Unit of attentional refreshing in multiple identity tracking: object and Boolean map

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Huadong Yu, Juntian Lin, Shujie Wu, Yu Zhang, Jianrong Jia, Jie Li
{"title":"Unit of attentional refreshing in multiple identity tracking: object and Boolean map","authors":"Huadong Yu,&nbsp;Juntian Lin,&nbsp;Shujie Wu,&nbsp;Yu Zhang,&nbsp;Jianrong Jia,&nbsp;Jie Li","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03039-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tracking multiple distinct moving objects requires periodically refreshing the objects’ identity-location bindings. Classic theories assume that individual objects are the units involved in refreshing. Considering that features and locations can be represented as Boolean maps, here we investigated whether Boolean maps can also serve as the units of refreshing in multiple identity tracking (MIT). We used an adapted MIT paradigm, in which every two targets shared the same identity and thus could be represented in one Boolean map. We examined whether only the cued target was refreshed (i.e., object-based refreshing) or the other target sharing the same identity was also refreshed (i.e., Boolean map-based refreshing). In Experiment 1, where objects moved randomly, results showed that while the cued target was tracked better than uncued targets, no significant advantage was observed for the same-identity target, indicating no Boolean map-based refreshing. In Experiment 2, same-identity targets moved in parallel, maintaining a stable spatial relationship within each Boolean map. Both same-identity and cued targets were tracked better than other targets, demonstrating a same-Boolean-map advantage. In Experiment 3, where different-identities targets moved in parallel, no significant advantage was found for either the target moved parallel to or sharing the same identity as the cued target. Taken together, the results indicate that a Boolean map can serve as the unit for attentional refreshing in MIT, but only when targets with the same identity are moving in parallel, so that the spatial relationship within each Boolean map remains the same while the objects are moving; otherwise the refreshing is based on individual objects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"87 3","pages":"862 - 873"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-025-03039-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracking multiple distinct moving objects requires periodically refreshing the objects’ identity-location bindings. Classic theories assume that individual objects are the units involved in refreshing. Considering that features and locations can be represented as Boolean maps, here we investigated whether Boolean maps can also serve as the units of refreshing in multiple identity tracking (MIT). We used an adapted MIT paradigm, in which every two targets shared the same identity and thus could be represented in one Boolean map. We examined whether only the cued target was refreshed (i.e., object-based refreshing) or the other target sharing the same identity was also refreshed (i.e., Boolean map-based refreshing). In Experiment 1, where objects moved randomly, results showed that while the cued target was tracked better than uncued targets, no significant advantage was observed for the same-identity target, indicating no Boolean map-based refreshing. In Experiment 2, same-identity targets moved in parallel, maintaining a stable spatial relationship within each Boolean map. Both same-identity and cued targets were tracked better than other targets, demonstrating a same-Boolean-map advantage. In Experiment 3, where different-identities targets moved in parallel, no significant advantage was found for either the target moved parallel to or sharing the same identity as the cued target. Taken together, the results indicate that a Boolean map can serve as the unit for attentional refreshing in MIT, but only when targets with the same identity are moving in parallel, so that the spatial relationship within each Boolean map remains the same while the objects are moving; otherwise the refreshing is based on individual objects.

多身份跟踪中的注意力刷新单元:对象和布尔映射。
跟踪多个不同的移动对象需要定期刷新对象的身份-位置绑定。经典理论认为单个对象是参与刷新的单位。考虑到特征和位置可以用布尔映射表示,本文研究了布尔映射是否也可以作为多重身份跟踪(MIT)中的刷新单元。我们使用了一个适应的MIT范例,其中每两个目标共享相同的身份,因此可以在一个布尔映射中表示。我们检查是否只有提示目标被刷新(即,基于对象的刷新),还是共享相同身份的其他目标也被刷新(即,基于布尔映射的刷新)。在实验1中,对象是随机移动的,结果显示,虽然有线索的目标比没有线索的目标更容易被跟踪,但相同身份的目标没有明显的优势,这表明没有基于布尔映射的刷新。在实验2中,相同身份的目标并行移动,在每个布尔映射中保持稳定的空间关系。相同身份和提示的目标都比其他目标更容易被跟踪,显示出相同布尔映射的优势。在实验3中,当不同身份的目标平行移动时,无论目标与线索目标平行移动还是与线索目标具有相同身份,都没有发现显著的优势。综上所述,在MIT中,布尔映射可以作为注意力刷新的单元,但只有当具有相同身份的目标并行移动时,才能使每个布尔映射内的空间关系在物体移动时保持不变;否则刷新是基于单个对象的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信