Transorbital Approach With and Without Lateral Rim Osteotomy: Anatomical Reappraisal and Clinical Experience to the Orbit and Middle Cranial Fossa.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001532
Fabio Torregrossa, Cesare Zoia, Daniele Bongetta, Megan M J Bauman, Amedeo Piazza, Miguel Saez-Alegre, Alessandro De Bonis, Luciano Leonel, Stephen Graepel, Giovanni Grasso, Maria Peris-Celda
{"title":"Transorbital Approach With and Without Lateral Rim Osteotomy: Anatomical Reappraisal and Clinical Experience to the Orbit and Middle Cranial Fossa.","authors":"Fabio Torregrossa, Cesare Zoia, Daniele Bongetta, Megan M J Bauman, Amedeo Piazza, Miguel Saez-Alegre, Alessandro De Bonis, Luciano Leonel, Stephen Graepel, Giovanni Grasso, Maria Peris-Celda","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The lateral transorbital approach (LTOA) has gained increased recognition, but there is still a paucity of data on its effectiveness and advantages compared with the LTOA with lateral orbitotomy, herein denoted as the lateral orbital wall approach (LOWA). The aim of this study was to provide an anatomical reappraisal and the authors' clinical experience to compare the 2 approaches to the orbit and middle cranial fossa (MCF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight latex-injected cadaveric specimens were used to perform LTOA and LOWA. The operative depth of each approach to key anatomical landmarks was measured. Fifty high-resolution computed tomography studies were reviewed to calculate the operative angles. We reviewed 40 consecutive cases treated with LTOA and LOWA at our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the LTOA, the LOWA provided shorter operative depths to the optic foramen ( P < .05), foramen ovale ( P < .05), and to the junction eyeball-cranial nerve II ( P = .13). It also offered better access to the anterior aspect of the orbit with less orbital content retraction. The LTOA and LOWA provided different operative angles to key anatomical landmarks in the orbit and MCF ( P < .05). In our chart review, 31 patients underwent the LTOA, whereas 9 underwent the LOWA to treat orbital and MCF lesions. Patients undergoing LOWA experienced postoperative complications related to periorbital nerves, such as frontalis palsy (n = 1) and supraorbital neuralgia (n = 1). Patients undergoing LTOA were more prone to complications associated with intraorbital manipulation (n = 4), including diplopia and ptosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that the LTOA can be an effective surgical strategy for addressing orbital apex and MCF lesions. Although the LOWA provides access to the aforementioned areas, it may be more suitable for anterior orbital lesions that require direct access with wider entry exposure and extensive orbital content manipulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"543-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The lateral transorbital approach (LTOA) has gained increased recognition, but there is still a paucity of data on its effectiveness and advantages compared with the LTOA with lateral orbitotomy, herein denoted as the lateral orbital wall approach (LOWA). The aim of this study was to provide an anatomical reappraisal and the authors' clinical experience to compare the 2 approaches to the orbit and middle cranial fossa (MCF).

Methods: Eight latex-injected cadaveric specimens were used to perform LTOA and LOWA. The operative depth of each approach to key anatomical landmarks was measured. Fifty high-resolution computed tomography studies were reviewed to calculate the operative angles. We reviewed 40 consecutive cases treated with LTOA and LOWA at our institution.

Results: Compared with the LTOA, the LOWA provided shorter operative depths to the optic foramen ( P < .05), foramen ovale ( P < .05), and to the junction eyeball-cranial nerve II ( P = .13). It also offered better access to the anterior aspect of the orbit with less orbital content retraction. The LTOA and LOWA provided different operative angles to key anatomical landmarks in the orbit and MCF ( P < .05). In our chart review, 31 patients underwent the LTOA, whereas 9 underwent the LOWA to treat orbital and MCF lesions. Patients undergoing LOWA experienced postoperative complications related to periorbital nerves, such as frontalis palsy (n = 1) and supraorbital neuralgia (n = 1). Patients undergoing LTOA were more prone to complications associated with intraorbital manipulation (n = 4), including diplopia and ptosis.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that the LTOA can be an effective surgical strategy for addressing orbital apex and MCF lesions. Although the LOWA provides access to the aforementioned areas, it may be more suitable for anterior orbital lesions that require direct access with wider entry exposure and extensive orbital content manipulation.

经眶入路伴与不伴外侧缘截骨:眶与中颅窝的解剖学再评价及临床经验。
背景与目的:外侧经眶入路(LTOA)已得到越来越多的认可,但与外侧眶切开LTOA相比,其有效性和优势仍缺乏数据,本文称外侧眶壁入路(LOWA)。本研究的目的是提供解剖学上的重新评估和作者的临床经验来比较眼眶和中颅窝(MCF)的两种入路。方法:采用8例注射乳胶的尸体标本,分别进行LTOA和LOWA。测量每条关键解剖标志入路的手术深度。我们回顾了50个高分辨率计算机断层扫描研究,以计算手术角度。我们回顾了我院连续40例采用LTOA和LOWA治疗的病例。结果:与LTOA相比,LOWA提供了更短的手术深度到视神经孔(P < 0.05)、卵圆孔(P < 0.05)和眼球-颅神经连接处II (P = 0.13)。它还提供了更好的进入眶前面的机会,减少了眶内容物的缩回。LTOA和LOWA为眼眶和MCF的关键解剖标志提供了不同的手术角度(P < 0.05)。在我们的图表回顾中,31例患者接受了LTOA,而9例接受了LOWA来治疗眼眶和MCF病变。LOWA患者术后出现与眶周神经相关的并发症,如额肌麻痹(n = 1)和眶上神经痛(n = 1)。LTOA患者更容易出现眶内操作相关的并发症(n = 4),包括复视和上睑下垂。结论:我们的数据表明,下睑下垂是治疗眶尖和MCF病变的有效手术策略。虽然LOWA提供了进入上述区域的通道,但它可能更适合需要直接进入更宽的入路暴露和广泛的眶内内容物操作的眶前病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信