Influence of maternal diabetes during pregnancy on ultrasound-measured fetal epicardial fat thickness: A meta-analysis.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Apizi Anwaier, Jian Li, Wei Liu, Liangjie Dong, Yunfei Ding, Zhaoxia Yu
{"title":"Influence of maternal diabetes during pregnancy on ultrasound-measured fetal epicardial fat thickness: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Apizi Anwaier, Jian Li, Wei Liu, Liangjie Dong, Yunfei Ding, Zhaoxia Yu","doi":"10.17305/bb.2025.11909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maternal diabetes during pregnancy, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregestational diabetes mellitus (PDM), has been linked to alterations in fetal development. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of maternal diabetes on fetal epicardial fat thickness (fEFT), measured via ultrasound-a potential marker of cardiometabolic risk. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to identify observational studies assessing fEFT in pregnant women with and without diabetes. A random-effects model was used to calculate the mean difference (MD) in fEFT between groups. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, and sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore sources of variability. Data from 10 studies, comprising 12 datasets and 1303 participants, were pooled. Women with diabetes during pregnancy had significantly higher fEFT compared to those without diabetes (MD: 0.37 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.49, P < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 69%). Sensitivity analyses, conducted by excluding one dataset at a time, confirmed the robustness of the findings (all P values < 0.05). Meta-regression revealed a positive correlation between gestational age (GA) at fEFT measurement and fEFT differences (coefficient = 0.040, P = 0.005), accounting for 83.2% of the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent results across study designs, maternal diabetes types, and demographic factors but highlighted greater fEFT differences in studies where GA at fEFT measurement was >26 weeks. In conclusion, maternal diabetes during pregnancy is associated with increased fEFT, particularly in later gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2025.11909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maternal diabetes during pregnancy, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregestational diabetes mellitus (PDM), has been linked to alterations in fetal development. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of maternal diabetes on fetal epicardial fat thickness (fEFT), measured via ultrasound-a potential marker of cardiometabolic risk. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to identify observational studies assessing fEFT in pregnant women with and without diabetes. A random-effects model was used to calculate the mean difference (MD) in fEFT between groups. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, and sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore sources of variability. Data from 10 studies, comprising 12 datasets and 1303 participants, were pooled. Women with diabetes during pregnancy had significantly higher fEFT compared to those without diabetes (MD: 0.37 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.49, P < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 69%). Sensitivity analyses, conducted by excluding one dataset at a time, confirmed the robustness of the findings (all P values < 0.05). Meta-regression revealed a positive correlation between gestational age (GA) at fEFT measurement and fEFT differences (coefficient = 0.040, P = 0.005), accounting for 83.2% of the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent results across study designs, maternal diabetes types, and demographic factors but highlighted greater fEFT differences in studies where GA at fEFT measurement was >26 weeks. In conclusion, maternal diabetes during pregnancy is associated with increased fEFT, particularly in later gestation.

妊娠期孕妇糖尿病对超声测量胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度的影响:一项荟萃分析。
妊娠期孕妇糖尿病,包括妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和妊娠期糖尿病(PDM),与胎儿发育的改变有关。本荟萃分析旨在研究母亲糖尿病对胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度(fEFT)的影响,通过超声波测量-心脏代谢风险的潜在标志。我们对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science进行了系统检索,以确定评估有或无糖尿病孕妇fEFT的观察性研究。采用随机效应模型计算各组间fEFT的平均差值(MD)。使用I²统计量评估异质性,并进行敏感性、亚组和元回归分析以探索变异性的来源。汇总了来自10项研究的数据,包括12个数据集和1303名参与者。妊娠期糖尿病妇女的fEFT明显高于无糖尿病妇女(MD: 0.37 mm, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.26 ~ 0.49, P < 0.001),具有中等异质性(I²= 69%)。通过一次排除一个数据集进行敏感性分析,证实了研究结果的稳健性(所有P值< 0.05)。meta回归显示胎龄(GA)与胎龄差异呈正相关(系数= 0.040,P = 0.005),占异质性的83.2%。亚组分析表明,在研究设计、产妇糖尿病类型和人口统计学因素中,结果是一致的,但在fEFT测量时GA为100 ~ 26周的研究中,fEFT差异更大。总之,妊娠期孕妇糖尿病与fEFT增加有关,尤其是妊娠后期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信