Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Rates of Change: Comparison of 2 OCT Devices.

Q2 Medicine
Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Erica Su, Iris Zhuang, Sajad Besharati, Justin Park, Andrea Yonge, Lynn Shi, Joseph Caprioli, Robert E Weiss, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
{"title":"Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Rates of Change: Comparison of 2 OCT Devices.","authors":"Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Erica Su, Iris Zhuang, Sajad Besharati, Justin Park, Andrea Yonge, Lynn Shi, Joseph Caprioli, Robert E Weiss, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness rates of change and their variability between 2 commercial OCT devices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-four glaucoma eyes (94 patients) with central damage or moderate to advanced glaucoma with ≥ 2 years of follow-up and ≥ 4 pairs of OCT scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bivariate longitudinal Bayesian model was designed to compare inferences on RNFL rates of change from the 2 devices, both globally and in 12 clock hour sectors. Optic nerve OCT scans were acquired with Spectralis and Cirrus OCT devices in the same session. We inspected longitudinal RNFL profile plots from both OCT devices for all subjects across all sectors and globally.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The rates of change, longitudinal variances, and proportions of significant negative and positive slopes (slope < 0 or > 0 μm/year and 1-sided P < 0.025, respectively) were compared between the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (standard deviation) baseline 24-2 visual field mean deviation and median (range) follow-up time were -8.2 (5.5) dB and 4.5 (2.2-6.7) years, respectively. The mean (95% credible interval [CrI]) estimated global baseline RNFL thickness for Spectralis and Cirrus OCTs were 61.5 (58.6-64.1) and 65.3 (63.2-67.4) μm, respectively. The global RNFL rates of change for Spectralis and Cirrus OCTs were -0.70 μm/year (95% CrI = -0.88 to -0.51 μm/year) and -0.45 μm/year (95% confidence interval = -0.63 to -0.27 μm/year) and were significantly faster for Spectralis compared to Cirrus OCT (difference = -0.24 μm/year, 95% CrI -0.45 to -0.04 μm/year, P < 0.001) as were sectoral rates in 5 out of 12 sectors. Higher proportions of significant negative RNFL rates of change were found with Spectralis OCT globally and in clock hour sectors 2 to 6 and 8 to 10 (corresponding to nasal, inferonasal, inferotemporal, and temporal regions). The proportions of significant positive rates of change were small (0%-3%) across sectors and similar between the devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spectralis OCT rates of RNFL change were faster compared to those from Cirrus OCT. Spectralis OCT detected a higher proportion of significant negative rates globally and in some sectors. OCT devices are not comparable regarding detection of change in eyes with central damage or moderate to advanced glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness rates of change and their variability between 2 commercial OCT devices.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Participants: Ninety-four glaucoma eyes (94 patients) with central damage or moderate to advanced glaucoma with ≥ 2 years of follow-up and ≥ 4 pairs of OCT scans.

Methods: A bivariate longitudinal Bayesian model was designed to compare inferences on RNFL rates of change from the 2 devices, both globally and in 12 clock hour sectors. Optic nerve OCT scans were acquired with Spectralis and Cirrus OCT devices in the same session. We inspected longitudinal RNFL profile plots from both OCT devices for all subjects across all sectors and globally.

Main outcome measures: The rates of change, longitudinal variances, and proportions of significant negative and positive slopes (slope < 0 or > 0 μm/year and 1-sided P < 0.025, respectively) were compared between the devices.

Results: The mean (standard deviation) baseline 24-2 visual field mean deviation and median (range) follow-up time were -8.2 (5.5) dB and 4.5 (2.2-6.7) years, respectively. The mean (95% credible interval [CrI]) estimated global baseline RNFL thickness for Spectralis and Cirrus OCTs were 61.5 (58.6-64.1) and 65.3 (63.2-67.4) μm, respectively. The global RNFL rates of change for Spectralis and Cirrus OCTs were -0.70 μm/year (95% CrI = -0.88 to -0.51 μm/year) and -0.45 μm/year (95% confidence interval = -0.63 to -0.27 μm/year) and were significantly faster for Spectralis compared to Cirrus OCT (difference = -0.24 μm/year, 95% CrI -0.45 to -0.04 μm/year, P < 0.001) as were sectoral rates in 5 out of 12 sectors. Higher proportions of significant negative RNFL rates of change were found with Spectralis OCT globally and in clock hour sectors 2 to 6 and 8 to 10 (corresponding to nasal, inferonasal, inferotemporal, and temporal regions). The proportions of significant positive rates of change were small (0%-3%) across sectors and similar between the devices.

Conclusions: Spectralis OCT rates of RNFL change were faster compared to those from Cirrus OCT. Spectralis OCT detected a higher proportion of significant negative rates globally and in some sectors. OCT devices are not comparable regarding detection of change in eyes with central damage or moderate to advanced glaucoma.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

视网膜神经纤维层变化率:两种光学相干断层扫描设备的比较。
目的:比较两种商用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备对视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的变化率及其变异性。设计:前瞻性队列研究。参与者:94只伴有中枢性损伤或中晚期青光眼的青光眼(94例患者),随访≥2年,OCT扫描≥4对。方法:设计了一个双变量纵向贝叶斯模型来比较全球和12小时扇区两种设备对RNFL变化率的推断。视神经OCT扫描在同一疗程中使用Spectralis和Cirrus OCT设备进行。我们检查了来自所有部门和全球所有受试者的OCT设备的纵向RNFL剖面图。主要结局指标:变化率、纵向方差、显著负斜率和显著正斜率(斜率0 μm/年)的比例和单侧结果:平均(SD)基线24-2 VF平均偏差和中位(范围)随访时间分别为-8.2 (5.5)dB和4.5(2.2-6.7)年。Spectralis和Cirrus oct的平均(95%可信区间[CrI])估计全球基线RNFL厚度分别为61.6(58.9-64.1)和65.3 (63.2-67.4)μm。Spectralis OCT和卷云OCT的全球RNFL变化率分别为-0.70 μm/年(95% CrI = -0.88 ~ -0.51 μm/年)和-0.45 μm/年(95% CI = -0.63 ~ -0.27 μm/年),并且Spectralis OCT的RNFL变化率明显快于卷云OCT(差异=-3.85 μm, 95% CrI -5.28 ~ -2.42, p结论:Spectralis OCT的RNFL变化率比卷云OCT更快。Spectralis OCT在全球和某些领域检测到的显著负变化率比例更高。OCT设备在检测中枢性损伤或中晚期青光眼的变化方面没有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信