Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft: the current situation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Soichiro Ebisawa, Etsuo Tsuchikane, Koichi Kishi, Yoshiaki Ito, Hisayuki Okada, Satoru Sumitsuji, Yuji Oikawa, Ryohei Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Tanaka
{"title":"Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft: the current situation.","authors":"Soichiro Ebisawa, Etsuo Tsuchikane, Koichi Kishi, Yoshiaki Ito, Hisayuki Okada, Satoru Sumitsuji, Yuji Oikawa, Ryohei Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Tanaka","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The equipment and strategies used for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) have been improved. However, CTO-PCI for patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) remains challenging. This study aimed to compare the strategies and initial success rates of CTO-PCI in patients with and without prior CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors extracted data from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry for this study. They enrolled 11 605 patients who underwent CTO-PCI by Japanese operators from 2014 to 2022. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: post-CABG (n = 830) and no-CABG patients (n = 10775).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-CABG patients were older than the no-CABG patients (70.3 ± 9.2 vs 67.5 ± 11.1 years, P less than .01). The post-CABG group exhibited more prevalent long, tortuous, and calcified lesions, as well as higher Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry scores than the no-CABG group (1.8 ± 1.1 vs 1.4 ± 1.1, P less than .01). The post-CABG patients opted for the primary and rescue retrograde approaches more frequently than the no-CABG patients (52.4% vs 40.7%, P less than .02), and the post-CABG patients exhibited a lower success rate than the no-CABG patients (82.2% vs 90.2%, P less than .01). However, an improvement in success rates was observed in the post-CABG patients compared with that of Japanese data from 1999 to 2011 (71%-82.2%). Additionally, the procedure time decreased from 210 to 191 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with no-CABG patients, the initial success rate of CTO-PCI for post-CABG patients remains low, and the retrograde approach is more commonly chosen. However, the success rate has improved over previous data.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The equipment and strategies used for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) have been improved. However, CTO-PCI for patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) remains challenging. This study aimed to compare the strategies and initial success rates of CTO-PCI in patients with and without prior CABG.

Methods: The authors extracted data from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry for this study. They enrolled 11 605 patients who underwent CTO-PCI by Japanese operators from 2014 to 2022. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: post-CABG (n = 830) and no-CABG patients (n = 10775).

Results: The post-CABG patients were older than the no-CABG patients (70.3 ± 9.2 vs 67.5 ± 11.1 years, P less than .01). The post-CABG group exhibited more prevalent long, tortuous, and calcified lesions, as well as higher Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry scores than the no-CABG group (1.8 ± 1.1 vs 1.4 ± 1.1, P less than .01). The post-CABG patients opted for the primary and rescue retrograde approaches more frequently than the no-CABG patients (52.4% vs 40.7%, P less than .02), and the post-CABG patients exhibited a lower success rate than the no-CABG patients (82.2% vs 90.2%, P less than .01). However, an improvement in success rates was observed in the post-CABG patients compared with that of Japanese data from 1999 to 2011 (71%-82.2%). Additionally, the procedure time decreased from 210 to 191 minutes.

Conclusions: Compared with no-CABG patients, the initial success rate of CTO-PCI for post-CABG patients remains low, and the retrograde approach is more commonly chosen. However, the success rate has improved over previous data.

既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者慢性全闭塞的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗现状
目的:改进慢性全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的设备和策略。然而,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的CTO-PCI仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在比较有和无CABG患者的CTO-PCI策略和初始成功率。方法:作者从本研究的日本CTO-PCI专家登记处提取数据。他们在2014年至2022年期间招募了11 605名由日本运营商接受CTO-PCI治疗的患者。该队列分为2组:cabg术后(n = 830)和未cabg患者(n = 10775)。结果:cabg术后患者比未cabg患者年龄大(70.3±9.2 vs 67.5±11.1岁,P < 0.01)。cabg后组表现出更普遍的长、弯曲和钙化病变,日本多中心CTO Registry评分高于未cabg组(1.8±1.1 vs 1.4±1.1,P < 0.01)。cabg后患者选择原发性和抢救性逆行入路的频率高于无cabg患者(52.4% vs 40.7%, P < 0.02), cabg后患者的成功率低于无cabg患者(82.2% vs 90.2%, P < 0.01)。然而,与日本1999年至2011年的数据相比,cabg后患者的成功率有所提高(71%-82.2%)。此外,手术时间从210分钟减少到191分钟。结论:与无cabg患者相比,cabg后患者CTO-PCI的初始成功率仍然较低,逆行入路更为常见。然而,成功率比以前的数据有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信