Building consensus regarding the definition of abnormal craniocervical motion in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation: a modified Delphi study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-07 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24478
Nikita G Alexiades, Daniela I Anderson, Amy D'Ambrosio, Rajiv Iyer, David F Bauer, Christopher M Bonfield, Sandip Chatterjee, Richard G Ellenbogen, Paul Grabb, Gerald Grant, Todd C Hankinson, Andrew Jea, David D Limbrick, Cormac Maher, Jonathan E Martin, Dominic N P Thompson, Douglas L Brockmeyer, Richard C E Anderson
{"title":"Building consensus regarding the definition of abnormal craniocervical motion in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation: a modified Delphi study.","authors":"Nikita G Alexiades, Daniela I Anderson, Amy D'Ambrosio, Rajiv Iyer, David F Bauer, Christopher M Bonfield, Sandip Chatterjee, Richard G Ellenbogen, Paul Grabb, Gerald Grant, Todd C Hankinson, Andrew Jea, David D Limbrick, Cormac Maher, Jonathan E Martin, Dominic N P Thompson, Douglas L Brockmeyer, Richard C E Anderson","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abnormal craniocervical motion (ACCM) in the setting of pediatric Chiari type 1 and 1.5 malformation (CM-1/1.5) is generally regarded to be uncommon. The focus of this modified Delphi study was to investigate and build consensus regarding the definition of ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1/1.5 and the clinical and radiographic methods to identify it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international group of 14 pediatric neurosurgeons with clinical and research expertise in the management of CM was asked to participate. The study focused only on ACCM in the setting of CM-1 and excluded other types of CM. An initial survey of current practices was administered, and based on these responses, a follow-up survey of potential consensus statements was distributed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of participants reaching agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A final hybrid virtual/in-person meeting was held for discussion and to generate final consensus statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the final Delphi round, 22 statements reached consensus following discussion and modification of previous statements. Statements that reached consensus included the identification of patient populations that may benefit from screening, recommended imaging for screening along with useful radiographic parameters, and a consideration of trial cervical immobilization in symptomatic patients with supportive imaging. An additional modification to all statements emphasizing the focus on ACCM was agreed upon. All participants stated that they would be willing or somewhat willing to change their practices based on consensus guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, an international group of pediatric neurosurgeons reached consensus on 22 expert opinion-based statements regarding ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1. Further study using a standardized approach to screening may facilitate a better understanding of the true incidence and impact of ACCM in CM-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"486-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Abnormal craniocervical motion (ACCM) in the setting of pediatric Chiari type 1 and 1.5 malformation (CM-1/1.5) is generally regarded to be uncommon. The focus of this modified Delphi study was to investigate and build consensus regarding the definition of ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1/1.5 and the clinical and radiographic methods to identify it.

Methods: An international group of 14 pediatric neurosurgeons with clinical and research expertise in the management of CM was asked to participate. The study focused only on ACCM in the setting of CM-1 and excluded other types of CM. An initial survey of current practices was administered, and based on these responses, a follow-up survey of potential consensus statements was distributed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of participants reaching agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A final hybrid virtual/in-person meeting was held for discussion and to generate final consensus statements.

Results: Following the final Delphi round, 22 statements reached consensus following discussion and modification of previous statements. Statements that reached consensus included the identification of patient populations that may benefit from screening, recommended imaging for screening along with useful radiographic parameters, and a consideration of trial cervical immobilization in symptomatic patients with supportive imaging. An additional modification to all statements emphasizing the focus on ACCM was agreed upon. All participants stated that they would be willing or somewhat willing to change their practices based on consensus guidelines.

Conclusions: In this study, an international group of pediatric neurosurgeons reached consensus on 22 expert opinion-based statements regarding ACCM in pediatric patients with CM-1. Further study using a standardized approach to screening may facilitate a better understanding of the true incidence and impact of ACCM in CM-1.

建立共识的定义异常颅颈运动在儿童患者的Chiari畸形:一个修改德尔福研究。
目的:小儿Chiari 1型和1.5型畸形(CM-1/1.5)的颅颈运动异常(ACCM)通常被认为是罕见的。本改进的德尔菲研究的重点是探讨小儿CM-1/1.5患者ACCM的定义,以及鉴别其临床和放射学方法,并建立共识。方法:邀请14名在CM管理方面具有临床和研究经验的国际儿科神经外科医生参加。本研究仅关注CM-1情境下的ACCM,排除其他类型的CM。对目前的做法进行了初步调查,并根据这些答复分发了一份关于可能的协商一致声明的后续调查。共识被定义为≥80%的参与者在4点李克特量表(强烈同意、同意、不同意、强烈不同意)上达成一致。最后举行了一次虚拟/面对面混合会议,以进行讨论并产生最后的协商一致声明。结果:经过最后的德尔菲轮讨论和修改,22个陈述达成共识。达成共识的声明包括确定可能从筛查中受益的患者群体,推荐筛查成像以及有用的放射学参数,以及考虑在有支持性影像学的有症状患者中试用颈椎固定。会议商定了对所有声明的另一项修改,强调将重点放在ACCM上。所有与会者都表示,他们愿意或多少愿意根据协商一致的指导方针改变他们的做法。结论:在这项研究中,一个国际儿科神经外科医生小组就小儿CM-1患者的ACCM达成了22项基于专家意见的共识。采用标准化筛查方法的进一步研究可能有助于更好地了解CM-1中ACCM的真实发病率和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信