The correlation between sperm DNA methylation and DNA damage: a comparison of comet and TUNEL.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1523386
Hailey Zimmerman, Tim Jenkins
{"title":"The correlation between sperm DNA methylation and DNA damage: a comparison of comet and TUNEL.","authors":"Hailey Zimmerman, Tim Jenkins","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1523386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between sperm DNA methylation and DNA damage as determined by the comet or TUNEL assays.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective research study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-based andrology and <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Data came from 1,470 male partners (ages 18 and older) recruited from heterosexual couples (ages 18-45 years) seeking fertility treatments. These data were analyzed retrospectively from the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST) study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Comet and TUNEL measures and associations with DNA methylation patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comet and TUNEL values were correlated with one another across all samples (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.34, <i>P</i> < 0.001); however, when assessing the highest and lowest scores reported from each assay, there was little overlap between patients. This suggests that Comet and TUNEL are identifying key differences that may be meaningful and correlated with other sperm metrics. We compared both comet and TUNEL to methylation array data using a sliding window analysis, which identified far more significantly differentially methylated sites as a function of comet than TUNEL (3,387 vs. 23). Interestingly, sites associated with comet were associated with biological pathways related to DNA methylation involved in germline development, as determined by a GO term analysis. The TUNEL assay, by comparison, produced no relevant biological pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because the comet and TUNEL assays are both used to indicate levels of DNA damage, and outputs of both are correlated to each other, it would seem to follow that both are equally predictive of deviations in DNA methylation patterns. The findings of this study suggest that this is not the case. The comet assay shows a significantly higher association with DNA methylation disruption, and we therefore believe it to be a better indicator of sperm epigenetic health.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1523386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1523386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between sperm DNA methylation and DNA damage as determined by the comet or TUNEL assays.

Design: Retrospective research study.

Setting: University-based andrology and in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory.

Patients: Data came from 1,470 male partners (ages 18 and older) recruited from heterosexual couples (ages 18-45 years) seeking fertility treatments. These data were analyzed retrospectively from the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST) study.

Main outcome measures: Comet and TUNEL measures and associations with DNA methylation patterns.

Results: Comet and TUNEL values were correlated with one another across all samples (R 2 = 0.34, P < 0.001); however, when assessing the highest and lowest scores reported from each assay, there was little overlap between patients. This suggests that Comet and TUNEL are identifying key differences that may be meaningful and correlated with other sperm metrics. We compared both comet and TUNEL to methylation array data using a sliding window analysis, which identified far more significantly differentially methylated sites as a function of comet than TUNEL (3,387 vs. 23). Interestingly, sites associated with comet were associated with biological pathways related to DNA methylation involved in germline development, as determined by a GO term analysis. The TUNEL assay, by comparison, produced no relevant biological pathways.

Conclusions: Because the comet and TUNEL assays are both used to indicate levels of DNA damage, and outputs of both are correlated to each other, it would seem to follow that both are equally predictive of deviations in DNA methylation patterns. The findings of this study suggest that this is not the case. The comet assay shows a significantly higher association with DNA methylation disruption, and we therefore believe it to be a better indicator of sperm epigenetic health.

精子DNA甲基化和DNA损伤之间的关系:彗星和TUNEL的比较。
目的:探讨精子DNA甲基化与DNA损伤的关系。设计:回顾性研究。环境:大学男科和体外受精实验室。患者:数据来自1470名男性伴侣(18岁及以上),他们来自寻求生育治疗的异性伴侣(18-45岁)。这些数据来自叶酸和锌补充试验(FAZST)研究的回顾性分析。主要结果测量:Comet和TUNEL测量及其与DNA甲基化模式的关联。在所有样本中,Comet和TUNEL值都是相互相关的(r2 = 0.34, P)。结论:由于Comet和TUNEL检测都用于指示DNA损伤水平,并且两者的输出都是相互相关的,因此似乎可以得出两者都可以同样预测DNA甲基化模式的偏差。这项研究的结果表明,情况并非如此。彗星分析显示与DNA甲基化破坏的关联明显更高,因此我们认为它是精子表观遗传健康的更好指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信