Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fenofibrate in Participants with Mild Hepatic Impairment or with Advanced Fibrosis due to Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease
Islam R. Younis PhD, FCP, Elijah J. Weber PhD, Cara Nelson PhD, Ann R. Qin PhD, Timothy R. Watkins MD, MSc, Ahmed A. Othman PhD, FCP
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fenofibrate in Participants with Mild Hepatic Impairment or with Advanced Fibrosis due to Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease","authors":"Islam R. Younis PhD, FCP, Elijah J. Weber PhD, Cara Nelson PhD, Ann R. Qin PhD, Timothy R. Watkins MD, MSc, Ahmed A. Othman PhD, FCP","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fenofibrate is contraindicated in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis due to limited clinical data. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of fenofibrate in participants with mild hepatic impairment (phase 1 study) or advanced fibrosis due to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD; phase 2a study). In the phase 1 study, participants with mild hepatic impairment and healthy matched controls (each n = 10) received a single, oral dose of fenofibrate 48 mg. In the phase 2a study, participants with hypertriglyceridemia and advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD were randomly assigned (1:1) fenofibrate 48 mg (n = 15) or fenofibrate 145 mg (n = 16) combined with firsocostat 20 mg, taken orally once daily for 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed in both studies. In the phase 1 study, the AUC<sub>inf</sub> of fenofibric acid was 25% higher in participants with mild hepatic impairment than in healthy matched participants. In the phase 2a study, the AUC<sub>ss,0-24</sub> of fenofibric acid (fenofibrate 48 mg dose) in participants with F3 fibrosis and F4 cirrhosis was approximately 60% and 80%, respectively, higher than the AUC<sub>inf</sub> in healthy participants in the phase 1 study, and was 20% higher in participants with F4 cirrhosis than in participants with F3 fibrosis. In both studies, most adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were grade 1-2. In the phase 2a study, three participants had grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia. Fenofibrate was well tolerated, and modest differences were observed in fenofibric acid exposure in participants with mild hepatic impairment or advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 7","pages":"850-859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fenofibrate is contraindicated in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis due to limited clinical data. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of fenofibrate in participants with mild hepatic impairment (phase 1 study) or advanced fibrosis due to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD; phase 2a study). In the phase 1 study, participants with mild hepatic impairment and healthy matched controls (each n = 10) received a single, oral dose of fenofibrate 48 mg. In the phase 2a study, participants with hypertriglyceridemia and advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD were randomly assigned (1:1) fenofibrate 48 mg (n = 15) or fenofibrate 145 mg (n = 16) combined with firsocostat 20 mg, taken orally once daily for 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed in both studies. In the phase 1 study, the AUCinf of fenofibric acid was 25% higher in participants with mild hepatic impairment than in healthy matched participants. In the phase 2a study, the AUCss,0-24 of fenofibric acid (fenofibrate 48 mg dose) in participants with F3 fibrosis and F4 cirrhosis was approximately 60% and 80%, respectively, higher than the AUCinf in healthy participants in the phase 1 study, and was 20% higher in participants with F4 cirrhosis than in participants with F3 fibrosis. In both studies, most adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were grade 1-2. In the phase 2a study, three participants had grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia. Fenofibrate was well tolerated, and modest differences were observed in fenofibric acid exposure in participants with mild hepatic impairment or advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD.