Performance characterization of spring-actuated prefilled pen devices for lebrikizumab and dupilumab.

Expert opinion on drug delivery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1080/17425247.2025.2477656
Rozhin Derakhshandeh, Javad Eshraghi, Milad Tavakolian, Kevin H Duffy, Jean-Christophe Veilleux, Galen H Shi, Pavlos P Vlachos
{"title":"Performance characterization of spring-actuated prefilled pen devices for lebrikizumab and dupilumab.","authors":"Rozhin Derakhshandeh, Javad Eshraghi, Milad Tavakolian, Kevin H Duffy, Jean-Christophe Veilleux, Galen H Shi, Pavlos P Vlachos","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2025.2477656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Design parameters of prefilled pens, known as autoinjectors within the medical device community, can affect pen's functioning and user experience. This study compares the performance of two 2 mL prefilled pen devices: lebrikizumab (125 mg/mL) and dupilumab (150 mg/mL).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We recorded force and acoustic signals during administration from the prefilled pen devices and performed high-speed video recording during needle insertion and drug delivery. Measurements were reported in these categories: (i) The kinematics of needle movement during insertion captured by two cameras (ii) Injection flow rate and duration, and the time between acoustic 1st (activation) click and 2nd click sounds (iii) Post-2nd click injection duration, and (iv) delivered dose volume. We investigated the impact of temperature on device performance by experimenting at room temperature (~25℃) and cool condition (~5℃).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lebrikizumab device demonstrated faster injection and more reliable end-of-dose indication, while the dupilumab device showed less lateral needle movement in air during insertion. The device activation forces are provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our investigation uncovered performance distinctions between lebrikizumab and dupilumab prefilled pens, which could potentially translate into patient experience, and varying levels of risk associated with intramuscular injection for the adult population and premature device removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"747-756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2025.2477656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Design parameters of prefilled pens, known as autoinjectors within the medical device community, can affect pen's functioning and user experience. This study compares the performance of two 2 mL prefilled pen devices: lebrikizumab (125 mg/mL) and dupilumab (150 mg/mL).

Research design and methods: We recorded force and acoustic signals during administration from the prefilled pen devices and performed high-speed video recording during needle insertion and drug delivery. Measurements were reported in these categories: (i) The kinematics of needle movement during insertion captured by two cameras (ii) Injection flow rate and duration, and the time between acoustic 1st (activation) click and 2nd click sounds (iii) Post-2nd click injection duration, and (iv) delivered dose volume. We investigated the impact of temperature on device performance by experimenting at room temperature (~25℃) and cool condition (~5℃).

Results: The lebrikizumab device demonstrated faster injection and more reliable end-of-dose indication, while the dupilumab device showed less lateral needle movement in air during insertion. The device activation forces are provided.

Conclusion: Our investigation uncovered performance distinctions between lebrikizumab and dupilumab prefilled pens, which could potentially translate into patient experience, and varying levels of risk associated with intramuscular injection for the adult population and premature device removal.

用于lebrikizumab和dupilumab的弹簧驱动预填充笔装置的性能表征。
背景:预填充笔(在医疗器械界称为自动注射器)的设计参数会影响笔的功能和用户体验。本研究比较了两种2ml预充笔装置的性能:lebrikizumab (125 mg/mL)和dupilumab (150 mg/mL)。研究设计和方法:通过预充笔装置记录给药过程中的力和声信号,并对针插和给药过程进行高速录像。测量结果分为以下几类:(i)由两台摄像机捕获的插入过程中针头运动的运动学;(ii)注射流速和持续时间,以及第一声(激活)咔嗒声和第二次咔嗒声之间的时间;(iii)第二次咔嗒声后注射持续时间;(iv)递送剂量体积。通过常温(~25℃)和低温(~5℃)实验,研究了温度对器件性能的影响。结果:lebrikizumab装置具有更快的注射速度和更可靠的剂量末指征,而dupilumab装置在插入过程中针头在空气中的侧向运动较少。提供了装置激活力。结论:我们的研究揭示了lebrikizumab和dupilumab预充笔之间的性能差异,这可能会转化为患者体验,以及成人人群肌肉注射和过早取出器械相关的不同风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信