Underutilized treatments for patients with refractory cancer pain: a qualitative study assessing the use of intrathecal drug delivery devices in the United Kingdom compared to alternative treatments in cancer pain management.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1481245
Victoria Barnosky, Matthew Brown, Somnath Bagchi, Remy Blain, Demir Husejnovic, Sandra Johnson, Meredith Mackworth-Praed
{"title":"Underutilized treatments for patients with refractory cancer pain: a qualitative study assessing the use of intrathecal drug delivery devices in the United Kingdom compared to alternative treatments in cancer pain management.","authors":"Victoria Barnosky, Matthew Brown, Somnath Bagchi, Remy Blain, Demir Husejnovic, Sandra Johnson, Meredith Mackworth-Praed","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1481245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research aims to better delineate how intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are incorporated into the oncology care continuum and highlight the need for further awareness of interventional options for pain management of cancer patients in the United Kingdom. The study focuses on exploring the knowledge, perspectives, and experiences of healthcare professionals regarding IDDS as a treatment option for managing chronic refractory pain in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A thematic coding using inductive analysis was employed to achieve the research objectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 healthcare professionals in various specialties, including oncology, neurosurgery, pain management, and palliative care. The interviews were transcribed, and a two-phased qualitative inductive coding approach was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of the study revealed four major themes: Education, Barriers & Benefits, Technical & Administrative, and Patient-Centered Care. The theme of Education highlighted the need for increased knowledge and awareness of IDDS among healthcare professionals. Barriers & Benefits encompassed concerns about infection risk, suitability for patients with a short life expectancy, and the challenges and advantages of IDDS use. The Technical & Administrative theme addressed cost considerations, device management, and the need for improved guidelines. Patient-Centered Care emphasized the importance of involving patients in decision-making and considering their physical and emotional well-being throughout the treatment pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research identifies several areas of unmet need in the management of refractory pain in cancer patients, including the development of more inclusive guidelines, greater awareness among clinicians and patients, and the role of medical technology companies in supporting effective pain management. The findings underscore the impact of IDDS on improving pain control and highlight the potential importance of early intervention and comprehensive pain management in influencing the trajectory of oncological diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1481245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1481245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This research aims to better delineate how intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are incorporated into the oncology care continuum and highlight the need for further awareness of interventional options for pain management of cancer patients in the United Kingdom. The study focuses on exploring the knowledge, perspectives, and experiences of healthcare professionals regarding IDDS as a treatment option for managing chronic refractory pain in cancer patients.

Methodology: A thematic coding using inductive analysis was employed to achieve the research objectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 healthcare professionals in various specialties, including oncology, neurosurgery, pain management, and palliative care. The interviews were transcribed, and a two-phased qualitative inductive coding approach was used to analyze the data.

Results: The findings of the study revealed four major themes: Education, Barriers & Benefits, Technical & Administrative, and Patient-Centered Care. The theme of Education highlighted the need for increased knowledge and awareness of IDDS among healthcare professionals. Barriers & Benefits encompassed concerns about infection risk, suitability for patients with a short life expectancy, and the challenges and advantages of IDDS use. The Technical & Administrative theme addressed cost considerations, device management, and the need for improved guidelines. Patient-Centered Care emphasized the importance of involving patients in decision-making and considering their physical and emotional well-being throughout the treatment pathway.

Conclusions: This research identifies several areas of unmet need in the management of refractory pain in cancer patients, including the development of more inclusive guidelines, greater awareness among clinicians and patients, and the role of medical technology companies in supporting effective pain management. The findings underscore the impact of IDDS on improving pain control and highlight the potential importance of early intervention and comprehensive pain management in influencing the trajectory of oncological diseases.

难治性癌性疼痛患者未充分利用的治疗方法:一项定性研究,评估英国鞘内给药装置的使用与癌性疼痛管理的替代治疗方法的比较。
目的:本研究旨在更好地描述鞘内给药系统(IDDS)如何纳入肿瘤护理连续体,并强调进一步认识英国癌症患者疼痛管理的介入性选择的必要性。本研究的重点是探讨医疗保健专业人员关于IDDS作为治疗癌症患者慢性难治性疼痛的治疗选择的知识、观点和经验。方法:采用归纳分析的主题编码法来达到研究目的。对18名不同专业的医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,包括肿瘤学、神经外科、疼痛管理和姑息治疗。对访谈进行转录,并采用两阶段定性归纳编码方法对数据进行分析。结果:研究结果揭示了四个主要主题:教育、障碍与利益、技术与管理、以病人为中心的护理。教育主题强调需要提高保健专业人员对缺碘性痢疾的知识和认识。障碍和益处包括对感染风险的关注,对预期寿命短的患者的适用性,以及使用IDDS的挑战和优势。技术和管理主题讨论了成本考虑、设备管理和改进指南的需要。以患者为中心的护理强调了让患者参与决策的重要性,并在整个治疗过程中考虑到他们的身体和情感健康。结论:本研究确定了癌症患者难治性疼痛管理中几个未满足需求的领域,包括制定更具包容性的指南,提高临床医生和患者的认识,以及医疗技术公司在支持有效疼痛管理方面的作用。研究结果强调了IDDS对改善疼痛控制的影响,并强调了早期干预和综合疼痛管理在影响肿瘤疾病发展轨迹方面的潜在重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信