Psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in Peruvian healthcare work: A mixed Delphi consensus study.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Luis Fidel Abregú-Tueros, Peceros Pinto Benigno, Sheyla Karol Abregú-Arroyo
{"title":"Psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in Peruvian healthcare work: A mixed Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Luis Fidel Abregú-Tueros, Peceros Pinto Benigno, Sheyla Karol Abregú-Arroyo","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies on psychological violence in health care facilities have focused on the analysis of incidences in specific contexts. Nevertheless, consensus studies on the psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence related to interpersonal conflict and motivational demands are scarce. The aim of this study is to determine by Delphi consensus the psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in healthcare work for Peru and its geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed Delphi consensus method was applied, bringing together professionals with experience and knowledge of psychological violence. The study was conducted in three stages and three rounds of Delphi consultation between May 2023 and June 2024. The integration of consensus at regional and national levels was carried out through Graph Network Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to the third stage of the study, 444 experts in 32 focus groups from 81 health care institutions participated. 70.5% of the participants were women and 27.6% worked in nursing and emergency departments. After the Delphi consensus analysis, we obtained a ranked list of six psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence for Peru and nine for the regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the consensus, two of the main psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence in health establishments in the Costa and Forest regions are the devaluation of work and harassment by superiors towards subordinates that induce them to change jobs or resign. Excessive control by colleagues was the first hierarchy for the Sierra region. The differences between geographical regions in Peru and between studies in other countries reflect that the phenomenon of interprofessional violence is very specific and contextual; in the case of Peru the differences between regions may be due to health care facilities with different characteristics (e.g., rural vs. urban facilities).</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 2","pages":"2986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies on psychological violence in health care facilities have focused on the analysis of incidences in specific contexts. Nevertheless, consensus studies on the psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence related to interpersonal conflict and motivational demands are scarce. The aim of this study is to determine by Delphi consensus the psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in healthcare work for Peru and its geographical regions.

Methods: A mixed Delphi consensus method was applied, bringing together professionals with experience and knowledge of psychological violence. The study was conducted in three stages and three rounds of Delphi consultation between May 2023 and June 2024. The integration of consensus at regional and national levels was carried out through Graph Network Analysis.

Results: Up to the third stage of the study, 444 experts in 32 focus groups from 81 health care institutions participated. 70.5% of the participants were women and 27.6% worked in nursing and emergency departments. After the Delphi consensus analysis, we obtained a ranked list of six psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence for Peru and nine for the regions.

Conclusions: According to the consensus, two of the main psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence in health establishments in the Costa and Forest regions are the devaluation of work and harassment by superiors towards subordinates that induce them to change jobs or resign. Excessive control by colleagues was the first hierarchy for the Sierra region. The differences between geographical regions in Peru and between studies in other countries reflect that the phenomenon of interprofessional violence is very specific and contextual; in the case of Peru the differences between regions may be due to health care facilities with different characteristics (e.g., rural vs. urban facilities).

秘鲁医疗保健工作中职业间暴力的社会心理模式:一项混合德尔菲共识研究。
导言:关于卫生保健设施中的心理暴力的研究侧重于分析具体情况下的事件。然而,关于职业间暴力与人际冲突和动机需求相关的心理社会因素的共识性研究很少。本研究的目的是通过德尔菲共识确定秘鲁及其地理区域保健工作中专业间暴力的社会心理模式。方法:采用混合德尔菲共识法,汇集具有心理暴力经验和知识的专业人员。该研究在2023年5月至2024年6月期间进行了三个阶段和三轮德尔菲咨询。通过图网络分析对区域和国家层面的共识进行整合。结果:截至研究的第三阶段,来自81个卫生保健机构的32个焦点小组的444名专家参与了研究。70.5%的参与者是女性,27.6%在护理和急诊科工作。经过德尔菲共识分析,我们获得了秘鲁职业间暴力的六个心理社会因素和九个地区的排名。结论:根据共识,哥斯达黎加和森林地区保健机构的专业间暴力的两个主要社会心理因素是工作贬值和上级对下级的骚扰,导致他们换工作或辞职。同事的过度控制是塞拉地区的第一个等级制度。秘鲁地理区域之间和其他国家研究之间的差异反映出专业间暴力现象是非常具体和有背景的;就秘鲁而言,地区之间的差异可能是由于保健设施具有不同的特点(例如,农村与城市设施)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medwave
Medwave MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信