using a standardized approach to screening may facilitate a better understanding of the true incidence and impact of ACCM in CM-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Abnormal craniocervical motion (ACCM) in the setting of pediatric Chiari type 1 and 1.5 malformation (CM-1/1.5) is generally regarded to be uncommon. The focus of this modified Delphi study was to investigate and build consensus regarding the definition of ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1/1.5 and the clinical and radiographic methods to identify it.

Methods: An international group of 14 pediatric neurosurgeons with clinical and research expertise in the management of CM was asked to participate. The study focused only on ACCM in the setting of CM-1 and excluded other types of CM. An initial survey of current practices was administered, and based on these responses, a follow-up survey of potential consensus statements was distributed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of participants reaching agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A final hybrid virtual/in-person meeting was held for discussion and to generate final consensus statements.

Results: Following the final Delphi round, 22 statements reached consensus following discussion and modification of previous statements. Statements that reached consensus included the identification of patient populations that may benefit from screening, recommended imaging for screening along with useful radiographic parameters, and a consideration of trial cervical immobilization in symptomatic patients with supportive imaging. An additional modification to all statements emphasizing the focus on ACCM was agreed upon. All participants stated that they would be willing or somewhat willing to change their practices based on consensus guidelines.

Conclusions: In this study, an international group of pediatric neurosurgeons reached consensus on 22 expert opinion-based statements regarding ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1. Further study using a standardized approach to screening may facilitate a better understanding of the true incidence and impact of ACCM in CM-1.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信