Sustainability in food-based dietary guidelines: a review of recommendations around meat and dairy consumption and their visual representation.

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2470252
Maddie Sinclair, Emilie Combet, Tess Davis, Esther K Papies
{"title":"Sustainability in food-based dietary guidelines: a review of recommendations around meat and dairy consumption and their visual representation.","authors":"Maddie Sinclair, Emilie Combet, Tess Davis, Esther K Papies","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2470252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition away from high meat and dairy consumption and towards more plant-based diets is vital for environmental sustainability targets, including reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land use associated with food. Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) communicate nutrition information to a country's general public. However, it is unknown how different countries' FBDG communicate reducing meat and dairy intake in the context of sustainability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, we reviewed global consumer-facing FBDG (<i>n</i> = 58) in middle- and high-income countries to examine recommendations and information around meat and dairy consumption, and to explore the pictorial representation of these foods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Few countries used a sustainability argument to recommend reducing meat (6/58) or dairy consumption (2/58). The proportion of dairy images within food guides was consistently higher than meat images. Some countries' guidelines are starting to consider meat intake in the context of sustainability and implementing meat reduction recommendations. However, this is not the case for dairy, potentially due to complex nutritional implications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, our review shows that very few countries recommend reducing either meat or dairy consumption. To reduce the environmental impact of food systems, clearer guidelines backed by current evidence are needed, which provide justification behind recommendations, actionable advice for how to meet the recommendations, and appropriate quantified food targets or limits. This well-rounded advice is imperative to empower citizens to take action on their dietary habits, to reduce global meat and dairy consumption and replace these with more sustainable alternatives for human and planetary health.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2470252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2470252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transition away from high meat and dairy consumption and towards more plant-based diets is vital for environmental sustainability targets, including reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land use associated with food. Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) communicate nutrition information to a country's general public. However, it is unknown how different countries' FBDG communicate reducing meat and dairy intake in the context of sustainability.

Methods: To address this gap, we reviewed global consumer-facing FBDG (n = 58) in middle- and high-income countries to examine recommendations and information around meat and dairy consumption, and to explore the pictorial representation of these foods.

Results: Few countries used a sustainability argument to recommend reducing meat (6/58) or dairy consumption (2/58). The proportion of dairy images within food guides was consistently higher than meat images. Some countries' guidelines are starting to consider meat intake in the context of sustainability and implementing meat reduction recommendations. However, this is not the case for dairy, potentially due to complex nutritional implications.

Conclusion: Overall, our review shows that very few countries recommend reducing either meat or dairy consumption. To reduce the environmental impact of food systems, clearer guidelines backed by current evidence are needed, which provide justification behind recommendations, actionable advice for how to meet the recommendations, and appropriate quantified food targets or limits. This well-rounded advice is imperative to empower citizens to take action on their dietary habits, to reduce global meat and dairy consumption and replace these with more sustainable alternatives for human and planetary health.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信